green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Heidi S. Weissmann, M.D., Cross-Appellee v. Leonard M. Freeman, M.D., Cross-Appellant
(2×)
See Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303, 306 (2d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Business Trends Analysts, Inc. v. Freedonia Group, Inc.
See Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303, 309 (2d Cir.1966) cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1964); Oxford Book Co. v. College Entrance Book Co., 98 F.2d 688 (2d Cir.1938).
discussed
Cited "see"
New Era Publications International, APS v. Henry Holt & Co.
See Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303 (2d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967); Meeropol v. Nizer, 361 F.Supp. 1063 (S.D.N.Y. 1973), remanded for further findings, 560 F.2d 1061 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1013 , 98 S.Ct. 727 , 54 L.Ed.2d 756 (1978); Estate of Hemingway v. Random House, Inc., 49 Misc.2d 726 , 268 N.Y.S.2d 531 (Sup. Ct.N.Y.Co. 1966), aff'd, 25 A.D.2d 719 , 269 *1526 N.Y.S.2d 366 (1st Dept.1966), aff'd on other grounds, 23 N.Y.2d 341 , 296 N.Y.S.2d 771 , 244 N.E.2d 250 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Jerome D. Salinger A/K/A J.D. Salinger v. Random House, Inc. And Ian Hamilton
See Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303, 306 (2d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 2232-34 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises
(2×)
Accord, Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F. 2d 303, 309 (CA2 1966), cert. denied, 385 U. S. 1009 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Business Lists, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
See Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303 (2nd Cir.1966), ce rt. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967), and Hoehling v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 618 F.2d 972 (2nd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 841 , 101 S.Ct. 121 , 66 L.Ed.2d 49 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander v. Haley
See Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303, 309 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967); Gardner v. Nizer, supra, 391 F.Supp. at 942 ; Fuld v. National Broadcasting Co., supra, 390 F.Supp. at 882 ; Greenbie v. Noble, 151 F.Supp. 45, 65-66 (S.D.N.Y.1957); Lake v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 140 F.Supp. 707, 708-09 (S.D.Cal.1956).
cited
Cited "see"
Triangle Publications, Inc. v. Sports Eye, Inc.
See Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303, 310 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Todaro
See Robinson v. United States, 366 F.2d 575, 578 (10 Cir. 1966), cert. den. 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 717 , 17 L.Ed.2d 547 (1967) ; United States v. Laurelli, 293 F.2d 830, 832 (3 Cir. 1961), cert. den. 368 U.S. 961 , 82 S.Ct. 406 , 7 L.Ed.2d 392 (1962) ; United States v. Klass, 166 F.2d 373, 377 (3 Cir. 1948) ; United States v. Bradley, 152 F.2d 425, 426 (3 Cir. 1945). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Higgins v. Baker
Co., supra; Nimmer on Copyright, supra § 138 at 600; see Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303, 307, 310 (2d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
United Merchants and Manufacturers, Inc. v. Sutton
See Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303, 311 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967); American Visuals Corp. v. Holland, 219 F.2d 233 (2d Cir. 1955) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Palmer v. Braun
See, e.g., Rosemont Enters., Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303 (2d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct.0 714, 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967) (appellate court, reversing district court's grant of preliminary injunction, expressed "considerable doubt” that defendant’s act of copying 31 lines verbatim and paraphrasing eight additional lines from plaintiff's work was material and substantial enough to constitute copyright infringement); Martin Luther King, Jr. Ctr. for Social Change, Inc. v. American Heritage Prods., Inc., 508 F.Supp. 854 (N.D.Ga.1981), rev'd on other grounds, 694 F…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sega Enterprises Ltd., a Japanese Corporation v. Accolade, Inc., a California Corporation
It is the means by which copyright advances the progress of science and art.” Id. - U.S. at -, 111 S.Ct. at 1290 ; see also id. - U.S. at -, 111 S.Ct. at 1292 (“In truth, ‘[i]t is just such wasted effort that the proscription against the copyright of ideas and facts ... [is] designed to prevent.’ ”) (quoting Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303, 310 (2d Cir.1966), cert. denied 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967)); CAI, 23 U.S.P.Q.2d at 1257.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walt Disney Productions v. The Air Pirates
Compare Rosem-ont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 256 F.Supp. 55 (S.D.N.Y.1966), reversed on other grounds, 366 F.2d 303 (2d Cir. 1966), certiorari denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 ; see 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 143.2.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States
See, e.g., Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F. 2d 303 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 (1967); Simms v. Stanton, 75 F. 6,13-14 (C.C.N.D.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Meeropol v. Nizer
See, e. g., Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House Inc., 366 F.2d 303 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David M. Robinson v. United States
See, e. g., United States v. Kemper, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 47, 50-51 , 433 F.2d 1153, 1156-1157 (1970), and cases cited in notes 26-28 thereof 72 The descriptive details recorded included "a pock-marked complexion," "gold-capped front teeth," and items of Army-type clothing differing somewhat from transaction to transaction 73 Since we conclude that application of the identity exception would be in order, we need not inquire into the applicability of other exceptions such as common scheme or plan, see Robinson v. United States, 366 F.2d 575, 578 (10th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rosemont Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Random House, Inc.
v.
Random House, Inc.
No. 771.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1967.
Chester C. Davis and Lola S. Lea for petitioner., Horace S. Manges for respondents.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.