Slepicoff, Dba Graduate Enter. v. United States, 425 U.S. 998 (1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Slepicoff, Dba Graduate Enter. v. United States, 425 U.S. 998 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
79 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 41 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Northeast Department Ilgwu Health and Welfare Fund and Sol Hoffman v. Teamsters Local Union No. 229 Welfare Fund (ca3, 1985-05-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Northeast Department Ilgwu Health and Welfare Fund and Sol Hoffman v. Teamsters Local Union No. 229 Welfare Fund (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Local Unions of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 508 F.2d 687, 699 (3d Cir.1975) (“inasmuch as the EEOC agreement must be interpreted according to federal substantive [common] law, ... the Company’s cause of action joining EEOC ‘arises under’ laws of the United States”), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 425 U.S. 987 , 96 S.Ct. 2196 , 48 L.Ed.2d 812 cert. denied, 425 U.S. 998 , 96 S.Ct. 2215 , 48 L.Ed.2d 823 (1976).
discussed Cited "see" Harris v. Tomczak
E.D. Cal. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See and compare Virgil v. Time, Inc., 527 F.2d 1122 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 998 , 96 S.Ct. 2215 , 48 L.Ed.2d 823 (1976) with United Medical Laboratories, Inc., v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 404 F.2d 706, 711-12 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 921 , 89 S.Ct. 1197 , 22 L.Ed.2d 454 (1969). .
discussed Cited "see" 25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 774, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,636 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ford Motor Company, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ford Motor Company
4th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Meadows v. Ford Motor Co., 510 F.2d 939, 949 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 998 , 96 S.Ct. 2215 , 48 L.Ed.2d 823 (1976), ("... where the burden of retroactive pay falls upon the party which violated the law, the burden of retroactive seniority for the determination of layoff would fall directly upon other workers who themselves had no hand in the wrongdoing found by the District Court."); Local 189, United Papermakers & Paperworkers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980, 985 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970). 145 The Supreme Court has held…
discussed Cited "see" Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ford Motor Co.
4th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Meadows v. Ford Motor Co., 510 F.2d 939, 949 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 998 , 96 S.Ct. 2215 , 48 L.Ed.2d 823 (1976), (“.. . where the burden of retroactive pay falls upon the party which violated the law, the burden of retroactive seniority for the determination of layoff would fall directly upon other workers who themselves had no hand in the wrongdoing found by the District Court.”); Local 189, United Papermakers & Paperworkers v. United States, 416 F.2d 980, 985 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919 , 90 S.Ct. 926 , 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970).
discussed Cited "see" Howard v. Des Moines Register & Tribune Co. (2×)
Iowa · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Virgil v. Time, Inc., 527 F.2d 1122, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 998 , 96 S.Ct. 2215 , 48 L.Ed.2d 823 (1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." GSC Construction, Inc.
A.S.B.C.A. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Groves & Sons, 315 F.2d at 237-38 ; Chenette v. Trustees ofIowa College, 431 F.2d 49, 53 (8th Cir. 1970); United States v. Lange, 466 F.2d 1021, 1026 (9th Cir. 1972); see also Virgil v. Time, Inc., 527 F.2d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 998 (1976) (noting the importance of the exercise of judicial discretion in denying summary judgment motion pending development of complete record); Lind v. UPS, Inc., 254 F .3d 1281, 1284 (11th Cir. 2001).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Hall v. Rose Post
N.C. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Virgil v. Time, Inc., 527 F. 2d 1122 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 998 , 48 L.Ed. 2d 823 (1976); McCabe v. Village Voice, Inc., 550 F. Supp. 525 (E.D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers
D. Ariz. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Meadows v. Ford Motor Company, 62 F.R.D. 98, 102 (W.D.Ky.1973), judgment modified on other grounds 510 F.2d 939 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied 425 U.S. 998 , 96 S.Ct. 2215 , 48 L.Ed.2d 823 (1976).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Capra v. Thoroughbred Racing Ass'n of North America, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Virgil v. Time, Inc., 527 F.2d 1122, 1125-26 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 998 , 96 S.Ct. 2215 , 48 L.Ed.2d 823 (1976).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Anthony Capra v. Thoroughbred Racing Association Of North America, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Virgil v. Time, Inc., 527 F.2d 1122, 1125-26 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 998 , 96 S.Ct. 2215 , 48 L.Ed.2d 823 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hyman C. Slepicoff, Dba Graduate Enterprises
v.
United States
75-1226.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 24, 1976.
425 U.S. 998
Brennan, Stewart, Marshall.
Published
Reporter's Syllabus — editorial summary, not part of the Court's opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice BRENNAN, with whom Mr. Justice STEWART and Mr. Justice MARSHALL join, dissenting.

Lead Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Dissent

Mr. Justice Brennan, with whom Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall join,

dissenting.

Petitioner was convicted after jury trial in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida of mailing obscene advertisements in violation of 18 U. S. C. § 1461. That section provides in pertinent part:

“Every obscene, lewd, lascivious, indecent, filthy or vile article, matter, thing, device, or substance; ...
“Is declared to be nonmailable matter and shall not be conveyed in the mails or delivered from any post office or by any letter carrier.
[*999] “Whoever knowingly uses the mails for the mailing ... of anything declared by this section ... to be nonmailable . . . shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years . . . .”

The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed. 524 F. 2d 1244.

I adhere to my dissent in United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139, 147 (1973), in which, speaking of 18 U. S. C. § 1462, which is similar in scope to § 1461, I expressed the view that “[w]hatever the extent of the Federal Government’s power to bar the distribution of allegedly obscene material to juveniles or the offensive exposure of such material to unconsenting adults, the statute before us is clearly overbroad and unconstitutional on its face.” 413 U. S., at 147-148. For the reasons stated in my dissent in Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 47 (1973), I would therefore grant certiorari, and, since the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was rendered after Orito, reverse.

In these circumstances, I have no occasion to consider whether the other questions presented by petitioner merit plenary review. See Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483, 494 (1973) (Brennan, J., dissenting).