green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1980 ·
…the court may not require production of records not in custody or control of an agency
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
(2×)
the court may not require production of records not in custody or control of an agency
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carter
See United States v. Trowery, 542 F.2d 623, 627 (3d Cir.1976) (“Smee the quantum and nature of evidence required for the application of the co-conspirator exception differs from that required for the crime of conspiracy .... [i]t *347 follows, therefore, that the absence of a conspiracy count has no bearing on the court’s determination of the competence of co-conspirator evidence.”), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1132 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Cal-Almond, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture
See Nolen v. Rumsfeld, 535 F.2d 890, 891 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977) (FOIA does not compel production of missing records).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wynn v. Eriksson
The withdrawal of an attorney in a given case is a "matter entrusted to the sound discretion of the court and will be overturned on appeal only for an abuse of that discretion." Streetman, 674 F.Supp. at 234 ; accord United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214 (5th Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977); Broughten v. Voss, 634 F.2d 880 (5th Cir.1981). 16 The bankruptcy court granted Attorney Simon's request to withdraw after hearing Wynn's response to the motion in open court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wynn v. Eriksson (In re Wynn)
The withdrawal of an attorney in a given case is a “matter entrusted to the sound discretion of the court and will be overturned on appeal only for an abuse of that discretion.” Streetman, 674 F.Supp. at 234 ; accord United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214 (5th Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977); Broughten v. Voss, 634 F.2d 880 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kirkland v. National Mortgage Network, Inc.
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1219 (5th Cir.1976) ten banc ), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977) (affirming order disqualifying attorney for misconduct during trial, noting that “courts enjoy broad discretion to determine who shall practice before them and to monitor the conduct of those who do”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kirkland v. National Mortgage Network, Inc.
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1219 (5th Cir.1976) (en banc ), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977) (affirming order disqualifying attorney for misconduct during trial, noting that "courts enjoy broad discretion to determine who shall practice before them and to monitor the conduct of those who do").
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Pemberthy
See United States v. Auler, 539 F. 2d 642, 646 (7th Cir.1976), cert. den. 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1132 , 51 L.Ed. 2d 555 (1977); United States v. Harvey, 540 F. 2d 1345, 1351 (8th Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. De Peri, Joseph. Appeal of Joseph De Peri. United States of America v. Martin, James. Appeal of James Martin. United States of America v. Linso, Dennis. Appeal of Dennis Linso. United States of America v. Morrell, George. Appeal of George Morrell. United States of America v. Pecic, Henry. Appeal of Henry Pecic. United States of America v. Murphy, Theodore. Appeal of Theodore Murphy. United States of America v. Katz, George. Appeal of George Katz
See United States v. Trowery, 542 F.2d 623, 627 (3d Cir.1976) (per curiam), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1132 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. De Peri
See United States v. Trowery, 542 F.2d 623, 627 (3d Cir.1976) (per curiam), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1132 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Jackie Kleiner v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Hansell & Post, Richard Kirby and Richard M. Langway, George W. Morosani v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Hansell & Post, Richard Kirby and Richard M. Langway
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214 , 1219 & n. 6 (5th Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Kleiner v. First National Bank
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214 , 1219 & n. 6 (5th Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
The Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California v. John M. Ross
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1219 (5th Cir.1976), *1173 cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bundy v. State
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977); Ross v. Reda, 510 F.2d 1172 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 190 , 46 L.Ed.2d 124 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
General Brewing Company v. Law Firms Of Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & O'hearn
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1222 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
General Brewing Co. v. Law Firms of Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & O'hearn
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1222 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Lee Wilson, Norman Karl Scott v. United States
See United States v. Darnell, 545 F.2d 595, 599 (8th Cir. 1976) (disregarding “countless” hypothetical consequences), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1134 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Francis B. Kendall
United States v. Gil, 604 F.2d 546, 549-50 (7th Cir. 1979); accord, United States v. Trowery, 542 F.2d 623, 626 (3d Cir. 1976) (per curiam), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1132 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John L. Warren, Jr., David Defina, Des E. Schick and Thomas A. Warren
(2×)
See United States v. Darnell, 545 F.2d 595, 598 (8th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1134 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977). 31 They advance three additional adverse collateral consequences which could flow from a conviction: 32 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Continental Group, Inc., in No. 78-2328. United States v. Chase Bag Company, in No. 78-2330. United States v. Cooper, James K., in No. 78-2331. United States v. Rue, Harrison B., in No. 78-2332
See United States v. Trowery, 542 F.2d 623 (3d Cir. 1976) (per curiam), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1132 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977); United States v. Bey, supra. 72 Appellants' position is that the trial judge in this case abdicated his responsibility under Trowery and Bey and allowed the jury to make the determination as to whether the government had established sufficient independent evidence of the conspiracy.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Continental Group, Inc.
See United States v. Trowery, 542 F.2d 623 (3d Cir. 1976) (per curiam), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1132 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977); United States v. Bey, supra. Appellants’ position is that the trial judge in this case abdicated his responsibility under Trowery and Bey and allowed the jury to make the determination as to whether the government had established sufficient independent evidence of the conspiracy.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ruel Frank Brown, Jr.
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1219 (5th Cir. 1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dwyer
(2×)
See United States v. Auler, 539 F.2d 642 (7th Cir. 1976), [cert. denied 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1132 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 ]; United States v. Goldstein, 532 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir. 1976), [cert. denied 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 ]; United States v. Clegg, 509 F.2d 605 (5th Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Don Raymond Poteet
See United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Weisberg v. United States Dept. of Justice
See Nolen v. Rumsfeld, 535 F.2d 890, 891 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Civil Liberties Union v. Blaine School District No. 503
See also SHB 827 Bill Analysis, at 9 (Mar. 24, 1975). 14 RCW 42.17.290. 15 535 F.2d 890, 892 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 (1977). 16 131 Wn.2d at 35 . 17 131 Wn.2d at 35 n.8 (citing 5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(4)(E)). 18 127 Wn.2d 820 , 904 P.2d 1124 (1995). 19 127 Wn.2d at 835 . 20 5 U.S.C. § 552 (a)(4)(A) (section discussing fees for which agencies may recover does not mention mailing fees). 21 166 Wis. 2d 159 , 479 N.W.2d 576 (1991), review denied, 482 N.W.2d 105 (1992). 22 Larsen, 479 N.W.2d at 578 . 23 State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kitchen v. Aristech Chemical
Other circuits have approved dismissal of an attorney for pursuing frivolous theories, e.g., United States v. Masat, 896 F.2d 88, 92 (5th Cir.1990); for violation of the rules of professional conduct which resulted in an “erosion of public confidence in the integrity of the bar and of the legal system,” United States v. Hobson, 672 F.2d 825, 829 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982); or for misconduct in open court that substantially impeded the orderly administration of justice, e.g., United States v. Collins, 920 F.2d 619, 627 (10th Cir.1990); se…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the Army
An agency is not required by the FOIA to mail copies of records, “nor even to provide a requester-convenient location for access.” Tax Analysts, 845 F.2d at 1067 ; see also Nolen v. Rumsfeld, 535 F.2d 890, 892 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977) (agency not required to mail copies of requested records or pay travel expenses to obtain the requested records).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gambino
See also United States v. Trowery, 542 F.2d 623, 626-27 (3d Cir.1976) (per curiam), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1132 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edwin L. Cabra and Claude \Buddy\" Leach"
See also United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1223-24 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas Andretta
See, e. g., United States v. Trowery, 542 F.2d 623, 626-27 (3d Cir. 1976) (per curiam), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1132 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Edward Gaston
See also United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1224-25 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1133 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977) (no error in the trial court’s refusal to conduct an in camera inspection of records of an FBI investigation of a matter collateral to defendant’s case where there was no indication that the rec *613 ords contained material information since the defendant’s Brady theory was highly speculative and was rebutted by two FBI agents).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bernard Cornfeld, Dba Grayhall, Inc.
The same issues were presented in United States v. Goldstein, 532 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 960 , 97 S.Ct. 384 , 50 L.Ed.2d 327 (1977); see also United *970 States v. Auler, 539 F.2d 642 (7th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1132 , 51 L.Ed.2d 555 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John D. Frazier
See also United States v. Darnell, 545 F.2d 595, 597 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1104 , 97 S.Ct. 1134 , 51 L.Ed.2d 556 (1977); United States v. Heng A wkak Roman, 356 F.Supp. 434, 438 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 484 F.2d 1271 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 978 , 94 S.Ct. 1565 , 39 L.Ed.2d 874 (1974); United States v. Hair, 356 F.Supp. 339, 341-42 (D.C.1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Darnell
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-5804.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court (2)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.