green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Michigan v. Jackson
(2×)
But in McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U. S. 356 (1965), we summarily reversed a decision that the police could elicit information after indictment even though counsel had not yet been appointed." Id., at 484, n. 8 . [10] The State also argues that the Michigan Supreme Court's finding of a valid Fifth Amendment waiver should require the finding of a valid Sixth Amendment waiver.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Flack
Without comment, the Supreme Court reversed in McLeod (381 US, at page 356) by memorandum opinion simply citing Massiah .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Charles White v. Parker L. Hancock, Warden
He now seeks review by the federal courts, claiming infringement of his constitutional rights, citing Massiah v. United States, 1964, 377 U.S. 201 , 84 S.Ct. 1199 , 12 L.Ed.2d 246 , and McLeod v. Ohio, 1965, 381 U.S. 356 , 85 S.Ct. 1556 , 14 L.Ed.2d 682 , which reversed, without opinion, State v. McLeod, 1962, 173 Ohio St. 520 , 184 N.E.2d 101 , remanded, 1964, 378 U.S. 582 , 84 S.Ct. 1922 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1037 , on remand 1 Ohio St.2d 60 , 203 N.E.2d 349 .
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. Brewer
See, McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356 , 85 S.Ct. 1556 , 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965); Mathies v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 98 , 374 F.2d 312 (1967) (opinion by Burger, J.); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Woodson v. United States
The court concluded that whether the incriminating statements were elicited in a surreptitious manner is “constitutionally irrelevant.” Brewer v. Williams, supra, 430 U.S. at 400 , 97 S.Ct. at 1240 ; see also McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356 , 85 S.Ct. 1556 , 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965) (per curiam); United States v. Crisp, 435 F.2d 354, 358 (7th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 947 , *913 91 S.Ct. 1640 , 29 L.Ed.2d 116 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sweat Et Al. v. Arkansas
(2×)
See, e.g., McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356 , 85 S.Ct. 1556 , 14 L.Ed.2d 682 (1965) ( per curiam ), rev'g 1 Ohio St.2d 60 , 203 N.E.2d 349 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Colon
It has long been recognized that police interrogation of a person who has been indicted is such a critical stage of the proceedings against him that a failure to guarantee the aid of counsel during such interrogation "might deny a defendant 'effective representation * * * at the only stage when legal aid and advice would help him’ ” (Massiah v United States, supra, p 204, citing Mr. Justice Douglas’ concurring opn in Spano v New York, 360 US 315, 326 ; see, also, McLeod v Ohio, 381 US 356 , revg State v McLeod, 1 Ohio St 2d 60).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. California
(2×)
See also McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U. S. 356 (1965). [8] Cf. Hoffa v. United States, 385 U. S. 293, 309-310 (1966). [9] See n. 12, infra. [10] Cf. People v. Robinson, 16 App. Div. 2d 184, 224 N. Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Aiken
(2×)
See also McLeod v. Ohio, 381 U.S. 356 , 14 L.Ed.2d 682 , 85 Sup. Ct. 1556 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph T. McLeod
v.
Ohio
v.
Ohio
1117, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1965.
Petitioner pro se., James V. Barbuto and John D. Smith for respondent.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 96 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Massiah v. United States, 377 U. S. 201.