green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.4 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“It is a recognized principle that a federal court is not bound by a state .. . interpretation of federal laws.... ”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"It is a recognized principle that a federal court is not bound by a state ... interpretation of federal laws...."
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Acosta
But see United States v. Bedford, 519 F.2d 650, 660 (3d Cir.1975) (Rosenn, J., dissenting), cert. denied, Bedford v. U.S., 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1120 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976).
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Thomas W. Martin, III and Eva Joe Stancil
But see United States v. Bed-ford, 519 F.2d 650 , 654 n. 1 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1120 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976). 11 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Federal Casting Division, Chromalloy American Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, Cross-Appellants
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
it is generally accepted, however, that a warrant need only be executed within a reasonable time after its issuance, notwithstanding the presence of 'forthwith' language in the complaint.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick Gallagher
if the trial judge finds that the jury had before it prejudicial material, the inquiry is complete and the conviction must be reversed.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Staten v. Housing Authority
it is a recognized principle that a federal court is not bound by a state .. . interpretation of federal laws....
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Staten v. Housing Authority Of The City Of Pittsburgh
it is a recognized principle that a federal court is not bound by a state ... interpretation of federal laws....
discussed
Cited "see"
Huffines v. State
See United States v. Bedford, 519 F.2d 650, 655-57 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1120 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976); United States v. Lemmons, 527 F.2d 662, 664 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 817 , 97 S.Ct. 60 , 50 L.Ed.2d 77 (1976); United States v. Nepstead, 424 F.2d 269, 271 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 848 , 91 S.Ct. 50 , 27 L.Ed.2d 86 (1970) (adopting reasoning that search may be executed anytime within ten days after warrant is issued, “provided that the probable cause recited in the affidavit continues until the time of execution, giving consideration to…
cited
Cited "see"
Yolanda R. CASTILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Postmaster General Anthony M. FRANK, Defendant-Appellee
See Cruz v. Hauck, 515 F.2d 322, 331 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1118 , 47 L.Ed.2d 322 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re New York Asbestos Litigation
See Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140, 151 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976); Pacific Employers Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Caldwell
Burlington Northern R.R. v. Washington Dep’t of Revenue, 934 F.2d 1064, 1069 (9th Cir.1991); see Cruz v. Hauck, 515 F.2d 322, 331 (5th Cir.1975) (if unfeasible to object prior to or at time of reference, objection should be made at earliest opportunity), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1118 , 47 L.Ed.2d 322 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lattany
See Gov’t of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140, 151 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salerno
See Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140, 153-55 (3d Cir.1975) (jury attendant’s statement that the jury should hurry up so she could get home was not prejudicial, since it did not affect juror’s vote and was not conveyed to the rest of the jury), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Murphy
See Government of V.I. v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140, 154-55 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 47 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. De Peri, Joseph. Appeal of Joseph De Peri. United States of America v. Martin, James. Appeal of James Martin. United States of America v. Linso, Dennis. Appeal of Dennis Linso. United States of America v. Morrell, George. Appeal of George Morrell. United States of America v. Pecic, Henry. Appeal of Henry Pecic. United States of America v. Murphy, Theodore. Appeal of Theodore Murphy. United States of America v. Katz, George. Appeal of George Katz
See Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140, 150-51 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976). 51 In this context, the reporter's statement neither biased the jury against the defendants nor did it provide the jury with novel information concerning the public's interest in the trial.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. De Peri
See Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140, 150-51 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Drake Towing Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Meisner Marine Construction Company v. United States of America, Cross-Appellee
See Cruz v. Hauck, 515 F.2d 322, 327 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1118 , 47 L.Ed.2d 322 (1976); United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. South Atlantic Dry Dock Co., 19 F.2d 486, 488 (5th Cir.1927); C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard v. Collins, and United States of America, Intervenor v. William Foreman, Vincent Pilleters and Terry Warden
It is true that in La Buy v. Howes Leather Co., 352 U.S. 249, 259 , 77 S.Ct. 309, 315 , 1 L.Ed.2d 290 (1957), the Supreme Court held that references to masters should take place only under “exceptional circumstances.” But in La Buy , the Court merely construed Fed.R.Civ.P. 53(b), which provides that “[a] reference to a master shall be the exception and not the rule.” The Court did not suggest that more delegation would be unconstitutional, but merely that it was not authorized by Congress and would be undesirable on policy grounds, id. at 253 n. 5, 259, 77 S.Ct. at 312 n. 5, 315; see C…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Shillcutt
See generally Government of the Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140 , 149 nn. 23-25 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gigli
See United States v. Bedford, 519 F.2d 650 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1120 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Nicholas
See Government of the Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 141 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raul Lara Martinez v. Food City, Inc., D/B/A Foodland
See Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140, 148 (3rd Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976); Cherensky v. George Washington -East Motor Lodge, 317 F.Supp. 1401, 1403 (E.D.Pa.1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Inmates, Washington County Jail v. England
See Cruz v. Hauck, C.A. 5th (1975), 515 F.2d 322, 333 [19], certiorari denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1118 , 47 L.Ed.2d 322 . (n) The plaintiffs claim that there are “ * * * no educational opportunities at all. * * * ” Defendant Thompson states that Jail inmates have access to a county mobile library.
cited
Cited "see"
Ali v. Gibson
See Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Ali v. Gibson
See Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hill
See Government of the Virgin Islands v. Gerean, 523 F.2d 140 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 42 L.Ed.2d 829 (1976), and United States v. Brumbaugh, 471 F.2d 1128 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 918 , 93 S.Ct. 2732 , 37 L.Ed.2d 144 (1973) (cases in which such comments by the bailiff were deemed nonprejudicial).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Artez
See generally, Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Beaumont Gereau, Ishmael Labeet, Warren Ballantine, Meral Smith, Raphael Joseph. Appeal of Ishmael Labeet
See Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 12 V.I. 212 , 523 F.2d 140 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 (1976); Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 11 V.I. 265 , 502 F.2d 914 (3d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 909 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Farmer v. Fisher
See Cruz v. Hauck, 515 F.2d 322, 326 (5th Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1118 , 47 L.Ed.2d 322 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Farmer v. Fisher
See Cruz v. Hauck, 515 F.2d 322, 326 (5th Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1118 , 47 L.Ed.2d 322 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. La Monte
See United States v. Bed-ford, 519 F.2d 650 -655-6 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1120 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ochs
Accord, United States v. Bedford, 519 F.2d 650 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1120 , 47 L.Ed. 323 (1976); United States v. Burke, 517 F.2d 377 (2d Cir. 1975); United States v. Scolnick, 392 F.2d 320 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Brooks v. United States, 392 U.S. 931 , 88 S.Ct. 2283 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1389 (1968); Preston v. United States, 376 U.S. 364 , 84 S.Ct. 881 , 11 L.Ed.2d 777 (1964); cf. Oregon v. Hass, 420 U.S. 714 , 95 S.Ct. 1215 , 43 L.Ed.2d 570 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pellegrini
See generally Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976); United States v. Wilson, 175 U.S. App.D.C. 173, 176-177, 534 F.2d 375, 378-79 (1976); ABA Standards Relating to Trial by Jury, § 5.7 & Commentary thereto (Approved Draft, 1968).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph S. Gambina
See Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140 (3rd Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Magnaleasing, Inc. v. Staten Island Mall
See Cruz v. Hauck, 515 F.2d 322, 331 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1118 , 47 L.Ed.2d 322 (1976). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
YOLANDA R. CASTILLO v. POSTMASTER GENERAL ANTHONY M. FRANK
See Cruz v. Hauck, 515 F.2d 322, 331 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1118 , 47 L.Ed.2d 322 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Montijo-Gonzalez
See United States v. Campanile, 516 F.2d 288 (2d Cir.1975); Moore v. United States, 461 F.2d 1236 (D.C.Cir.1972); United States v. Gomez, 42 F.R.D. 347 (S.D.N.Y.1967); United States v. Poppitt, 227 F.Supp. 73 (D.Del.1964); see also United States v. Bedford, 519 F.2d 650 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, Bedford v. United States, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1120 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976); United States v. Darensbourg, 520 F.2d 985 (5th Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
See also Cruz v. Hauck, 515 F.2d 322, 331-333 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, Andrade v. Hauck, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1118 , 47 L.Ed.2d 322 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robin Beville v. Matthew Ednie, Teton County Jail Deputy Russell Stewart, Teton County Jail Supervisor
Ruark, 928 F.2d at 948, 950 ; see also Love, 776 F.2d at 914 . (“Since plaintiff was incarcerated ... for 7 months ..., this manifestly is not a case in which ‘brevity of confinement does not permit sufficient time for prisoners to petition the courts.’” (quoting Cruz v. Hauck, 515 F.2d 322, 333 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1118 , 47 L.Ed.2d 322 (1976)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hartley
See, e.g., Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140, 149, 150-51 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Harley
See, e.g., Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140, 149, 150-51 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Messelt
See Rushen v. Spain, 464 U.S. 114, 120-21 (1983) (per curiam) (no new trial where juror knew defense witness's murder victim); United States v. Marques, 600 F.2d 742, 747 (9th Cir. 1979) (no new trial where juror saw the four defendants charged with conspiracy entering a car together), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1019 (1980); see also Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140, 148-53 (3rd Cir. 1975) (no new trial where various rumors circulated among jurors), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berrier v. Thrift
App. 45 , 415 S.E.2d 78 (1992); see also Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140, 149-50 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976); Kendall v. Whataburger, Inc., 759 S.W.2d 751 (Tex. App. 1988) (jurors incompetent to testify about a matter occurring within the jury room even though one juror, a paralegal, had influenced the voting of other jurors).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burlington Northern Railroad v. Department of Revenue of the State of Washington
See id.) Johnson Controls v. Phoenix Control Sys., 886 F.2d 1173 , 1176 (9th Cir. 1989) (appellant “waived any objections it had to the appointment of a master by failing to raise the issue, or moving to have the reference revoked”); Spaulding v. University of Washington, 740 F.2d 686, 695 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1036 , 105 S.Ct. 511 , 83 L.Ed.2d 401 (1984), overruled on other grounds, Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Co., 810 F.2d 1477 (9th Cir. 1987) (objection waived if raised for the first time on appeal); Diamond Door Co. v. Lane-Stanton Lumber Co., 505 F.2d 1199, 1206 (9th Cir…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Department Of Revenue Of The State Of Washington
See id.; Johnson Controls v. Phoenix Control Sys., 886 F.2d 1173 , 1176 (9th Cir.1989) (appellant "waived any objections it had to the appointment of a master by failing to raise the issue, or moving to have the reference revoked"); Spaulding v. University of Washington, 740 F.2d 686, 695 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1036 , 105 S.Ct. 511 , 83 L.Ed.2d 401 (1984), overruled on other grounds, Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Co., 810 F.2d 1477 (9th Cir.1987) (objection waived if raised for the first time on appeal); Diamond Door Co. v. Lane-Stanton Lumber Co., 505 F.2d 1199, 1206 (9th Cir.1974)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chandler v. U-Line Corp.
The reasons for the general rule of exclusion in Rule 606(b) are: (1) to prevent harassment of jurors by the defeated party in an effort to discover misconduct sufficient to set aside the verdict, Tanner v. United States, 483 U.S. —, 97 L.Ed. 2d 90, 105-06 , 107 S.Ct. 2739, 2747 (1987) (citing McDonald v. Pless, 238 U.S. 264, 267-68 , 59 L.Ed. 1300, 1302 , 35 S.Ct. 783, 784 (1915)); (2) the government’s interest in insulating the jury’s deliberative process, *323 id.-, (3) preventing the disruption of the finality of the process, id.-, and (4) dissuading tampering of the process by preve…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Schultz
Mueller, Jurors’ Impeachment of Verdicts and Indictments in Federal Court Under Rule 606(b), 57 Neb.L.Rev. 920, 923-24 (1978) (footnotes omitted) [hereinafter Mueller]; see also, e.g., Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140 (3d Cir.1975) (upheld trial court’s finding that jurors’ affidavits that their verdict was reached involuntarily because of external pressures were themselves the product of fear and intimidation), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1119 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976) ; United States v. Homer, 411 F.Supp. 972, 978-79 (W.D.Pa.) (if testimony allowed that juro…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maryland v. Garrison
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Bedford, 519 F. 2d 650, 655 (CA3 1975) (by name of occupant of apartment), cert. denied, 424 U. S. 917 (1976); Haynes v. State, 475 S. W. 2d 739, 741 (Tex. Crim.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Caiazzo
See, e.g., United States v. Bedford, 519 F.2d 650, 655 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 , 96 S.Ct. 1120 , 47 L.Ed.2d 323 (1976); see generally W.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neal v. John
See e.g., Government of the Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 523 F.2d 140, 153-54 (3d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 917 (1976); Port Terminal & Warehousing Co. v. John S. James Co., 92 F.R.D. 100, 105 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. De Jesus
The apartment was not kept under continual surveillance (People v Hansen, 38 NY2d 17, 20 [18 days between observation and issuance]; accord United States v Nepstead, 424 F2d 269, cert den 400 US 848 [six-day delay in execution]) and there was no information provided the reissuing Judge of continuing illegal activity (see People v Hanlon, 36 NY2d 549, 557 ; see, also, United States v Bedford, 519 F2d 650, 653, cert den 424 US 917 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Huston
v.
California and Garvas v. California
v.
California and Garvas v. California
No. 75-5609; No. 75-6029.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1976.
424 U.S. 917
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.