green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1971 ·
…even a slight showing of possible prejudice, inflamed by the fact of long and unjustified delay, might have entitled defendant to relief from continued jeopardy.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
James O. Hinton, Jr. v. United States
But see Harling v. United States, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 327 , 401 F.2d 392 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1068 , 89 S.Ct. 725 , 21 L.Ed.2d 711 (1969). 21 .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Ronald Holt
(2×)
even a slight showing of possible prejudice, inflamed by the fact of long and unjustified delay, might have entitled defendant to relief from continued jeopardy.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George R. Keskey, Jr.
(2×)
Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 210.08[1], at 10-48 (2d ed. 1987); see Buick v. United States, 396 F.2d 912 , 913-14 n. 1 (9th Cir.1968), ce rt. denied, 393 U.S. 1068 , 89 S.Ct. 724 , 21 L.Ed.2d 711 (1969). 5 Keskey does not claim that the district court’s reconstruction of the record was intentionally false.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Louis Lines
See, Buick v. United States, 396 F.2d 912, 914 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1068 , 89 S.Ct. 724 , 21 L.Ed.2d 711 (1969); Bayless v. United States, 365 F.2d 694, 696 (10th Cir. 1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Riley v. United States
See Harling v. United States, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 327 , 401 F.2d 392 , reh. denied, (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1068 , 89 S.Ct. 725 , 21 L.Ed.2d 711 (1969), for a discussion of the necessity of a showing of prejudice. 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles D. Coleman v. United States
See Harling v. United States, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 327 , 330-331, 401 F.2d 392, 395-396 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1068 , 89 S.Ct. 725 , 21 L.Ed.2d 711 (1969) (While a “slight showing of possible prejudice * * * might have entitled defendant to relief * * here there was not “even a wisp of prejudice.”); Taylor v. United States, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 183, 186 , 238 F.2d 259, 262 (1956) (The case against appellant was “weak.” Had it been “overwhelming,” a different result might have been reached.).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Argo
v.
Alabama
v.
Alabama
No. 715.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 1969.
393 U.S. 1068
MacDonald Oallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and John C. Tyson III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2)
Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.