Chatman v. Arizona, 414 U.S. 1010 (1973). · Go Syfert
Chatman v. Arizona, 414 U.S. 1010 (1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1984 · …there is no inconsistency between a present failure of memory and a past existence of memory ⚠ not in text
26 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Daye (mass, 1984-09-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Daye (2×)
Mass. · 1984 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
there is no inconsistency between a present failure of memory and a past existence of memory
cited Cited "see" State v. Gonzales
N.M. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Collins, 478 F.2d 837, 838 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1010 , 94 S.Ct. 373 , 38 L.Ed.2d 248 (1973).
cited Cited "see" State v. Perea
Ariz. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Chatman, 109 Ariz. 275 , 508 P.2d 739 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1010 , 94 S.Ct. 373 , 38 L.Ed.2d 247 (1973).
cited Cited "see" Kendall v. United States
E.D.N.Y · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. United States, 481 F.2d 339, 346 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1010 , 94 S.Ct. 373 , 38 L.Ed.2d 248 (1974).
cited Cited "see" State v. Dault
Wash. Ct. App. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Collins, 478 F.2d 837 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1010 , 38 L.
cited Cited "see" United States v. John Alexander Beathune and Rudy Rhodes
10th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Antonick, 481 F.2d 935 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1010 , 94 S.Ct. 374 , 38 L.Ed.2d 248 (1973), where the Ninth Circuit rejected the identical argument.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re the Comprehensive Investigation of the School District of Newark
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., United States v. Antonick, 481 F.2d 935, 937 (9th Cir.) (no federal rule requires that a stenographer be present during grand jury proceedings), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 1010 , 94 S.Ct. 374 , 38 L.Ed.2d 248 (1973); Bowles v. Baer, 142 F. 2d 787, 788-89 (7th Cir.1944) (stenographer not required to be present during testimony given as part of investigation by the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration); Torras v. Stradley, 103 F.Supp. 737, 740 (N.D.Ga.1951) (witness testifying before investigation of a Special Agent of the Bureau of Internal Revenue not entitled to the prese…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Clabourne
Ariz. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Chat-man, 109 Ariz. 275 , 508 P.2d 739 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1010 , 94 S.Ct. 373 , 38 L.Ed.2d 247 (1973) (photographs of the victim were properly admitted despite the fact that the defendant was willing to stipulate to identification and that the murder was committed in a brutal fashion).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chatman
v.
Arizona
No. 73-5286.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 5, 1973.
414 U.S. 1010

Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.