green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
Anthony Herbert v. Barry Lando, Mike Wallace, Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., Atlantic Monthly Company, Barry Lando, Mike Wallace and Cbs Inc.
(3×)
But see Carey v. Hume, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 365 , 492 F.2d 631 (1974), cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974) (court ordered disclosure of a confidential source where the allegedly libelous statement was based entirely on confidential sources and the plaintiff had no way of proving falsity or reckless disregard without knowledge of the identity of those sources).
discussed
Cited "see"
Canadian Shield Financial Corp. v. Estate of Deutscher (In Re Vincent)
(Ancillary jurisdiction over discharged debtors suit to have debts declared discharged); Wesley Medical Center v. Wallace, (In re Wallace), 46 B.R. 802, 804 (Bankr.W.D.Mo.1984); (power to decide contempt order even where debtor disobeyed previous court order and later dismissed case); see Ohio Hoist Manufacturing Co. v. LiRocchi, 490 F.2d 105, 108 (6th Cir.1974), ce rt. dismissed 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974), (district court has jurisdiction to decide state law claims arising from violation of federal statute which provides no remedy).
cited
Cited "see"
Air Transport Ass'n of America v. Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization
See Ohio Hoist Manufacturing Co. v. LiRocchi, 490 F.2d 105, 108-09 (6th Cir.) (appendix summarizing legislative history), cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization (Patco)
See Ohio Hoist Manufacturing Co. v. LiRocchi, 490 F.2d 105, 108-09 (6th Cir.) (appendix summarizing legislative history), cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tavoulareas v. Piro
When the question arises in a libel action “and successful assertion of the privilege will effectively shield [the defendants] from liability, the equities weigh somewhat more heavily in favor of disclosure.” Zerilli v. Smith , at 714; see Carey v. Hume, 492 F.2d 631, 637 (D.C.Cir.), cert, dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hubbard
See Carey v. Hume, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 365 , 492 F.2d 631 (D.C.Cir.1972), cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Nixon
Moreover, the alleged political motive behind the surveillance of the Smiths further calls into question the actions of appellees 35 Branzburg v. Hayes, supra note 33 , 408 U.S. at 707-708 , 92 S.Ct. at 2670 36 436 U.S. 547, 570 , 98 S.Ct. 1970, 1984 , 56 L.Ed.2d 525 (1978) (Powell, J., concurring); See Carey v. Hume, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 365, 370 , 492 F.2d 631, 636 , Cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974) 37 Smith v. Nixon, supra note 19, 449 F.Supp. at 327 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Nixon
Branzburg v. Hayes, supra note 33, 408 U.S. at 707-708 , 92 S.Ct. at 2670. . 436 U.S. 547, 570 , 98 S.Ct. 1970, 1984 , 56 L.Ed.2d 525 (1978) (Powell, J., concurring); see Carey v. Hume, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 365, 370 , 492 F.2d 631, 636 , cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert J. Febre
See also Ohio Hoist Manufacturing Co. v. Lirocchi, 490 F.2d 105, 107 (6th Cir.1974) (section 1963 was "adopted to protect both judgment creditors and judgment debtors from the additional cost and harassment of further litigation which otherwise would be incident to an action on the judgment in a foreign district"), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 938 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hatchard v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.
(2×)
Compare Branzburg, supra, and Garland v. Torre, 259 F.2d 545 (2nd Cir. 1958), cert. denied 358 U.S. 910 , 79 S.Ct. 237 , 3 L.Ed.2d 231 (1958) with Carey v. Hume, 492 F.2d 631 (D.C.Cir. 1974), cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974). [20] *51 In the instant cases, the cogent argument for the application of a qualified privilege is that the dissemination of information to the public would flow less freely if the press's confidential communicants were not assured of their anonymity, or if information revealing their identities was disclosed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coughlin, James and Coughlin, Patricia, His Wife v. Westinghouse Broadcasting and Cable Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Carey v. Hume, 492 F.2d 631, 634 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); id. at 640 (MacKinnon, J., concurring); DeRoburt v. Gannett Co., Inc., 507 F.Supp. 880, 884 (D.Hawaii 1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Contempt of Wright
See also Carey v. Hume, 492 F.2d 631, 636-37 (D.C.Cir.), cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705 , 7 Media L.Rptr. 1121, 1127 (D.C.Cir.1981); Baker v. F & F Inv., 470 F.2d 778, 783-84 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 966 , 93 S.Ct. 2147 , 36 L.Ed.2d 686 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Mecklenburg County
See, e.g., Carey v. Hume, 492 F.2d 631 , cert. denied 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705 (D.C.Cir.1981); Bruno & Stillman, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co., 633 F.2d 583 (1st Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schultz v. Reader's Digest Ass'n
See e. g., Carey v. Hume, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 365 , 492 F.2d 631 (1974), cert. dismissed 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); Garland v. Torre, 259 F.2d 545 (2nd Cir. 1958); Anderson v. Nixon, 444 F.Supp. 1195 (D.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company
(2×)
See, e. g., Carey v. Hume, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 365 , 492 F.2d 632 , cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); Tribune Publishing Co. v. Caldero, 98 Idaho 288 , 562 P.2d 791 (1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 930 , 98 S.Ct. 418 , 54 L.Ed.2d 291 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lueg v. Tewell
Compare Ramsay v. Santa Rosa Medical Center, 498 S.W.2d 741 (Tex.Civ.App.—San Antonio 1973, writ ref’d n. r. e.), cert. den. 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 3062 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Apicella v. McNeil Laboratories, Inc.
(2×)
See also Carey v. Hume, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 365 , 492 F.2d 631 , cert. pet. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938 , 94 S.Ct. 2654 , 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); Adams v. Assoc.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ramsay
v.
Santa Rosa Medical Center
v.
Santa Rosa Medical Center
No. 73-1554.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 1974.
417 U.S. 938
Published
Appeal from Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 4th Sup. Jud. Dist., dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.