green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dinome, Salvatore Mangialino, Anthony Senter, Joseph Testa, Ronald Ustica, Carlo Profeta, A/K/A Carlos A/K/A Carmello, Douglas Rega, Judith May Hellman, Wayne Hellman, and Sol Hellman
See United States v. Branker, 395 F.2d 881, 887-89 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 573 (1969) (finding prejudice against some defendants in lengthy trial involving numerous counts unrelated to those defendants).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. DiNome
See United States v. Branker, 395 F.2d 881, 887-89 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 573 (1969) (finding prejudice against some defendants in lengthy trial involving numerous counts unrelated to those defendants).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Castellano
See United States v. Branker, 395 F.2d 881, 887-88 (2d Cir.1968) (“as the number of counts is increased, the record becomes more complex and it is more difficult for a juror to keep the various charges against the several defendants and the testimony as to each of them separate in his mind”), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 573 (1969) .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John O. Tilton
See Menendez v. United States, 393 F.2d 312 (5 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 572 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
4 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1197, 5 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 570 United States of America v. Jose Esteban Cambindo Valencia, Jose Manuel Escobar Orjuella, Federico Gonzalez, Alfonso Velasco, Mario Caicedo, Edgar Enrique Moreno Ortiz, Julio Francisco Bermudez Prado, Rafael Flores Valencia, Carmen Vivas, Freddie Williams, Jesus Losada, and Rosalinda Losada
See United States v. Branker, 395 F.2d 881, 887-88 (2d Cir. 1968), Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 573 (1969). 213 With respect to the Government's second point, involving our footnote 25, we grant the petition for rehearing to the extent of clarifying that footnote.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Valencia
See United States v. Branker, 395 F.2d 881, 887-88 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 573 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cianciulli
See U. S. v. Branker, 395 F.2d 881, 887-888 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 573 (1969); U. S. v. Vida, supra, 370 F.2d at 765 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Judon
Palermo v. United States, 360 U.S. 343, 350 , 79 S.Ct. 1217, 1223 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1959); see Menendez v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 393 F.2d 312 , cert. den., 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 572 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Keller
See, Menéndez v. United States, 393 F.2d 312 (C.A. 5, 1968), cert. den. 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 572 ; United States v. Littlepage, 435 F.2d 498 (C.A. 5,1970), cert. den. 402 U.S. 915 , 91 S.Ct. 1374 , 28 L.Ed.2d 657 , reh. den. 402 U.S. 1013 , 91 S.Ct. 2187 , 29 L.Ed.2d 436 ; Hon.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Elliott Rixner, Benjamin Jones, Jr., and Anthony Lowery, A/K/A \Sugar Bear\""
See Menendez v. United States, 393 F.2d 312 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 572 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Benny Ong
See United States v. Branker, 395 F.2d 881, 887-89 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 573 (1969); cf. United States v. Kompinski, 373 F.2d 429 (2d Cir. 1967).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Noble C. Beasley and James H. Finley
See Menendez v. United States, 393 F.2d 312 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 572 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Albert Jenkins
See United States v. Branker, 395 F.2d 881 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 573 (1968); United States v. Kelly, 349 F. 2d 720 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1467 , 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Apollo
See Menendez v. United States, 393 F.2d 312 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S. Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 572 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Booth
Ed. 2d 814 (1986) (Brennan, J., with whom Blackmun, J., joined, concurring in part and dissenting in part); see also United States v. Branker, 395 F.2d 881, 888 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S. Ct. 639 , 21 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rastelli
See also Clemente, supra at 1324, where, citing Sweig and United States v. Issacs, 493 F.2d 1124, 1158-61 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 417 U.S. 976 , 94 S.Ct. 3184 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1146 (1974), Judge Sand concluded that a false declaration charge was properly joined to the substantive and RICO counts “because these substantive counts clearly related to and were the subject of the questions involved in the false declaration charges.” Severance Under Rule 14 Although some of the various defendants making Rule 14 motions have arguments specific to their personal situation, the common contention is t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Elden Turcotte and Forrest Gerry, Jr.
Compare United States v. Branker, 395 F.2d 881 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 573 (1969); United States v. Bozza, 365 F.2d 206 (2d Cir. 1966). 12 Ill Turcotte and Gerry next argue that the trial court so abused its discretion in restricting their cross-examination of Kraft that their convictions should be reversed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eugene L. Smaldone
See also Menendez v. United States, 393 F.2d 312, 316 (5th Cir. 1968), cert, denied, 393 U.S. 1029 , 89 S.Ct. 639 , 21 L.Ed.2d 572 (1969). 4 Finally, in view of the vast extent of the cross-examination and the extensive prior statements of Merkowitz which were furnished to the defense, we fail to perceive prejudice.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Menendez
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 349.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1969.
John Paul Howard for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.