green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Christopher Leecan v. Raymond Lopes, Commissioner of Correction
See, United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 764 (2d Cir. 1965) (approving on direct appeal instruction that reasonable doubt is “a doubt for which a reason can be given”), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966); United States v. Davis, 328 F.2d 864, 867-68 (2d Cir.1964) (ruling, on direct appeal, such an instruction “not erroneous” although “not approved” and “perhaps unwise”); Barber v. Scully, 557 F.Supp. 1292, 1296 (S.D.N.Y. 1983) (rejecting habeas challenge to such an instruction on authority of United States v. Davis), aff'd, 731 F.2d 1073 (2d Ci…
cited
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See United States v. Mardian, 546 F.2d 973 (D.C.Cir.1976), citing United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 756-59 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 947 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
See United States v. Mardian, 546 F.2d 973 (D.C.Cir.1976), citing United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 756-59 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 947 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Allen v. City of Marietta
See United States v. Collins, 349 F.2d 863 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 960 , 86 *492 S.Ct. 1228, 16 L.Ed.2d 303 , reh’g denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1469 , 16 L.Ed.2d 545 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Parente
See United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 756-59 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Agosto
See United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas E. Flaherty, United States of America v. James R. Kearns, Jr., United States of America v. Stuart H. Wahl
See United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 757-58 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966). * Our review of the evidence convinces us that it was sufficient to sustain the convictions of all defendants.
cited
Cited "see"
Sousa v. United States
See United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 758-59 (2d Cir. 1965), cert, denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Anton Richardson, Ralph S. Bowman, Frank Salaman, Robert William Bradford
See United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 769 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966); United States v. Murray, supra, 492 F.2d at 195 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Odell Marshall
As stated by Wigmore, “[i]t cannot be doubted that the use of a recorded past recollection . . . now occupies a firm and unassailable place in our practice and doctrine.” 3 Wigmore, Section 736 at 70 (3rd ed.) The justification for this practice “is safeguarded by the requirements that (1) the witness acknowledge the document as accurate, and (2) that it be prepared ‘contemporaneously’ with the events.” Goings v. United States, 377 F.2d 753 , 760 n. 8 (8th Cir. 1967); see Papalia v. United States, 243 F.2d 437, 441 (5th Cir. 1957); McCormick, Evidence, § 9, p. 15 (1954); 3 Wigmore…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Wiener
See United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 757 (2 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas E. Keane
See United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 772-73 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966); Grummons v. Zollinger, 240 F.Supp. 63 (N.D.Ind. 1964), aff’d, 341 F.2d 464 (7th Cir. 1965).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Wray Crockett, Jr., David Keen Crockett, and Jewell L. Futch
See United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 757 (2nd Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Monsanto Company v. Rohm & Haas Company
(2×)
See too McCullough Tool Company v. Well Surveys, Inc, 343 F.2d 381 , 394 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. den. 383 U.S. 933 , 86 S.Ct. 1061 , 15 L.Ed.2d 851 (1966), rehearing den. 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1452 , 16 L.Ed.2d 545 (1966); Armour & Co. v. Wilson & Co, Inc, 274 F.2d 143, 148 (7th Cir. 1960); Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation v. Tatnall Measuring Systems Company, 169 F.Supp. 1, 25 (E.D.Pa. 1958), aff’d on other grounds, 268 F. 2d 395 (3rd Cir. 1959), cert. den. 361 U.S. 984 , 80 S.Ct. 190 , 4 L.Ed.2d 151 .
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Forrest PARROTT and Donald Parrott, Appellants
See United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S. Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McIntyre
Although United States v. Lustman, supra, stated “that a showing of prejudice is not required when a criminal defendant is asserting a constitutional right under the Sixth Amendment”, id., 258 F.2d at 478 , the later Second Circuit opinion in United States v. Simmons, supra, appears to limit Lust-man by stating that said case would be applicable where the delay was “so substantial as to be prima facie prejudicial.” 338 F.2d at 808 ; see United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 765 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966) (no showing of prejudice);…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. Conway
While we do not approve such a definition, it has in this circuit been held not to be erroneous.”) (citations omitted)); see also United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 764 (2d Cir.1965) (approving charge that reasonable doubt is *490 “a doubt for which a reason can be given”), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966); Marshall v. United States, 197 F. 511, 512-513 (2d Cir.) (“There was no error in charging the jury that ‘by the term reasonable doubt is meant not a capricious doubt, but a substantial doubt-a doubt that you can give a reason for if the court c…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Booth
Cir. 1976); see, e.g., United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 759 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S. Ct. 1467 , 16 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jones
Compare, United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 756 (2d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. MC NEIL
See also, e.g., United States v. Kelly, 349 F. 2d 720, 769 (2 Cir.1962), cert. den. 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed. 2d 544 (1966), where the Second Circuit held that instructing as to both defendants was not constitutional error where, as here, one defendant opted for and one against the instructions. [2] Cf. United States v. Garguilo, 310 F. 2d 249 (2 Cir.1962) (no constitutional error to give the instruction in the absence of a specific request).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harry Bernstein
(2×)
See also United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 755-56 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966); United States v. Benjamin, 328 F.2d 854, 864 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 953 , 84 S.Ct. 1631 , 12 L.Ed.2d 497 (1964) (two aspects of single scheme — selling unregistered securities and defrauding in sale of securities).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fred Carl Fisher
See, e. g., United States v. Collins, 349 F.2d 863, 866 (2nd Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 960 , 86 S.Ct. 1228 , 16 L.Ed.2d 303 , rehearing denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1469 , 16 L.Ed.2d 545 (1966); Formhals v. United States, 278 F.2d 43, 46 (9th Cir. 1960); Jarrett v. United States, 92 F.2d 698, 699 (9th Cir. 1937).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Johnson
See e. g., United States v. Kelly, 349 F. 2d 720, 778 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U. S. 947 , 86 S. Ct. 1467 , 16 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kroncke
See e.g., United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 778 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966); United States v. Agueci, 310 F.2d 817, 833-834 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied [Guippone v. United States], 372 U.S. 959 , 83 S.Ct. 1013 , 10 L.Ed.2d 11 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Caci
See, e.g., United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 778 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966); United States v. Agueci, 310 F.2d 817, 833-834 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 959 , 83 S.Ct. 1013 , 10 L.Ed.2d 11 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Caci
See, e.g., United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720, 778 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966); United States v. Agueci, 310 F.2d 817, 833-834 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 959 , 83 S. Ct. 1013 , 10 L.Ed.2d 11 (1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kelly
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 730.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1966.
Edward Bennett Williams and Harold Ungar for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.