green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
9.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases · 2 courts ·
…the supreme court of the united states has appellate jurisdiction over federal questions arising either in state or federal proceedings, and by reason of the supremacy clause the decisions of that court on national law have binding effect on all lower courts whether state or fed…
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
PALMIERI VS. CLARK CO.
the supreme court of the united states has appellate jurisdiction over federal questions arising either in state or federal proceedings, and by reason of the supremacy clause the decisions of that court on national law have binding effect on all lower courts whether state or fede…
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Palmieri v. Clark County
the supreme court of the united states has appellate jurisdiction over federal questions arising either in state or federal proceedings, and by reason of the supremacy clause the decisions of that court on national law have binding effect on all lower courts whether state or fede…
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Palmieri v. Clark County
the supreme court of the united states has appellate jurisdiction over federal questions arising either in state or federal proceedings, and by reason of the supremacy clause the decisions of that court on national law have binding effect on all lower courts whether state or fede…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Donald Smith v. Wisconsin Department Of Agriculture, Trade And Consumer Protection
because lower federal courts exercise no appellate jurisdiction over state tribunals, decisions of lower federal courts are not conclusive on state courts
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Keh Tong Chen v. Attorney General of the United States
even assuming that the federal government had no right either to prevent a marriage or destroy it, ... here it has done nothing more than to say that the residence of one of the marriage partners may not be in the united states.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillips
See United States v. Local 1804—1 International Longshoremens Ass’n, 753 F.Supp. 1158, 1165 (S.D.N.Y.1990), citing United States v. De-Lutro, 435 F.2d 255, 256-57 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1658 , 29 L.Ed.2d 148 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Local 1804-1, International Longshoremen's Ass'n
See United States v. DeLutro, 435 F.2d 255, 256-57 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1658 , 29 L.Ed.2d 148 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sheri Lee McCrady
(2×)
See United States v. Nasse, 432 F.2d 1293, 1303 (7th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1657 , 29 L.Ed.2d 148 (1971); Lake v. United States, 302 F.2d 452, 456-57 (8th Cir.1962).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph R. Silvestri
See United States v. Viviano, 437 F.2d 295, 299 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1659 , 29 L.Ed.2d 149 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kish
See United States v. DeLutro, 435 F.2d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S. Ct. 1658 , 29 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Standard Alliance Industries, Inc. v. The Black Clawson Company, Standard Alliance Industries, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The Black Clawson Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See South-East Coal Co. v. Consolidation Coal Co., 434 F.2d 767, 791-92 (6th Cir. 1970), Cert. denied, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1662 , 29 L.Ed. 149 (1971) 33 There is no need to discuss Black Clawson's claim that this error would require a new trial on the liability issue as well.
cited
Cited "see"
Standard Alliance Industries, Inc. v. Black Clawson Co.
See South-East Coal Co. v. Consolidation Coal Co., 434 F.2d 767, 791-92 (6th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1662 , 29 L.Ed. 149 (1971). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Benjamin Carr, Jr.
See United States v. DeLutro, 435 F.2d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1658 , 29 L.Ed.2d 148 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clarence R. Sears, Jr.
United States v. Natale, 526 F.2d 1160, 1168 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 193 (1976); see United States v. De Lutro, 435 F.2d 255 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1658 , 29 L.Ed.2d 148 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Overseas Private Investment Corp. v. Anaconda Co.
As Justice White’s concurrence points out, the relationship between the arbitrator and the party must be “more than trivial.” Id. at 152 , 89 S.Ct. 337 (White, J., concurring); see South-East Coal Co. v. Consolidation Coal Co., 434 F.2d 767, 793 (6th Cir. 1970) cert. denied 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1662 , 29 L.Ed.2d 149 , rehearing denied, 404 U.S. 877 , 92 S.Ct. 28 , 30 L.Ed.2d 124 (1971); Fuller v. Highway Truck Drivers and Helpers Local 107, 428 F.2d 503, 508 (3d Cir. 1970); Brewery Workers Joint Local Executive Bd. v. P. Ballantine and Sons, 72 Lab.Cas. ¶ 13,925 at 27,928 (D.N.J. 197…
cited
Cited "see"
E. G. Saenz v. University Interscholastic League
See South-East Coal Co., v. Consolidation Coal Co., 6 Cir. 1970, 434 F.2d 767, 774 , cert, denied, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1662 , 29 L.Ed.2d 149 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Sanney v. Montanye
See United States v. Viviano, 437 F.2d 295, 300-301 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1659 , 29 L.Ed.2d 149 (1971); United States v. DiLorenzo, 429 F.2d 216, 219 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 950 , 91 S.Ct. 1609 , 29 L.Ed.2d 120 (1971); United States v. Knohl, 379 F.2d 427, 442 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 973 , 88 S.Ct. 472 , 19 L.Ed.2d 465 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis Nakaladski, A/K/A Louis Nash, Ettore Coco, A/K/A Eddie Coco
See United States v. DeLutro, 2 Cir. 1970, 435 F.2d 255, 256 , cert. denied, 1971, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1658 , 29 L.Ed.2d 148 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yniguez v. Arizona
See also Lawrence v. Woods, 432 F.2d 1072, 1075 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1658 , 29 L.Ed.2d 148 (1970) (holding that federal district court's decision on question of federal law was not a binding precedent for the Illinois courts). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maria-Kelly F. Yniguez Jaime P. Gutierrez v. State of Arizona, Robert D. Parks Arizonans for Official English, Applicants in Intervention-Appellants. Maria-Kelly F. Yniguez Jaime P. Gutierrez v. Rose Mofford, Individually and as Governor of the State of Arizona Robert Corbin, Individually and as Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Robert D. Parks Arizonans for Official English, Applicants in Intervention-Appellees
See also Lawrence v. Woods, 432 F.2d 1072 , 1075 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1658 , 29 L.Ed.2d 148 (1970) (holding that federal district court's decision on question of federal law was not a binding precedent for the Illinois courts) 11 Congress eliminated the provision for such appeals in 1988.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Singh v. Moyer
See, e.g., Silverman v. Rogers, 437 F.2d 102 (1st Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1667 , 29 L.Ed.2d 149 (1971); El-Omrani v. Director, USIA, 638 F.Supp. 430 (W.D.Pa.1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Vincenzo Burrafato and Antonina Burrafato v. United States Department of State and United States Immigration& Naturalization Service
See also Silverman v. Rogers, 437 F.2d 102 (1 Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 983 (1971); Swartz v. Rogers, 254 F.2d 338 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 928 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Carroll
(See United States v. Holmes (7 Cir. 1971), 452 F.2d 249 ; compare People v. Eubank, 46 Ill.2d 383 , 263 N.E.2d 869 , cert. denied, 402 U.S. 972 , 29 L.Ed.2d 136 , 91 S.Ct. 1657 ; People v. Porterfield, 131 Ill.App.2d 167 , 268 N.E.2d 537 .) It is a general rule that remarks, argument and conduct of counsel, even though improper, are not grounds for reversal of a conviction unless they cause substantial prejudice to the accused.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Solar Fuel Company v. United Mine Workers of America
See also South-East Coal Co. v. Consolidation Coal Co., 434 F.2d 767 (6th Cir. 1970) cert. den. 402 U.S. 983 , 91 S.Ct. 1662 , 29 L.Ed.2d 149 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 1041.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1971.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.