green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Parker
See United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815 , 839 n. 34 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 737, 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Floyd F. Neyman v. United Telecommunications, Inc. United Telephone System, Inc., and United Telephone Company of Kansas
See Golay & Co. v. NLRB, 447 F.2d 290, 294-95 (7th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 (1972). 5 25 Mr. Neyman's damage presentation was extensive, and consisted of several categories of losses suffered as a result of UTC's actions. 6 The jury's charge did not include an instruction to itemize the damage award; however, UTC never objected to the format of the charge or proposed an alternative format that would have provided the specificity that they now claim was needed in order to support the award rendered. 7 26 The thrust of UTC's defense at trial was on liability, and only minor challen…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hudgeons v. Tenneco Oil Co.
See Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Grounds, 441 F.2d 704 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 951 , 92 S.Ct. 268 , 30 L.Ed.2d 267 (1971), reh’g denied, 404 U.S. 1065 , 92 S.Ct. 732 , 30 L.Ed.2d 754 (1972) (absent specific reservation, the grant of gas covers all components of gas, including non-hydrocarbon helium); Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United States, 364 F.2d 320 (Ct.Cl.1966) (a grant of “all the oil and gas deposits” included helium).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Biaggi
See United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 825 (5th Cir.1971) (“When there is a complete absence or 'spectacular’ underrepresentation of Negroes on juries, the courts have read the figures as establishing a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination____”), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972) and United States v. Gruberg, 493 F.Supp. 234, 245 (S.D.N.Y.1979) (suggesting that total exclusion or statistically substantial underrepresentation would be sufficient alone to establish a prima facie case but that a less significant disparity would have to be buttress…
discussed
Cited "see"
Gonzales v. Public Service Commission
See Gas Light Co. v. Georgia Power Co., 313 F.Supp. 860 (M.D.Ga.1970), aff'd 440 F.2d 1135 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1062 , 92 S.Ct. 732 , 30 L.Ed.2d 750 , rehearing denied, 405 U.S. 969 , 92 S.Ct. 1162 , 31 L.Ed.2d 244 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Haimowitz, Dan Scarborough, George L. Onett
See United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 843 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972) (one need receive no personal benefit to be guilty of extortion).
discussed
Cited "see"
City Of Groton v. The Connecticut Light & Power Co.
See Gas Light Co. of Columbus v. Georgia Power Co., 440 F.2d 1135, 1137-40 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1062 , 92 S.Ct. 732 , 30 L.Ed.2d 750 (1972). 9 The district court went on to hold that even if the Keogh doctrine did not apply, the municipalities had not proved any antitrust violation with respect to the terms of the 1963 contracts and R tariffs, for they "were not so devoid of reasonableness as to justify the inference that they were intended to enhance CL&P's alleged monopoly power.
cited
Cited "see"
City of Groton v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
See Gas Light Co. of Columbus v. Georgia Power Co., 440 F.2d 1135, 1137-40 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1062 , 92 S.Ct. 732 , 30 L.Ed.2d 750 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Malatesta
See United States v. Hyde, 5 Cir. 1971, 448 F.2d 815 , 839 n. 34, cert. denied, 1972, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 , and eases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Malatesta
See United States v. Hyde, 5 Cir. 1971, 448 F.2d 815 , 839 n. 34, Cert. denied, 1972, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 , and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harlan Duhon and Donald Ray Lovett
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Hyde, 5 Cir., 1971, 448 F.2d 815, 834 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972): “[t]he jury could infer that these people knew of the general pattern of extortion and sought out Hyde with the knowledge that they would have to deal with him eventually . . . 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry Lloyd Davis
See United States v. Hyde, 5 Cir., 1971, 448 F.2d 815, 847 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chastain v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
See Gas Light Co. of Columbus v. Georgia Power Co., 440 F.2d 1135 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1062 , 92 S.Ct. 732 , 30 L.Ed.2d 750 (1972); Washington Gas Light Co. v. Virginia Electric & Power Co., 438 F.2d 248 (4th Cir. 1971). 30 .
examined
Cited "see"
Texaco Inc., a Corporation v. Phillips Petroleum Company, a Corporation
(4×)
See Northern Natural Gas Company v. Grounds, 10 Cir., 441 F.2d 704 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 951 , 92 S.Ct. 268 , 30 L.Ed.2d 267 , 404 U.S. 1063 , 92 S.Ct. 732 , 30 L.Ed.2d 751 , and 404 U.S. 1065 , 92 S.Ct. 732 , 30 L.Ed.2d 754 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Capo, Tadeusz Snacki, A/K/A \Ted Snacki\"
(2×)
Yet if the defendant purports to have the power to hurt the victim in economic terms and fear is induced, the solicitation becomes an extortionate demand. 49 540 F.2d at 51 n. 11; see also United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 833 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
Compare Standard Oil Company of California v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 215 (9th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958) (requiring an established procedure “for the systematic or routine and timely making and preserving of company records”) with United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 846 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972) (informal, regularly kept notes admissible).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust Litigation
Compare Standard Oil Company of California v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 215 (9th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958) (requiring an established procedure "for the systematic or routine and timely making and preserving of company records") with United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 846 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972) (informal, regularly kept notes admissible).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marvin P. Johnson, Robert A. Wilkins, Duane Quamina, Patricia Gordon, Mark Francis Johnson
United States v. Malatesta, 583 F.2d 748 , 756 (5th Cir.1978), modified on other grounds, 590 F.2d 1379 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 1508 , 59 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979); see also United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 838 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Nelson
See also United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 825 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972), in which the court noted that “[w]hen there is a complete absence or ‘spectacular’ underrepresentation of Negroes on juries, the courts have read the figures as establishing a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination on the theory that discrimination ... is the most reasonable explanation for the composition of the jury system under scrutiny (footnote omitted).” 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kallir, Philips, Ross, Inc.
Satty v. Nashville Gas Co., 522 F.2d 850, 855 (6th Cir. 1975), petition for cert. filed, 44 U.S.L.W. 3254 (U.S. Oct. 7, 1975) (No. 75-536); see also Golay & Co. v. NLRB, 447 F.2d 290, 294-95 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 737 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bache & Co. v. Roland
See also Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Grounds, 441 F.2d 704, 715 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 951 , 92 S.Ct. 268 , 30 L.Ed.2d 267 rehearing denied, 404 U.S. 1065 , 92 S.Ct. 732 , 30 L.Ed.2d 754 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dominic Biondo and Willie Francisco Orlando
See also United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972); United States v. Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069 (2nd Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1021 , 90 S.Ct. 1258 , 25 L.Ed.2d 530 (1970).
Swenson, Warden
v.
Stidham
v.
Stidham
No. 71-224.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 1972.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.