green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Wright v. Associates Financial Services Co.
See Brown v. U.S. Nat’l Bank, 265 Or 234 , 509 P2d 442 (1973); see also Shirley v. State National Bank of Connecticut, 493 F2d 739 (2d Cir), cert den 419 US 1009 (1974); Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, 492 F2d 324 (9th Cir 1973), cert den 419 US 1006 *694 (1974); Brunswick Corporation v. J & P, Inc., 424 F2d 100 (10th Cir 1970); Garfinkle v. Superior Court, 21 Cal3d 268, 146 Cal Rptr 208, 578 P2d 925 , appeal dismissed 439 US 949 (1978), Kennebec v. Bank of the West, 88 Wash 2d 718, 565 P2d 812 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Babbitt Ford, Inc.
See Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, 492 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 282 (1974), holding that prejudgment self-help repossession authorized by state statute does not involve “state action.” 4 . 28 U.S.C. § 1738 (1966) provides in part: “The Acts of the legislature of any State, Territory, or Possession of the United States or copies thereof, shall be authenticated by affixing the sale of such State, Territory or Possession thereto.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gilbert Parks v. \Mr. Ford\" D/B/A Ford's Speed Shop William Muldowney
See 218 Kan. at 147-148 , 542 P.2d at 1046 11 The distinction between liens created by law and liens created by private contract permitted by law was recognized by the Ninth Circuit in Culbertson v. Leland, 528 F.2d 426, 429 (9th Cir. 1975), in distinguishing its holding in Adams v. Southern California State National Bank, 492 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 282 (1974), that contractual self-help repossession did not involve state action Candor requires the disclosure that the author of this opinion has always contended that Gibbs v. Titelman w…
discussed
Cited "see"
Carlos Melara v. James J. Kennedy
See Culbertson v. Leland, 528 F.2d 426, 431 (1975), and Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, 492 F.2d 324, 330 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 282 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph A. Bryant v. Jefferson Federal Savings and Loan Association
See Nowlin v. Professional Auto Sales, Inc., 496 F.2d 16 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974); Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, 492 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 282 (1974). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terry L. Arcoren v. Wenton Peters and John Schooler
(2×)
Since then, however, the courts have almost uniformly upheld statutes allowing a creditor to proceed by self-help. 4 In Bichel Optical Laboratories, Inc. v. Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis, 487 F.2d 906 (8th Cir.1973), this court distinguished the state action involved in the Fuentes replevin procedure from the U.C.C.’s self-help remedy, which “involve[s] only private actions arising out of the express written agreements between the parties.” Id. at 907; see also Adams v. Southern Cal. First Nat'l Bank, 492 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1973), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
De Malherbe v. International Union of Elevator Constructors
See also Adams v. Southern California Nat'l Bank, 492 F.2d 324, 338 (9 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , *664 42 L.Ed.2d 282 (1974); Hines v. Cenla Community Action Comm., Inc., 474 F.2d 1052, 1059 (5 Cir. 1973) (Wisdom, J., dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawson v. Smith
See also Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, 492 F.2d 324, 330 (9 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 , 95 S.Ct. 325 , 42 L.Ed.2d 282 (1974) (test for “state action” is whether action of the state is “significant”), decided subsequent to Garfinkle .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adams
v.
Southern California First National Bank
v.
Southern California First National Bank
No. 73-1842.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 11, 1974.
Certiorari.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Ford Motor Credit Co. et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.