green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.2 score
“court will look to the facts on a case-by-case basis in the course of weighing the need for the testimony in question against the claims of the newsman that the public's right to know is impaired.”
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Sanusi
cjompelled disclosure of confidential sources ... threatens a journalist's ability to secure information
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
P. & B. Marina, L. P. v. Logrande
highly material and relevant, necessary or critical to the maintenance of the claim
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bruno & Stillman, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.
court will look to the facts on a case-by-case basis in the course of weighing the need for the testimony in question against the claims of the newsman that the public's right to know is impaired.
cited
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Classic III Inc. v. Ely
See Baker v. F & F Inv. 470 F.2d 778, 784 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Warzon v. Drew
See Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 781 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); Carey v. Hume, 492 F.2d 631 (D.C.Cir.), cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); Riley v. City of Chester, 612 F.2d 708, 715 (3d Cir.1979); Bruno & Stillman, Inc., 633 F.2d at 596-97 .
discussed
Cited "see"
American Tobacco Company v. American Tobacco Company
See Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 783, 785 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973). 66 Here, notwithstanding its view that New York law did not establish a scholar's privilege, the district court asked the tobacco companies to "[a]ssume that there is a qualified privilege," and in that context discussed the burdens of compliance.
cited
Cited "see"
Mount Sinai School of Medicine v. American Tobacco Co.
See Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 783, 785 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Sinnott v. Boston Retirement Board
See Baker v. F & F Inv., 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Subpoena Served on the California Public Utilities Commission. Southern California Edison Company, a California Corporation, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company, a California Corporation, and California Public Utilities Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Southern California Edison Company, a California Corporation San Diego Gas & Electric Company, a California Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Defendant- and California Public Utilities Commission
See Cobbledick, 309 U.S. at 327-28 , 60 S.Ct. at 542 -43 2 In addition to the cases previously cited, the treatise cites in support of its proposition Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir.1972) (review of a denial to compel discovery in the Second Circuit relating to an action pending in the Seventh Circuit), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); In re Surety Ass'n of Am., 388 F.2d 412 (2d Cir.1967) (review of an order denying a motion to compel a nonparty to comply with a subpoena duces tecum issued in the Second Circuit relating to a case pending in t…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ott v. St. Luke Hospital of Campbell County, Inc.
See Baker v. F&F Investment Co., 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. den. 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); Robinson v. Magovem, 83 F.R.D. 79 (W.D.Pa.1979); Lora v. City of New York Board of Education, 74 F.R.D. 565 (E.D.N.Y.1977); United States v. King, 73 F.R.D. 103 (E.D.N.Y.1976); Baylor v. Mading — Dugan Drug Co., 57 F.R.D. 509 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Senear v. Daily Journal-American
(2×)
See Baker v. F & F Inv., 470 F.2d 778, 784-85 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 (1973); Gilbert v. Allied Chem.
cited
Cited "see"
Zerilli v. Bell
See Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1972) , cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony Herbert v. Barry Lando, Mike Wallace, Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., Atlantic Monthly Company, Barry Lando, Mike Wallace and Cbs Inc.
(2×)
See Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 785 (2d Cir. 1972) (Kaufman J.), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973). 23 See, e. g., Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 611-14 , 93 S.Ct. 2908 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973) (relaxed standing rules to challenge statutes allegedly violative of the First Amendment); Baker v. F & F Investment, supra, 470 F.2d at 783 (rejecting disclosure of journalists' sources in civil rights case except under limited circumstances) 24 Indeed, in Sullivan the Court qualified those standards by the self-imposed procedural limitation that it wo…
cited
Cited "see"
Altemose Const. Co. v. BLDG. & CONST. TRADES COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA
See Baker v. F. & F. Investment, 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Casino Foods Corporation v. Kraftco Corporation
See Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sterling v. Wyrick
See Gomori v. Brierley, 334 F.Supp. 672 (W.D.Pa.1971), aff’d 474 F.2d 1338 , cert. denied 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 ; Hibbard v. Gladden, 368 F.2d 311 (D.Ore.1966); Miller v. Crouse, 346 F.2d 301 (10th Cir. 1965); Olson v. Tahash, 344 F.2d 139 (8th Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 858 , 86 S.Ct. 113 , 15 L.Ed.2d 96 .
cited
Cited "see"
Richards of Rockford, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
See generally Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778 (2 Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Solarex Corporation and Rca Corporation v. Arco Solar, Inc. v. The American Physical Society
The standard of review in that circuit of a discovery ruling is whether Arco has made a “clear showing of abuse of discretion.” Robertson v. National Basketball Ass’n, 622 F.2d 34, 35-36 (2d Cir.1980); see also Baker v. F & F Inv., 470 F.2d 778, 781 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gould Inc. v. Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co.
See, e.g., Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 781 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gould Inc. v. Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd.
See, e.g., Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 781 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973). 12 Nevertheless, in this case we have no basis upon which to review the district court's order.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated January 4, 1984
See, e.g., Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 780-83 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76-77 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 146-49 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1126 , 101 S.Ct. 945 , 67 L.Ed.2d 113 (1981); Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 436-38 (10th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maressa v. New Jersey Monthly
(2×)
See, e.g., Baker v. F. & F. Investment, 470 F.2d 778, 785 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. den., 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); Democratic National Committee v. McCord, 356 F.Supp. 1394 (D.D.C.1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Anthony T. Zerilli and Michael Polizzi v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United States Anthony J. Zerilli v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United States
See, e. g., Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); Carter v. Baltimore & Ohio R.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zerilli v. Smith
See, e. g., Baker v. F & F Investment, 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); Carter v. Baltimore & Ohio R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCracken v. United States
See, e. g., Johnson v. Chafee, 469 F.2d 1216, 1218-19 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2146 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973); Friedberg v. Resor, 453 F.2d 935, 937 (2d Cir. 1971); Nixon v. Secretary of the Navy, 422 F.2d 934, 939 (2d Cir. 1970). 62 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company
(2×)
And in Carey v. Hume, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 365, 369 , 492 F.2d 632 , 636, cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974), this court, before upholding an order of disclosure in a civil libel suit, adopted as its approach one in which “the court will look to the facts on a case-by-case basis in the course of weighing the need for the testimony in question against the claims of the newsman that the public’s right to know is impaired.” In Carey the court found that the information sought “appears to go to the heart of appellee’s libel action,” id; compare Baker v. F…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Alan Borschowa, Cross-Appellee v. W. Graham Claytor, Jr., Secretary of the Navy, Cross-Appellants. Nos. 76-2370, 76-2438
Compare Johnson v. Chafee, 469 F.2d 1217 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2146 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973), and Wallace v. Chafee, 451 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 933 , 93 S.Ct. 242 , 34 L.Ed.2d 188 (1972), with Novak v. Rumsfeld, 423 F.Supp. 971 (N.D.Cal.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph C. Vispi
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Saglimbene, 471 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2146 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973) (six years from trial to indictment); United States v. Infanti, supra (28 months); United States v. Fasanaro, 471 F.2d 717 (2d Cir. 1973) (four years); but see United States v. Roberts, supra (16 months held unreasonable); United States v. Calloway, 164 U.S.App.D.C. 204 , 505 F.2d 311 (1974) (15 months unreasonable). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lobue
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 72-1175.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 7, 1973.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (2) · First Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.