green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Farmers Ins. Co., Inc. v. Peterson
See Rosado v. Wyman, 322 F.Supp. 1173, 1180 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 437 F.2d 619 (2d Cir.1970), aff'd, 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2169 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 (1971): "Sampling has long been considered an acceptable method of determining the characteristics of a large universe. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Guidice v. Jackson
See Rothstein v. Wyman, 303 F.Supp. 339 (S.D.N.Y.1969), vacated 398 U.S. 275 , 90 S.Ct. 1582 , 26 L.Ed.2d 218 (1970), 336 F.Supp. 328 (S.D.N.Y.1970), rev’d 467 F.2d 226 (2d Cir.1972) (on relief question only), cert. denied 411 U.S. 921 , 93 S.Ct. 1552 , 36 L.Ed.2d 315 (1973) and Boddie v. Wyman, 323 F.Supp. 1189 (N.D.N.Y.1970) aff 'd, 434 F.2d 1207 (2d Cir.1970), aff 'd, 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2168 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Mowbray v. Kozlowski
See, Rosado v. Wyman, 322 F.Supp. 1173, 1193 (E.D.N.Y.1970), aff'd, 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2169 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Horton ex rel. Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District
See Rosado v. Wyman, 322 F.Supp. 1173, 1193-94 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 437 F.2d 619 (2d Cir. 1970), aff’d mem., 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2169 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District
See Rosado v. Wyman, 322 F.Supp. 1173, 1193-94 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 437 F.2d 619 (2d Cir. 1970), aff'd mem., 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2169 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Horton ex rel. Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District
See Rosado v. Wyman, E.D.N.Y.1970, 322 F.Supp. 1173, 1193-94 , aff’d, 2 Cir., 437 F.2d 619 , aff’d mem., 1971, 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2169 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Regan
When [Federal] money is spent to promote the general welfare, the concept of welfare or the opposite is shaped by Congress, not the states” (at p 645). “[T]he Federal Government * * * may impose the terms and conditions upon which its money allotments to the States shall be disbursed, and * * * any state law or regulation inconsistent with such federal terms and conditions is to that extent invalid”, subject, of course, to constitutional limitations (King v Smith, 392 US 309, 333, n 34 ; see Boddie v Wyman, 434 F2d 1207, affd 402 US 991 ; Taylor v Martin, 330 F Supp 85, 87 , affd sub nom…
cited
Cited "see"
National Treasury Employees Union v. Reagan
See Santiago v. INS, 526 F.2d 488 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 91 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Bizjak v. Blum
Accord Boddie v. Wyman, 323 F.Supp. 1189, 1193 (N.D.N.Y.), aff’d. 434 F.2d 1207 (2d Cir. 1970) aff’d. 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2168 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ruth Johnson v. Henry C. White, Commissioner of Welfare, State of Connecticut
Some other states, such as New York, have not attempted to include shelter allowances within their flat-grant programs; see Boddie v. Wyman, 434 F.2d 1207, 1211-12 (2 Cir. 1970), affirmed, 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2168 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Percy v. Brennan
See Rosado v. Wyman, 322 F.Supp. 1173, 1190-1192 (E.D.N.Y.1970), aff’d 437 F.2d 619 (2d Cir. 1971), aff’d mem., 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2169 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Roselli v. Affleck
See, Rosado v. Wyman, 322 F. Supp. 1173, 1190 (E.D.N.Y.1970) aff’d 437 F.2d 619 (2d Cir.), aff’d 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2169 , 26 L.Ed.2d 157 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
State of Georgia v. Joe Spencer, Jr., No. 31118 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Parti
See 91 S.Ct. 2167 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chaves County Home Health Services, Inc. v. Sullivan
See also Rosado v. Wyman, 322 F.Supp. 1173 (E.D.N.Y.), aff 'd, 437 F.2d 619 (2d Cir.1970), aff'd, 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2169 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 (1971); New Jersey Welfare Rights Organization v. Cahill, 349 F.Supp. 501 (D.N.J.1972) (AFDC), aff'd, 483 F.2d 723 (3d Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Arthur Treacher's Franchisee Litigation
See, e. g., Rosado v. Wyman, 322 F.Supp. 1173, 1193 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d on other grounds, 437 F.2d 619 (2d Cir. 1970), aff’d, 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2169 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Samuel TAYLOR, and the Class He Represents, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAFEWAY STORES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
See, e. g., Rosado v. Wyman, E.D.N.Y., 322 F.Supp. 1173, 1193 , aff’d on other grounds, 2 Cir., 437 F.2d 619 , aff’d, 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2169 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 (the typicality requirement was “designed to buttress the fair representation requirement in Rule 23(a)(4)”); Cohen v. District of Columbia National Bank, D.D.C., 59 F.R.D. 84, 89 (typicality is satisfied when there is a lack of adversity between the representatives and the absent class members); Taliaferro v. State Council of Higher Education, E.D.Va., 372 F.Supp. 1378, 1387 (typicality requires that the disputed issue occu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Class v. Norton
Compare Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397, 420-423 , 90 S.Ct. 1207 , 25 L.Ed.2d 442 on remand 322 F.Supp. 1173, 1196 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d 437 F.2d 619 (2d Cir. *501 1970), aff’d 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2169 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 (1971); Connecticut St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Albany Welfare Rights Organization Day Care Center, Inc. v. Francis Schreck
See also 3 Moore, Federal Practice, p15.10 (2d ed. 1968). 1 The complaint alleges that the Executive Director in question, plaintiff Catherine Boddie, is "Chairwoman of the Upstate Welfare Rights Organization and is Treasurer of the Albany Welfare Rights Organization." Typical of plaintiff Boddie's attempts to protect the rights of welfare recipients--successful in that case--is Boddie v. Wyman, 434 F.2d 1207 (2d Cir. 1970), aff'd mem., 402 U.S. 991 , 91 S.Ct. 2168 , 29 L.Ed.2d 157 (1971) 2 The majority opinion refuses to accept plaintiffs' allegation that the Department found Boddie qualified…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Spencer
v.
Georgia
v.
Georgia
No. 6945.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 20, 1971.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay and/or injunction, referred to the Court by Mr. Justice Brennan, denied.