green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
8.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
United States v. Oliver L. North
(4×)
See Nixon v. Administrator, 433 U.S. at 447-48 , 97 S.Ct. at 2792-93 ; Dellums v. Powell, 642 F.2d 1351 (D.C.Cir.1980); Dellums v. Powell, 561 F.2d 242, 246 (D.C.Cir.1977); see also Nixon v. Sirica, 487 F.2d 700, 713, 716-17 (D.C.Cir.1973) (Presidential communications held presumptively privileged in case prior to United States v. Nixon where President interposed formal claim of privilege in response to grand jury subpoena); but cf. United States v. Ehrlichman, 546 F.2d 910, 931 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 570 (1977) (presumptive executive privilege…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eliseo Medina-Elenes
See United States v. Hart, 546 F.2d 798, 799 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1120 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Dale Reese, United States of America v. Scott Matthew Dwyer, United States of America v. Daniel Wayne Broussard, United States of America v. Larry Marcel Houston
(2×)
See Screws, 325 U.S. at 106 , 65 S.Ct. at 1037 ("he who alters ballots or without legal justification destroys them would be acting willfully" to deprive people of their right to vote under Article I of the Constitution). 55 In all of these cases, the Court indicates that if a constitutional right is clearly delineated and the defendant acted "with the particular purpose of depriving the citizen victim of his enjoyment of the interests" that right protects, "he will be adjudged as a matter of law to have acted 'willfully'--i.e., 'in reckless disregard of constitutional prohibitions or guarante…
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramon C. Garza and Alfredo R. Menchaca
(4×)
See United States v. Ehrlichman, 546 F.2d 910, 921 (D.C.Cir.1976), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 570 (1977); cf. United States v. McClean, 528 F.2d 1250, 1255 (2nd Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter M. Kendall, United States of America v. Gerald A. Akers
(2×)
See United States v. Hart, 546 F.2d 798, 801-02 (9th Cir. 1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 571 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gunnison
(2×)
Accord, United States v. Ehrlichman, 546 F.2d 910 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. den. 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 570 (1977); Commonwealth v. Benesch, 290 Mass. 125 , 194 N.E. 905 (1935); People v. Harris, 294 N.Y. 424 , 63 N.E.2d 17 (1945); People v. Powell, 63 N.Y. 88 (1875).
examined
Cited "see"
Matter of Colson
(4×)
See United States v. Ehrlichman, 178 U.S.App.D.C. 144 , 546 F.2d 910 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 570 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
25 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) 83,002, 3 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1342 United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of A. v. Deblasio Construction, Inc. v. Mountain States Construction Co., and Mountain States Construction Co., Third Party v. United Pacific Insurance Co., Third Party v. A. v. Deblasio and Jean Deblasio, His Wife, and the Martial Community Composedof Them, Third Party United States of America, Etc. v. Mountain States Construction Company, and Mountain States Construction Co., Third Party v. United Pacific Insurance Co., Third Party v. A. v. Deblasio and Jean Deblasio, Etc., Third Party
(2×)
See United States v. Hart, 546 F.2d 798, 802 (9th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 571 (1977); United States v. Ironworkers Local 86, 443 F.2d 544, 548-49 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 404 U.S. 984 , 92 S.Ct. 447 , 30 L.Ed.2d 367 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mountain States Construction Co.
(2×)
See United States v. Hart, 546 F.2d 798, 802 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 571 (1977); United States v. Ironworkers Local 86, 443 F.2d 544, 548-49 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 984 , 92 S.Ct. 447 , 30 L.Ed.2d 367 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Providence Journal Co. v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
(2×)
See United States v. Ehrlichman, 178 U.S. App.D.C. 144, 149 n.6, 546 F.2d 910 , 915 n.6 (1976) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 570 (1977) (testimony that “part of the purpose in examining [Ellsberg’s psychiatrist’s] files was to obtain information that could be made public through Congressional investigations, hearings or by release to the newspapers” so that those in the White House could “bring about a change in Ells-berg’s image.”); see also United States v. Liddy, 177 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 3-4, 542 F.2d 76, 78-79 (1976); United States v. Haldeman, 181 U.S. …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johann Ernst Thurnhuber
(2×)
See United States v. Hart, 546 F.2d 798, 801-02 (9th Cir. 1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 571 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Halperin v. Kissinger
See generally United States v. Ehrlichman, 546 F.2d 910 (D.C.Cir. 1976) cert. denied-U.S. -, 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d - (1977); Berlin Democratic Club v. Rumsfeld, 410 F. Supp. 144, 157-59 (D.D.C.1976). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Hardy
(2×)
Thus, “[antagonistic defenses do not per se require severance, even if the defendants are hostile or attempt to cast the blame on each other.” (United States v. Becker (4th Cir. 1978) 585 F.2d 703, 707 , cert. den. 439 U.S. 1080 [ 59 L.Ed.2d 50 , 99 S.Ct. 862 ].) “Rather, to obtain severance on the ground of conflicting defenses, it must be demonstrated that the conflict is so prejudicial that [the] defenses are irreconcilable, and the jury will unjustifiably infer that this conflict alone demonstrates that both are guilty.” (United States v. Davis (1st Cir. 1980) 623 F.2d 188, 194-195…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Biegenwald
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Ehrlichman, 546 F.2d 910 , 916-17 n. 8 (D.C.Cir.1976) [cert. den., 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 570 (1977)]; United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31, 61-63 (D.C.Cir.1976) [cert. den. sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hastings J. Dise
(2×)
See also United States v. Ehrlichman, 546 F.2d 910, 921 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 570 (1977); United States v. Senate, 527 F.2d 129, 149 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 907 , 96 S.Ct. 1500 , 47 L.Ed.2d 758 (1976); United States v. Stokes, 506 F.2d 771, 776-77 (5th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Wandel
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Hart, 546 F.2d 798 (9th Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 571 (1977); United States v. Hayes, 477 F.2d 868 (10th Cir.1973); United States v. Tatum, 496 F.2d 1282 (5th Cir.1974); United States v. Williams, 496 F.2d 378 (1st Cir. 1974).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leonard Ray Blanton (81-5644), Clyde Edward Hood, Jr. (81-5645), James M. Allen (81-5643)
(4×)
See also United States v. Ehrlichman, 546 F.2d 910 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 570 (1977) (burglary of psychiatrist's files regarding Daniel Ells-berg, who released the “Pentagon Papers”); People v. Manson, 61 Cal.App.3d 102 , 132 Cal.Rptr. 265 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 1686 , 52 L.Ed.2d 382 (1977) (“Manson family” Tate and LaBianca murder trial); People v. Collins, 43 Mich.App. 259 , 204 N.W.2d 290 (1973), lv. to appeal denied, 391 Mich. 798 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 866 , 95 S.Ct. 121 , 42 L.Ed.2d 103 (1974) (John Norman Col…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roberto Gonzalez
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Hart, 546 F.2d 798, 799 , 802-803 & n.8 (9th Cir. 1976) (en banc) (citing cases), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 571 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frederick Lyle McIntyre United States of America v. Dale Irwin Vanbuskirk
(2×)
Compare, United States v. Lizarraga-Lizarraga, 541 F.2d 826 (9th Cir. 1976) with United States v. Ehrlichman, 178 U.S.App.D.C. 144 , 546 F.2d 910 (1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed.2d 570 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Branam
(2×)
See also, United States v. Hart, 546 F. 2d 798 (9 Cir.1976), cert. den. 429 U.S. 1120 , 97 S.Ct. 1155 , 51 L.Ed. 2d 571 (1977); People v. Johnston, 47 A.D. 2d 897 , 366 N.Y.S. 2d 198 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ehrlichman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-383.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1977.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 96 opinions | Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.