Comulada v. United States, 380 U.S. 978 (1965). · Go Syfert
Search
Comulada v. United States, 380 U.S. 978 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “appellate court will generally comply [with district court’s request for remand] by remanding the case”
76 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Dan Draper, Jr. And Joe Fitzgibbon (ca10, 1984-10-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Dan Draper, Jr. And Joe Fitzgibbon
10th Cir. · 1984 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
appellate court will generally comply by remanding the case
cited Cited "see" Bell v. National Railroad Passenger
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See D’Elia v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 338 F.2d 701 , 702 (2d Cir.1964) (per curiam), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 978 , 85 S.Ct. 1340 , 14 L.Ed.2d 272 (1965).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Morrison (2×)
Or. Ct. App. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Comulada, 2 Cir., 1965, 340 F.2d 449, 451 , cert. denied, 380 U.S. 978 , 85 S.Ct. 1343 , 14 L.Ed.2d 272 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Frank Quiroz Carrasco, United States of America v. Lucindo Ruiz-Ontiveros
9th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Comulada, 2 Cir., 1965, 340 F.2d 449, 451 , cert. denied, 380 U.S. 978 , 85 S.Ct. 1343 , 14 L.Ed.2d 272 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Thomas Super and Perry Burns
2d Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Comulada, 340 F.2d 449, 452 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 978 , 85 S.Ct. 1343 , 14 L.Ed.2d 272 (1965).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ronald Carabbia
6th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lewis, 338 F.2d 137 , cert. den. 380 U.S. 978 , 85 S.Ct. 1342 , 14 L.Ed.2d 272 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Noriega
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Comulada, 340 F.2d 449 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied 380 U.S. 978 , 85 S.Ct. 1343 , 14 L.Ed.2d 272 (1965); Richardson v. United States, 360 F.2d 366 (5th Cir. 1966) ; United States v. Smith, 331 F.2d 145 (9th Cir. 1964).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Garland Corp.
Bankr. D. Mass. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e. g., Official Creditors Committee of Fox Markets v. Ely, 337 F.2d 461 (9th Cir. 1964) cert. denied 380 U.S. 978 , 85 S.Ct. 1342 , 14 L.Ed.2d 272 (1965), where the court stated that in cases where fees are sought by officers of the Court, “the time element is of major importance, although there are other factors which may be given consideration”, Id. at 465.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Continental Bronze Co. v. Salvo & Armstrong Steel Co.
Mass. App. Ct. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Scaduto v. Orlando, 340 F.2d 293, 300 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 380 U.S. 978 (1965) (applying Massachusetts, law).
Comulada
v.
United States
No. 996.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 26, 1965.
380 U.S. 978
Albert J. Krieger for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.