green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Tiidee Products, Inc., Intervenor(two Cases). Tiidee Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor (Two Cases)
See text accompanying note 33 supra 40 Our limitation on the legal expenses recoverable by the Union does detract somewhat from the implicit balancing process in which the Board appears to have engaged, but we think that the clear dictates of the law, combined with the additional affirmative actions required of the Company, satisfactorily resolve the complex of problems presented in this case 41 Tiidee Products, Inc., 194 NLRB 1234 , 1236 (1972) 42 Id 43 Food Store Employees Union, Local No. 347 v. NLRB, 155 U.S.App.D.C. 101, 107 , 476 F.2d 546, 552 , cert. granted, 414 U.S. 1062 , 94 S.Ct. 56…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Depositors Trust Co. v. Hudson General Corp.
Thus, the court must make its “best estimate” of what the State court — here a Maine court — would rule to be its law, In re Leasing Consultants Inc., 592 F.2d 103, 109 (2 Cir. 1979); Marina Management Corp. v. Brewer, 572 F.2d 43,46 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 104 , 58 L.Ed.2d 123 (1978), and is justified in looking to the law of other jurisdictions, particularly that of New York, for support, see Ricciuti v. Voltarc Tubes, Inc., 277 F.2d 809, 812 (2 Cir. 1960); see also Schein v. Chasen, 478 F.2d 817, 821 (2 Cir. 1973), vacated on other grounds, 414 U.S. 1062 , 94…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Record Pressing Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
See also Schein v. Chasen, 478 F.2d 817 (2d Cir. 1973) vacated 414 U.S. 1062 , 94 S.Ct. 568 , 38 L.Ed.2d 467 (1974); Holt v. Seversky Eleetronatom Co., 452 F.2d 31 (2d Cir. 1971); Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co., 412 F.Supp. 1392 (1st Cir. 1976); 1A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 0.309[2].
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cardwell, Warden
v.
Lewis
v.
Lewis
No. 72-1603.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1973.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted.