green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Hodge v. Talkin
See Chief of Capitol Police v. Jeannette Rankin Brigade, 409 U.S. 972, 972 , 93 S.Ct. 311 , 34 L.Ed.2d 236 (1972). 12 2.
cited
Cited "see"
Lederman v. United States
See Chief of Capitol Police v. Jeannette Rankin Brigade, 409 U.S. 972 , 93 S.Ct. 311 , 34 L.Ed.2d 236 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Carvino
See Jeannette Rankin Brigade v. Chief of Capitol Police, 342 F.Supp. 575 (D.D.C.) (three judge court) aff'd mem., 409 U.S. 972 , 93 S.Ct. 311 , 34 L.Ed.2d 236 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Orloski v. Davis
See Kae v. Warden, 334 F.Supp. 602, 605 (E.D.Pa.l) (Pennsylvania limited voting scheme fdlection of county commissioners did not viol one man one vote doctrine.) The court also notes that intervenors’ political party dilution argument was discussed and rejected in LoFrisco v. Schaffer, 341 F.Supp. 743, 748-751 (D.Conn.) (three judge court), aff’d, 409 U.S. 972 , 93 S.Ct. 313 , 34 L.Ed.2d 236 (1972). 5 . § 13.
cited
Cited "see"
Guadalupe Guajardo, Jr., Cross-Appellants v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellees
See Jeanette Rankin Brigade v. Chief of Capitol Police, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 155 , 421 F.2d 1090 , aff’d, 409 U.S. 972 , 93 S.Ct. 311 , 34 L.Ed.2d 236 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Honorable Ronald v. Dellums v. James M. Powell, Chief, United States Capitol Police, Jerry v. Wilson, Chief, Metropolitan Police Department
(2×)
See Jeannette Rankin Brigade v. Chief of Capitol Police, 342 F.Supp. 575 (D.D.C.) (three-judge court) (McGowan, J.), aff'd, 409 U.S. 972 , 93 S.Ct. 311 , 34 L.Ed.2d 236 (1972). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hemmati v. United States
See also Jeanette Rankin Brigade v. Chief of Capitol Police, 342 F.Supp., 575, 584 (D.D.C.) (noting that the Capitol Grounds are "traditionally ... open to the public,” but "excluding such places as the Senate and House Boors, committee rooms, etc.” (emphasis added)), aff'd, 409 U.S. 972 , 93 S.Ct. 311 , 34 L.Ed.2d 236 (1972); United States v. Murphy, 114 Daily Wash.L.Rptr. 2149, 2156 (D.C.Super.Ct.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fidell
v.
Board of Elections of the City of New York
v.
Board of Elections of the City of New York
No. 72-175.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 6, 1972.
Jurisdiction, Set, Would.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. E. D. N. Y.
Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.