green
Positive treatment
1.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCall Pattern Co. v. State Employment Security Board of Review
See also Strader v. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System, 206 Kan. 392 , 479 P.2d 860 , cert. denied 403 U.S. 914 (1971); Boeing Co. v. Kansas Employment Security Board of Review, 193 Kan. 287 , 392 P.2d 904 (1964); Chadwick v. Employment Security Board of Review, 192 Kan. 769, 771 , 390 P.2d 1017 (1964); Clark v. Board of Review Employment Security Division, 187 Kan. 695, 700 , 359 P.2d 856 (1961); Read v. Warkentin, Commissioner, 185 Kan. 287 , 290, 341 P.2d 980 (1959).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whitcomb, Governor of Indiana
v.
Chavis and Ruckelshaus v. Chavis
v.
Chavis and Ruckelshaus v. Chavis
No. 52; No. 53.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 1971.
Cases, Consideration, Marshall, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Appeals from D. C. S. D. Ind. dismissed. Gunn v. University Committee, 399 U. S. 383 (1970), Whitcomb v. Chavis, ante, p. 124.
Mr. Justice Marshall .took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.Reported below: 305 F. Supp. 1364.