green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hayes v. State
NOTES [1] Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). [2] The case was vacated "insofar as it leaves undisturbed the death penalty imposed... ." 408 U.S. at 845, 92 S.Ct. at 2845, 33 L.Ed.2d at 744.
discussed
Cited "see"
Losada v. State
See Dougherty , 149 So.3d at 678 (noting that the purpose of expert reports is " 'to aid and assist the Court, so as to enable the Court wisely to determine' " a defendant's competence (quoting Brown v. State , 245 So.2d 68 , 71 (Fla. 1971), vacated in part on other grounds , 408 U.S. 938 , 92 S.Ct. 2870 , 33 L.Ed.2d 759 (1972) ) ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Losada v. State
See Dougherty , 149 So.3d at 678 (noting that the purpose of expert reports is " 'to aid and assist the Court, so as to enable the Court wisely to determine' " a defendant's competence (quoting Brown v. State , 245 So.2d 68 , 71 (Fla. 1971), vacated in part on other grounds , 408 U.S. 938 , 92 S.Ct. 2870 , 33 L.Ed.2d 759 (1972) ) ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Losada v. State
See Dougherty, 149 So. 3d at 678 (noting that the purpose of expert reports is “‘to aid and assist the Court, so as to enable the Court wisely to determine’” a defendant’s competence (quoting Brown v. State, 245 So. 2d 68, 71 (Fla. 1971), vacated in part on other grounds, 408 U.S. 938 (1972))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miles v. State
(2×)
See Bartholomey v. State, 260 Md. 504, 513 , 273 A.2d 164, 169 (1971), modified, 408 U.S. 938 , 92 S.Ct. 2870 , 33 L.Ed.2d 759 (1972), reh’g denied, 409 U.S. 901 , 93 S.Ct. 180 , 34 L.Ed.2d 162 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Revere
See State v. Square, 257 La. 743 , 244 So.2d 200, 224 (1971), sentence vacated on other grounds, 408 U.S. 938 , 92 S.Ct. 2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972); State v. Wise, 434 So.2d 1308, 1312 (La.App. 3d Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
LaPuma v. State
Accord Brown v. State, 245 So.2d 68 (Fla. 1971), vacated in part, 408 U.S. 938 , 92 S.Ct. 2870 , 33 L.Ed.2d 759 (1972) (only vacating the imposition of the death penalty); Olsen v. State, 338 So.2d 225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Bolden v. State
See Bartholomey v. State, 260 Md. 504 , 273 A.2d 164 (1971), vac. in part, 408 U.S. 938 , 92 S. Ct. 2870 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Langworthy v. State
See Bartholomey v. State, 260 Md. 504, 525 , 273 A. 2d 164 (1971), vacated as to death sentence, 408 U. S. 938 (1972). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mitchell
See also, State v. Square, 257 La. 743 , 244 So.2d 200, 226 (1971), judgment vacated in part, 408 U.S. 938 , 92 S.Ct. 2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972), mandate conformed to, 263 La. 291 , 268 So.2d 229 (1972) (“Voir dire examination is designed to test the competence and impartiality of prospective jurors and may not serve to pry into their opinions concerning evidence to be offered at trial.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jacobs
See also, State v. Square, 257 La. 743 , 244 So.2d 200, 229 (1971), vacated in part by Square v. Louisiana, 408 U.S. 938 , 92 S.Ct. 2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972) (prospective juror’s past association with the Ku Klux Klan did not form a basis for a challenge for cause where he stated his prior association with the organization would not interfere with his impartial judgment in the case); Person v. Miller, 854 F.2d 656, 665 (4th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 489 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1119 , 103 L.Ed.2d 182 (1989) (no error in the trial court’s denial of a challenge for cause where a prospective …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ragland v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See Robinson, 485 U.S. at 33-34 , 108 S.Ct. at 869-70 ; Montgomery v. Commonwealth, 346 S.W.2d 479, 482 (Ky.1961) (“It seems to us apparent that when the questionable statements of the prosecuting attorney, with their attendant circumstances, are considered, they were provoked by and made in response to previous statements of the defendant’s attorney before the jury.”); Brooks v. Commonwealth, 281 Ky. 415 , 136 S.W.2d 552, 553 (1940) (“[H]e had a right to answer any argument made by defendant’s attorney.”); Rogers v. Commonwealth, 161 Ky. 754 , 171 S.W. 464, 467 (1914); cf. Thompso…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ball
See also State v. Square, 257 La. 743 , 244 So.2d 200, 226 (1971), judgment vacated in part, 408 U.S. 938 , 92 S.Ct. 2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972), mandate conformed to, 263 La. 291 , 268 So.2d 229 (1972)("Voir dire examination is designed to test the competence and impartiality of prospective jurors and may not serve to pry into their opinions concerning evidence to be offered at trial"); State v. Smith, 216 La. 1041 , 45 So.2d 617 (1950)("hypothetical questions and questions of law are not permitted in the examination of jurors which call for a pre-judgment of any supposed case on the facts")…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tilley
See also, State v. Square, 257 La. 743 , 244 So.2d 200, 226 (1971), judgment vacated in part, 408 U.S. 938 , 92 S.Ct. 2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972), mandate conformed to, 263 La. 291 , 268 So.2d 229 (1972) (" Voir dire examination is designed to test the competence and impartiality of prospective jurors and may not serve to pry into their opinions concerning evidence to be offered at trial.").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Frost
See also, State v. Square, 257 La. 743 , 244 So.2d 200, 226 (1971), judgment vacated in part, 408 U.S. 938 , 92 S.Ct. 2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972), mandate conformed to, 263 La. 291 , 268 So.2d 229 (La.1972) ("Voir dire examination is designed to test the competence and impartiality of prospective jurors and may not serve to pry into their opinions concerning evidence to be offered at trial.").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trimble v. State
See also, Bartholomey v. State, 260 Md. 504, 513 , 273 A.2d 164 (1971), vacated in part and remanded on other grounds, 408 U.S. 938 , 92 S.Ct. 2870 , 33 L.Ed.2d 759 (1972), reh’g denied, 409 U.S. 901 , 93 S.Ct. 180 , 34 L.Ed.2d 162 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morehead
v.
Ohio
v.
Ohio
No. 70-5084.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 29, 1972.
408 U.S. 938
Published
Sup. Ct. Ohio.