green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
ASS'N OF CONTRACTING PLUMBERS OF NYC v. Local No. 2
Gurton v. Arons, 339 F.2d 371, 375 (2d Cir.1964); accord, Sheldon v. O'Callaghan, 497 F.2d 1276, 1281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 , 95 S.Ct. 681 , 42 L.Ed.2d 682 (1974); Felton v. Ullman, 629 F.Supp. 251, 254-55 (S.D.N.Y.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Association of Contracting Plumbers of City of New York, Inc. v. Local Union No. 2 United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry
Gurton v. Arons, 339 F.2d 371, 375 (2d Cir.1964); accord, Sheldon v. O’Callaghan, 497 F.2d 1276, 1281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 , 95 S.Ct. 681 , 42 L.Ed.2d 682 (1974); Felton v. Ullman, 629 F.Supp. 251, 254-55 (S.D.N.Y.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Felton v. Ullman
Gurton v. Arons, 339 F.2d 371, 375 (2d Cir.1964); accord Sheldon v. O’Callaghan, 497 F.2d 1276, 1281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 , 95 S.Ct. 681 , 42 L.Ed.2d 682 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Sombrotto
Accord Sheldon v. O’Callaghan, 497 F.2d 1276, 1281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 , 95 S.Ct. 681 , 42 L.Ed.2d 682 (1974). *131 The provisions of the L.M.R.D.A. were not intended by Congress to constitute an invitation to the courts to intervene at will in the internal affairs of unions.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Brian Russell
(2×)
See United States v. Nunez-Villalobos, 500 F.2d 1023 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 , 95 S.Ct. 682 , 42 L.Ed.2d 683 (1974); United States v. Jaime-Barrios, 494 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 972 , 94 S.Ct. 3178 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1143 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
W. J. Usery v. International Organization Of Masters, Mates And Pilots
See Sheldon v. O'Callaghan, 497 F.2d 1276 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 , 95 S.Ct. 681 , 42 L.Ed.2d 682 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Usery v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots, International Maritime Division
See Sheldon v. O’Callaghan, 497 F.2d 1276 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 , 95 S.Ct. 681 , 42 L.Ed.2d 682 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carol Olden v. Internal Revenue Service, Carol Olden Kolden K. Gopher v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Yakima County State of Washington United States of America City of Seattle Cowlitz Indian Tribe Norwegian Ministry Ford Motor Credit Company
O'Loughlin, 920 F.2d at 616 ; see also Venable v. Meyers, 500 F.2d 1215, 1216 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) (denying plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis where he gave away the majority of his assets after action was filed against him), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 (1974). 4 Here, in her applications to proceed in forma pauperis, Olden stated that (1) she was receiving $1,152 per month in Social Security benefits for herself and $384 per month for her child, (2) she received approximately $2,500 in child support from June to October 1991, and (3) she had $1,000 worth of family heirlooms.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sandor Sipos, Dba Sa Si MacHine Tools v. William B. Williamson
O'Loughlin, 920 F.2d at 616 ; see also Venable v. Meyers, 500 F.2d 1215, 1216 (9th Cir.) (plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis denied where he gave away the majority of his assets after action was filed against him), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 (1974) (per curiam). 4 Here, in his application to proceed in forma pauperis, Sipos stated that he receives $1,095 per month in government benefits.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Iman Visarraga v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary, Secretary of the Navy
O'Loughlin, 920 F.2d at 616 ; see also Venable v. Meyers, 500 F.2d 1215, 1216 (9th Cir.) (plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis denied where he gave away the majority of his assets after an action was filed against him), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 (1974). 4 Here, Visarraga, who was receiving temporary disability benefits, submitted an affidavit which stated that: (1) she received a total of $2,981.09 dollars from the Department of Labor during the four month period which preceded the filing of her suit; (2) she had $2,186.11 dollars in a savings account and $944.05 dollars in a che…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Kay
See Cotter v. Owens, 753 F.2d at 228 (under extreme circumstances, action against officer can be “'a form of intimidation of the membership’ ” and affects members’ LMRDA rights) (quoting Schonfeld v. Penza, 477 F.2d at 90 ); see also Sheldon v. O’Callaghan, 497 F.2d 1276, 1282 (2d Cir.) (finding jurisdiction under LMRDA where alleged officers breached their duty to conduct fair referendum on new constitution), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 , 95 S.Ct. 681 , 42 L.Ed.2d 682 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Kay
See Cotter v. Owens, 753 F.2d at 228 (under extreme circumstances, action against officer can be " 'a form of intimidation of the membership' " and affects members' LMRDA rights) (quoting Schonfeld v. Penza, 477 F.2d at 90 ); see also Sheldon v. O'Callaghan, 497 F.2d 1276, 1282 (2d Cir.) (finding jurisdiction under LMRDA where alleged officers breached their duty to conduct fair referendum on new constitution), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 , 95 S.Ct. 681 , 42 L.Ed.2d 682 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murphy v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18
See also Sheldon v. O’Callaghan, 497 F.2d 1276 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 , 95 S.Ct. 681 , 42 L.Ed.2d 682 (1974), holding that while the LMRDA requires the union to give dissidents some means of reaching union members with their views, those means need not invariably include access to a union newspaper.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William F.. Murphy v. International Union Of Operating Engineers, Local 18
See also Sheldon v. O'Callaghan, 497 F.2d 1276 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 , 95 S.Ct. 681 , 42 L.Ed.2d 682 (1974), holding that while the LMRDA requires the union to give dissidents some means of reaching union members with their views, those means need not invariably include access to a union newspaper. 90 Here Judge Lambros found that the dissidents had not made any request to have literature mailed to union members at the dissidents' expense and that Local 18 had not used its membership list discriminatorily.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New Watch-Dog Committee v. New York City Taxi Drivers Union, Local 3036
See also Sheldon v. O’Callaghan, 497 F.2d 1276 , 1283 n.9 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1090 , 95 S.Ct. 681 , 42 L.Ed.2d 682 (1974) (the “equal rights and privileges” guarantee of LMRDA §§ 101 and 102, 29 U.S.C. §§ 411 (a) and 412, held applicable as jurisdictional base when the defendant union allegedly undermined the fairness of a pending referendum by denying plaintiffs access to membership lists and by presenting biased coverage in union newspaper).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
O'Callaghan
v.
Sheldon and Sheldon v. O'Callaghan
v.
Sheldon and Sheldon v. O'Callaghan
No. 74-483.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 23, 1974.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 497 F. 2d 1276.