green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Raisley v. Sullivan
But see, Halliday v. United States, 394 US 831 , 89 S Ct 1498 , 23 L Ed 2d 16 , rehearing denied 395 US 971 , 89 S Ct 2106 , 23 L Ed 2d 761 (1969); North Carolina v. Alford, supra, 400 US at 29 n 3. ④ The court assured Shouse he could always dismiss the court-appointed attorney and told him that conflicts sometimes required another appointment. ⑤ Raisley’s prior record included grand theft auto, burglary, petty theft, escape from a penal institution. ⑥ In fact, he was 19 years old, which obviously was not apparent to the court or further questions would have been put to him about his a…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Flauaus
See Hanger v. United States, 398 F.2d 91 (8th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1119 , 89 S.Ct. 995 , 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1969), rehearing denied, 395 U.S. 971 , 89 S.Ct. 2106 , 23 L.Ed.2d 761 (1969), which upheld the validity of a search warrant, based on Steele v. United States, supra, which named an entire apartment building although the intent was to search a single apartment and which contained an erroneous address.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Freeman v. State
See, e.g., Halliday v. United States, 380 F.2d 270 (1st Cir.1967), aff'd on other grounds, 394 U.S. 831 , 89 S.Ct. 1498 , 23 L.Ed.2d 16 , reh’g denied, 395 U.S. 971 , 89 S.Ct. 2106 , 23 L.Ed.2d 761 (1969) and Davis v. State, supra; 4 see also footnote 2, supra. We do not agree with Freeman’s argument that the judge’s statements exhibited an improper predisposition which warranted disqualification.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bearshield
(2×)
See also Halliday v. United States, 380 F.2d 270, 272 (1st Cir.1967), aff'd on other grounds, 394 U.S. 831 , 89 S.Ct. 1498 , 23 L.Ed.2d 16 (1969), reh'g denied, 395 U.S. 971 , 89 S.Ct. 2106 , 23 L.Ed.2d 761 (1970). "[T]he post-conviction act requires that the hearing be had before the same court in which the conviction took place.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Garcia
See also, Halliday v. United States, 394 U.S. 831 , 89 S.Ct. 1498 , 23 L.Ed.2d 16 (1969), reh. denied, 395 U.S. 971 , 89 S.Ct. 2106 , 23 L.Ed.2d 761 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hedberg
v.
California
v.
California
No. 2197.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 1969.
395 U.S. 971
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.