Daniel v. United States, 409 U.S. 843 (1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Daniel v. United States, 409 U.S. 843 (1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“one of (the act's) principal goals was that eventually the postal service would become self-sufficient: be able to operate on the revenue received from postal rates and fees without the assistance of congressional appropriations.”
169 citation events across 42 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Service, Association of American Publishers, Inc., Recording Industry Association of America, Inc., Council of Public Utility Mailers, Growers & Shippers League of Florida, Associated Third Class Mail Users, American Bankers Association, American Business Press, Inc., Magazine Publishers Association, Inc., Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc., Reader's Digest Association, Inc., American Council on Education, United Parcel Service of America, American Newspaper Publishers Association, and the National Newspaper Association, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., National Foundation March of Dimes, United Parcel Service of America, Inc., Intervenors. National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Service, (Two Cases). Time Incorporated v. United States Postal Service, Time Incorporated v. United States Postal Service. Growers and Shippers League of Florida, and Florida Gift Fruit Shippers Association v. United States Postal Service, American Newspaper Publishers Association and National Newspaper Association v. United States Postal Service, American Business Press, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, American Business Press, Inc. v. United States Postal Service. Magazine Publishers Association, Inc. v. United States Postal Service. Magazine Publishers Association, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, State of Maine, State of Indiana, State of Florida, State of Rhode Island, State of Washington, and State of Arkansas v. United States Postal Service, American Business Press, Inc., States of Utah, Iowa and Illinois, Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc., Magazine Publishers Association, Inc., Readers Digest Association, Inc., Time, Inc. & United Parcel Service of America, Inc., Association of American Publishers, Inc., Mail Order Association of America, Parcel Shippers Association, American Newspaper Publishers Association & National Newspaper Association, Dow Jones & Co., Inc., Intervenors. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Postal Service, Magazine Publishers Association, Inc., Time Incorporated, United Parcel Service of America, Inc., American Newspaper Publishers Association, National Newspapers Association, State of Connecticut, Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc., Dow Jones & Co., Inc., Intervenors (ca3, 1979-06-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Service, Association of American Publishers, Inc., Recording Industry Association of America, Inc., Council of Public Utility Mailers, Growers & Shippers League of Florida, Associated Third Class Mail Users, American Bankers Association, American Business Press, Inc., Magazine Publishers Association, Inc., Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc., Reader's Digest Association, Inc., American Council on Education, United Parcel Service of America, American Newspaper Publishers Association, and the National Newspaper Association, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., National Foundation March of Dimes, United Parcel Service of America, Inc., Intervenors. National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Service, (Two Cases). Time Incorporated v. United States Postal Service, Time Incorporated v. United States Postal Service. Growers and Shippers League of Florida, and Florida Gift Fruit Shippers Association v. United States Postal Service, American Newspaper Publishers Association and National Newspaper Association v. United States Postal Service, American Business Press, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, American Business Press, Inc. v. United States Postal Service. Magazine Publishers Association, Inc. v. United States Postal Service. Magazine Publishers Association, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, State of Maine, State of Indiana, State of Florida, State of Rhode Island, State of Washington, and State of Arkansas v. United States Postal Service, American Business Press, Inc., States of Utah, Iowa and Illinois, Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc., Magazine Publishers Association, Inc., Readers Digest Association, Inc., Time, Inc. & United Parcel Service of America, Inc., Association of American Publishers, Inc., Mail Order Association of America, Parcel Shippers Association, American Newspaper Publishers Association & National Newspaper Association, Dow Jones & Co., Inc., Intervenors. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Postal Service, Magazine Publishers Association, Inc., Time Incorporated, United Parcel Service of America, Inc., American Newspaper Publishers Association, National Newspapers Association, State of Connecticut, Direct Mail/marketing Association, Inc., Dow Jones & Co., Inc., Intervenors
3rd Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
one of (the act's) principal goals was that eventually the postal service would become self-sufficient: be able to operate on the revenue received from postal rates and fees without the assistance of congressional appropriations.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Service
D.C. Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
one of principal goals was that eventually the postal service would become self-sufficient: be able to operate on the revenue received from postal rates and fees without the assistance of congressional appropriations.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mora-Cabrera
D.P.R. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brown, 457 F.2d 731, 733 (1st Cir.) (noting, in assessing whether probable cause existed, that defendant "appeared nervous”), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972). 30 .
discussed Cited "see" U.S. v. Robinson
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bursten, 453 F.2d 605, 607-08 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 3 Robinson cites several cases from various tax contexts that hold that an unsigned Form 1040 is not a "return." Because the filing of a "return" is not an element of the crime, we need not address that issue. 5 (1972).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Sue N. Robinson
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bursten, 453 F.2d 605, 607-08 (5th Cir.1971), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Clyde E. Wilson, and Stuart Van Eman
5th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bursten v. United States, 395 F.2d 976, 981 (5th Cir.1968), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Fidencio Saenz, Domitilla Garza, Genoveva Garcia, and Norma Solis, Defendants
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bursten, 453 F.2d 605, 608 (5th Cir.1971), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); United States v. Bright, 630 F.2d 804, 824 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Smith
Cal. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
The evidence supports the jury's implicit conclusion defendant benefited and had income by receiving *1172 stock, and whether he personally benefited from his use of that stock is not the issue. [43] (64a) Was the Defense of Reliance Established as a Matter of Law? (65a) "It is a valid defense to a charge of filing a false return if a defendant provides full information regarding his taxable income and expenses to an accountant qualified to prepare... tax returns, and that the defendant adopts and files the return as prepared without having reason to believe that it is incorrect." ( United Sta…
discussed Cited "see" Warren Lechtner v. James Brownyard, D/B/A W. H. Y. P. Country Radio
3rd Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Democratic National Committee v. FCC, 460 F.2d 891 , 901-02 (D.C.Cir.), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972) (personal attack rule is a corollary of fairness doctrine); United States v. WIYN Radio, Inc., 464 F.Supp. 101 (N.D.Ga.1978); Notice of Proposed Rule Making, Personal Attack/Political Editorials, 31 Fed.Reg. 5710 (1966).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Paul D. Ylda
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bursten, 453 F.2d 605, 607 (5th Cir. 1971) (dictum), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" Williams v. State
Alaska · 1981 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Bursten, 453 F.2d 605, 610-11 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314 , 321 & n.6 (1st Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1022 , 89 S.Ct. 633 , 21 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969). .
examined Cited "see" American Security Council Education Foundation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Cbs Inc., Intervenor (6×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
D.C. Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
More recently, the Commission stated that the broadcaster "is not required to research everything it has broadcast on the subject over a considerable period of time, unless it believes it is necessary to do so in order to establish its compliance with the fairness doctrine with respect to the issue involved." Fairness Report, 48 F.C.C.2d at 20; See generally Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. FCC, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 383, 399-400 , 460 F.2d 891 , 907-08, Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972) 26 In its Broadcast Procedure Manual, 49 F.C.C.2d 1 , 5 (1974), the Commission described …
cited Cited "see" Edwards & Hanly v. Wells Fargo Securities Clearance Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. DeCarlo, 458 F.2d 358, 364-65 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 107 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); McCormick on Evidence § 295, at 696 (2d ed. 1972). 3 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Miguel Candelaria-Gonzalez and Manuel Ledesma-Ruiz
5th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bursten v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 395 F.2d 976 , cert. denied 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 .
discussed Cited "see" Elmer J. Jonnet v. Dollar Savings Bank of the City of New York (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lebowitz v. Forbes Leasing & Finance Corp., 326 F.Supp. 1335, 1352-3 (E.D.Pa.1971), aff’d, 456 F.2d 979, 982 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. den. 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 , reh. den. 409 U.S. 1049 , 93 S.Ct. 509 , 34 L.Ed.2d 502 (1972); Balter v. Bato Company, Inc., 385 F.Supp. 420 (W.D.Pa.1974).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Natale
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. DeCarlo, 458 F.2d 358 , 367 n. 12 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 107 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972). .
cited Cited "see" Simkins Ind., Inc. v. Fuld & Co., Div. of Met. Gr., Inc.
E.D. Pa. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Lebowitz v. Forbes Leasing and Finance Corporation, 326 F.Supp. 1335 (E.D.Pa.1971), aff’d 456 F.2d 979 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" Roscoe v. Butler
D. Maryland · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lebowitz v. Forbes Leasing & Finance Corp., 456 F.2d 979, 982 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972) (use of long-arm statute to secure jurisdiction over non-resident debtor not viable alternative to summary attachment because the former could result in extended litigation on whether sufficient minimum contacts existed to justify use of long-arm statute).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Heller v. Plave
S.D. Fla. · 1990 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Bursten v. United States, 395 F.2d 976, 981-982 (5th Cir.1968), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972). 4 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Brown
Conn. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 457 F.2d 731 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S. Ct. 42 , 34 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Richard G. Naas
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Wenger, 457 F.2d 1082, 1083-84 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); Borum v. United States, 409 F.2d 433, 440 (D.C.Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 916 , 89 S.Ct. 1765 , 23 L.Ed.2d 230 (1969).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Anthony Giacalone v. United States
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cir.1967), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 916 , 89 S.Ct. 1765 , 23 L.Ed.2d 230 (1969); United States v. Chiarella, 214 F.2d 838, 841 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 902 , 75 S.Ct. 226 , 99 L.Ed. 708 (1954); see also United States v. Wenger, 457 F.2d 1082, 1083-84 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jorge Lopez, United States of America v. Alexis Ramos
1st Cir. · 1983 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Bursten v. United States, 395 F.2d 976, 983-84 (5th Cir.1968), appeal after remand, 453 F.2d 605 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 44 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972) (reversing conviction and remanding for new trial where trial court’s repeated interjections were “definitely prejudicial”).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Thompson
Me. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. DeCarlo, 458 F. 2d 358, 370 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 112 , 34 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972); Ryan v. United States, 314 F.2d 306, 310 (10th Cir. 1963).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Writers Guild of America, West, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
C.D. Cal. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Democratic National Committee v. FCC, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 460 F.2d 891 , 911, cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972); Hansen v. FCC, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 100 , 413 F.2d 374, 376 (1969); cf. Unemployment Compensa *1077 tion Commission v. Aragan, 329 U.S. 143, 155 , 67 S.Ct. 245 , 91 L.Ed. 136 (1946).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." The Honorable Shirley Chisholm v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Cbs, Inc., Intervenors. Democratic National Committee v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Broadcasting Company, Inc., and Radio Television News Directors Association, Intervenors
D.C. Cir. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e. g., Democratic National Committee v. FCC, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 383, 396-397 , 460 F.2d 891, 904-905 (Tamm, J.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972); Green v. FCC, 144 U.S.App.D.C. 353, 358 , 447 F.2d 323 , 328 (1971) (Wilkey, J.).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Chisholm v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e. g., Democratic National Committee v. FCC, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 383, 396-397 , 460 F.2d 891 , 904-905 (Tamm, J.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972); Green v. FCC, 144 U.S.App.D.C. 353, 358, 447 F.2d 323 , 328 (1971) (Wilkey, J.).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Law Research Services, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Lebowitz v. Forbes Leasing & Finance Corp., 456 F.2d 979, 981 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972); U. S. Industries, Inc. v. Gregg, supra, 348 F.Supp. at 1021 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thompson v. Washington
D.C. Cir. · 1973 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Adams v. Egley, 338 F.Supp. 614 (S.D.Cal., 1972) (California Commercial Code Section 9-503, 9-504 invalidated) with Lebowitz v. Forbes Leasing and Financing Corporation, 456 F.2d 979 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 843 , 93 S.Ct. 42 , 34 L.Ed.2d 82 (1972). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daniel et ux.
v.
United States
No. 71-1393.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
409 U.S. 843
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1) · D.C. Circuit (1)

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.