Stull v. United States, 423 U.S. 1059 (1976). · Go Syfert
Stull v. United States, 423 U.S. 1059 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
207 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 50 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Gambino (nysd, 1990-04-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Gambino
S.D.N.Y. · 1990 · confidence medium
Affidavits should not be read “with the same microscopic intensity as municipal bond counsel would a bond indenture.” United States v. Pond, 523 F.2d 210, 214 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1058 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 *1099 (1976).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Kulvinder Jaswal, Yousef Rouhani and Mohammad Shahnavazy
2d Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Canniff, 521 F.2d 565, 571 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 796 , 46 L.Ed.2d 650 (1976).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Vickie J. Wylie (4×)
5th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McCoy, 515 F.2d 962, 964 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 795 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976). 55 It is also not a corruption of the jury function to have juries decide whether a defendant's handwriting matches that in another document.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Molina-Chacon (2×)
E.D.N.Y · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wolfish, 525 F.2d 457, 463 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976); Brulay v. United States, 383 F.2d 345, 348 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 986 , 88 S.Ct. 469 , 19 L.Ed.2d 478 (1967).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Nathaniel Brooks (2×)
7th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Stull, 521 F.2d 687, 690 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976); United States v. Joyce, 499 F.2d 9, 18 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1031 , 95 S.Ct. 512 , 42 L.Ed.2d 306 (1974); United States v. Ellicott, 336 F.2d 868 , 870-71 (4th Cir.1964); United States v. Browne, 225 F.2d 751, 756 (7th Cir.1955); United States v. Baker, 50 F.2d 122, 123-24 (2d Cir. 1931).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Blohm (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Wolfish, 525 F.2d 457, 463 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976); United States v. Halbert, 640 F.2d 1000, 1009 (9th Cir.1981).
cited Cited "see" John Gibilaro v. Eugene Le Fevre
2d Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Canniff, 521 F.2d 565, 571 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 796 , 46 L.Ed.2d 650 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" Whalen v. State
Del. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Chambers, Mo.Supr., 524 S.W.2d 826 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1058 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976), overruled on federal constitutional grounds, State v. Morgan, supra, 592 S.W.2d at 801. 14 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Lace
D. Vt. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pond, 523 F.2d 210, 214 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1058, 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Daniel J. Ledesma (2×)
7th Cir. · 1980 · signal: accord · confidence high
The court concluded that “Regardless of the possibility of delivery by hand, the fact is that instruments essential to the consummation of the fraud, the false claims and misrepresentations relied upon by the insurance companies, were mailed, and the defendant could reasonably have foreseen that the mails would be used.” Id.; accord, United States v. Stull, 521 F.2d 687 (6 Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976) (the court ruled that it was immaterial that mailed checks could have been hand delivered or otherwise forwarded).
discussed Cited "see" Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,308, 2 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1257 United States of America v. David Stirling, Jr., William G. Stirling, Harold M. Yanowitch, Edwin J. Schulz and Rubel L. Phillips
2d Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b); see United States v. Canniff, 521 F.2d 565, 572 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 796 , 46 L.Ed.2d 650 (1976); United States v. Perez, 426 F.2d 1073, 1081 (2d Cir. 1970), aff'd, 402 U.S. 146 , 91 S.Ct. 1357 , 28 L.Ed.2d 686 (1971). 143 Miscellany. 144 The Stirlings and Yanowitch make five additional arguments that we now consider briefly.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Stirling
2d Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b); see United States v. Canniff, 521 F.2d 565, 572 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 796 , 46 L.Ed.2d 650 (1976); United States v. Perez, 426 F.2d 1073, 1081 (2d Cir. 1970), aff’d, 402 U.S. 146 , 91 S.Ct. 1357 , 28 L.Ed.2d 686 (1971).
examined Cited "see" MacIo Ennis v. E. Lefevre, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent (4×)
2d Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
“Obviously, however, those rights cannot be both exercised at the same time.” United States v. Mitchell, 137 F.2d 1006, 1010 , aff’d on rehearing, 138 F.2d 831 (2d Cir. 1943), cert. denied, 321 U.S. 794 , 64 S.Ct. 785 , 88 L.Ed. 1083 (1944); see United States v. Wolfish, 525 F.2d 457 , 462-63 & n. 2 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976). 4 A defendant who elects to be represented by counsel surrenders the right to make the ultimate decision on a wide variety of matters.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mark Bruce Astroff and Robert Duane Steverson (2×)
5th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pond, 523 F.2d 210, 213 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1058 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Angelo Ricco
2d Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Canniff, 521 F.2d 565, 571-73 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 796 , 46 L.Ed.2d 650 (1976); United States v. Tramunti, supra, 513 F.2d at 1118-19.
discussed Cited "see" Rogers v. State (2×)
Ark. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Caniff, 521 F. 2d 565 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S. Ct. 796 , 46 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Rivera (2×)
unknown court · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
The court declines to consider the Mr. Rivera’s pro se brief, because Mr. Rivera . has presented no "compelling reason” for the court to permit this so-called "hybrid representation.” United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1141 (2d Cir. 1989); see also United States v. Wolfish, 525 F.2d 457, 462 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976) (finding that defendant "had an experienced counsel and, so long as he retained him, he could not appear pro se"); United States v. Muyet, 985 F.Supp. 440, 441 (S.D.N.Y.1998) (denying defendant's motion to submit …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Robert Deleon (2×)
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Pond, 523 F.2d 210, 212 (2d Cir.1975) (holding that "smell alone may justify issuance of a warrant if the affiant is qualified to know the odor and the odor is distinctive.") (emphasis added), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1058 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976). 23 We hold that a warrant cannot be based on the claim of an untrained or inexperienced person to have smelled growing plants which have no commonly recognized odor.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Wolf Jacobowitz, A/K/A \Jack Rice (2×)
unknown court · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Doe, 405 F.2d at 438-39 (refusal to provide handwriting exemplars is admissible); see also United States v. Wolfish, 525 F.2d 457, 461 (2d Cir.1975) (effort to disguise handwriting is admissible), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Stanley Friedman, Michael Lazar, Lester Shafran, and Marvin Kaplan, Defendants
2d Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Canniff 521 F.2d 565, 572 (2d Cir.1975) (failure to object to prosecutor’s remark not only constitutes waiver but “indicates counsel’s own difficulty in finding any prejudice”), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 796 , 46 L.Ed. 2d 650 (1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Thomas Tripp (2×)
6th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Stull, 521 F.2d 687, 691 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Taborda
E.D.N.Y · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Pond, 523 F.2d 210, 213 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1058 , 96 S.Ct. 794 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. John R. James, Jr. (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1977 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e. g., United States v. McCoy, 515 F.2d 962, 964 (5th Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 423 U.S. 1059 , 96 S.Ct. 795 , 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976), with United States v. Johnson, 495 F.2d 242, 244-245 (10th Cir. 1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stull
v.
United States
No. 75-5547.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1976.
423 U.S. 1059
Cited by 87 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.