green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Ordinarily the failure to give an instruction on alibi defense will not be considered absent a proper request.”
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. John E. Coughlin and Peter A. Pepe
ordinarily the failure to give an instruction on alibi defense will not be considered absent a proper request.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Ruell Poole
See United States v. Caci, 401 F.2d 664, 672 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 917 , 89 S.Ct. 1180 , 22 L.Ed.2d 450 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Silides v. Thomas
See Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith v. FCC, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 146 , 403 F.2d 169 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 930 , 89 S.Ct. 1190 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969); Sun Oil Co. v. FPC, 256 F.2d 233 (5th Cir. 1958).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph Santana
See United States v. Caci, 401 F.2d 664, 672 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 917 , 89 S.Ct. 1180 , 22 L.Ed.2d 450 *716 (1969) .
cited
Cited "see"
The Citizens Committee to Keep Progressive Rock v. Federal Communications Commission, Midwestern Broadcasting Company, Intervenor
See Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith v. FCC, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 146 , 403 F.2d 169, 171 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 930 , 89 S.Ct. 1190 , 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fernando Medina Cantu
“Consistency in the verdict is not necessary.” Dunn v. United States, 1932, 284 U.S. 390, 393 , 52 S.Ct. 189,190 , 76 L.Ed. 356 ; see Tyler v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 397 F.2d 565, 570 , cert. denied, 1969, 394 U.S. 917 , 89 S.Ct. 1187 , 22 L.Ed.2d 450 ; United States v. Carbone, 2 Cir. 1967, 378 F.2d 420, 421-423 , cert. denied, 1967, 389 U.S. 914 , 88 S.Ct. 242 , 19 L.Ed.2d 262 ; Coil v. United States, 8 Cir. 1965, 343 F.2d 573, 576 , cert. denied, 1965, 382 U.S. 821 , 86 S.Ct. 48 , 15 L.Ed.2d 67 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theodore Roosevelt Harris
(2×)
See Tyler v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 397 F.2d 565 , cert. denied, 394 U.S. 917 , 89 S.Ct. 1187 , 22 L.Ed.2d 450 ; Grant v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966, 368 F.2d 658 ; Estes v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 335 F.2d 609 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 964 , 85 S.Ct. 656 , 13 L.Ed.2d 559 ; accord, Cardarella v. United States, 8 Cir. 1967, 375 F.2d 222 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 129 , 19 L.Ed.2d 176 ; Hines v. United States, 10 Cir. 1966, 365 F.2d 649 ; United States v. Breland, 2 Cir. 1967, 376 F.2d 721 ; see generally, Holt v. United States, 1910, 218 U.S. 245 , 31 S.Ct. 2 , 54 L.Ed. 102…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Marquez, A/K/A \Spanish Raymond\""
See United States v. Caci, 401 F.2d 664, 672 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied as to defendants Caci and Cino, 394 U.S. 917 , 89 S.Ct. 1180 , 22 L.Ed.2d 450 rev’d on other grounds as to defendants Natarelli and Randacci, 394 U.S. 310 , 89 S.Ct. 1163 , 22 L.Ed.2d 297 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marquez
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Caci, 401 F.2d 664, 672 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied as to defendants Caci and Cino, 394 U.S. 917 , 89 S.Ct. 1180, 1188 , 22 L.Ed.2d 450 , rev’d on other grounds as to defendants Natarelli and Randaccio, 394 U.S. 310 , 89 S.Ct. 1163 , 22 L.Ed.2d 297 (1969); see also United States v. De La Cruz Bellinger, 422 F.2d 723, 727 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 942 , 90 S.Ct. 1860 , 26 L.Ed.2d 278 (1970); United States v. Battaglia, 394 F.2d 304, 317 (7th Cir. 1968), rev’d on other grounds, 394 U.S. 310 , 89 S.Ct. 1163 , 22 L.Ed.2d 297 (1969); United States v. Kahn, 381 F.2…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. King
See United States v. Caci, 401 F.2d 664, 672 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 917 , 89 S.Ct. 1180 , 22 L.Ed.2d 450 (1969); United States v. Carella, 411 F.2d 729 (2d Cir. 1969); United States v. Kahn, 366 F.2d 259 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, Pacelli v. United States, 385 U.S. 948 , 87 S.Ct. 321 , 17 L.Ed.2d 226 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moses Polansky
See, United States v. Caci, 401 F.2d 664, 670 (2 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 917 , 89 S.Ct. 1188 , 22 L.Ed.2d 450 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Coppola
See United States v. Caci, 401 F.2d 664, 671 (2d Cir. 1968), petition for cert. filed, 394 U.S. 917 , 89 S.Ct. 1180 , 22 L.Ed.2d 450 .
cited
Cited "see"
Howard Ross and Bernard Ross, as Trustees for Lena Rosenbaum v. Robert A. Bernhard
See 89 S.Ct. 1190 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harvey Johnpoll
Hand, J.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 891 , 70 S.Ct. 239 , 94 L.Ed. 547 (1949); see also United States v. Caci, 401 F.2d 664, 672-73 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 917 , 89 S.Ct. 1180 , 22 L.Ed.2d 450 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Miner v. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission
It is undisputed that the CFEC did not afford Miner a hearing at all. 13 Although this is normally one of the basic components of due process, it is subject, at least in the area of administrative law, to the exception that one need not hold a hearing if there is nothing to hold a hearing about; or, more precisely, “there is no requirement, constitutional or otherwise, that there be a hearing in the absence of substantial and material issues crucial to [the] determination.” NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821, 826 (4th Cir. 1967); see also Anti-Defamation League v. FCC, 403 F.2d 169 , 171 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Henderson
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v Caci, 401 F2d 664 (CA 2, 1968), cert den 394 US 917 (1969), rev'd on other grounds sub nom Natarelli v United States in Giordano v United States, 394 US 310 ; 89 S Ct 1163 ; 22 L Ed 2d 297 (1969), involving a conspiracy to steal jewelry.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony J. Yokley
See also United States v. Caci, 401 F.2d 664 , 668 (2nd Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 917 , 89 S.Ct. 1163 , 22 L.Ed.2d 297 (1969); Garbo v. United States, 314 F.2d 718, 732 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 953 , 84 S.Ct. 1625 , 12 L.Ed.2d 498 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marquez
NOTES [1] Cf. United States v. Wolfson, Docket Nos. 33326-29, (2d Cir., Nov. 11, 1970). [2] As to these different situations it has been observed: "There is no reason to think that a co-defendant would be any more willing to waive his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination when called as a witness at a separate trial than he would be willing not to insist upon his privilege as a defendant not to take the stand." Gorin v. United States, 313 F.2d 641, 645-646 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963); see also United States v. Caci, 401 F.2d 664…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ross, Trustees
v.
Bernhard
v.
Bernhard
No. 992.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 24, 1969.
William E. Haudek for petitioners., Marvin Schwartz for respondents Clark et al., William J. Manning for respondents Bernhard et al., and E. Roger Frisch for respondent Lehman Corp.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.