green
Positive treatment
7.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Davenport v. State
(2×)
But cf. Rice v. Wolff, 513 F.2d 1280 , (8th Cir.1975), rev'd on other grounds sub nom., Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465 , 96 S.Ct. 3037 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1067 , reh. denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 197 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 , (1976) (no probable cause where only reason to believe suspect in home of third person was that both were in same black political association). [30] In addition to his felony convictions, Davenport was incarcerated twice as a juvenile and has numerous misdemeanor offenses including speeding, reckless driving, indecent language, failure to appear and resisting arrest. [31] See State v…
discussed
Cited "see"
Carter Engineering Co. v. Carter (In Re Carter)
See In re Lawrence, 227 B.R. at 916 (citing National Hockey League, et al. v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc., et al., 427 U.S. 639, 642-43 , 96 S.Ct. 2778 , 49 L.Ed.2d 747 , reh. denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 197 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sidney A. Erickson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 442 , 96 S.Ct. 3021, 3026 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 (“Certainly, proof that an assessment is utterly without foundation is proof that it is arbitrary and erroneous.”), reh’g denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 196 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976); Gerardo v. Commissioner, 552 F.2d 549, 554 (3d Cir.1977) (“[I]n order to give effect to the presumption on which the Commissioner relies, some evidence must appear which would support an inference of the taxpayer’s involvement in [illegal] activity during the period covered by the assessment.
discussed
Cited "see"
WH Shipman, Ltd. v. Hawaiian Holiday
Accord National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc., 427 U.S. 639 , 96 S.Ct. 2778 , 49 L.Ed.2d 747 (per curiam), reh'g denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 197 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976) (the majority held that there was no abuse of discretion because the district court found bad faith on the part of the delinquent parties); Batson v. Neal Spelce Assocs., Inc., 805 F.2d 546 (5th Cir.1986) (the district court made extensive findings that the plaintiff had acted in bad faith); Carter v. Albert Einstein Medical Center, 804 F.2d 805, 807 (3d Cir.1986) (quoting Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Casua…
discussed
Cited "see"
Scutieri v. Estate of Revitz
See Hohensee v. Grier, 373 F.Supp. 1358, 1363-64 (M.D.Penn.1974) aff'd. without opinion, 524 F.2d 1405 (1975) cert. denied, 426 U.S. 940 , 96 S.Ct. 2659 , 49 L.Ed.2d 392 (1976) reh’g denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 196 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976); Taylor v. First Wyoming Bank, 707 F.2d 388 , 390, n. 3 (9th Cir.1983); City Partners Ltd., BMG v. Jamaica Savings Bank, 454 F.Supp. 1269, 1275 (E.D.N.Y.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Varn v. United States
See United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 446-47 , 96 S.Ct. 3021, 3028-29 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 , reh’g denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 196 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976); INS v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032 , 104 S.Ct. 3479 , 82 L.Ed.2d 778 (1984); Garrett v. Lehman, 751 F.2d 997 (9th Cir. 1985). 7 Plaintiff argues that he had ineffective counsel when he agreed to Article 15 nonjudicial punishment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. State
“Appellate courts review enumerations for correction of errors of law committed by the trial court — where motions or objections are properly presented for a ruling by the trial court. [Cit.] Enumerated errors which raise issues for the first time in a motion for new trial or on appeal present nothing for review. [Cit.]” Fowler v. State, 155 Ga. App. 76 (2) ( 270 SE2d 297 ) (1980); see Pulliam v. State, 236 Ga. 460, 465 ( 224 SE2d 8 ) (1976) cert. denied, 428 U. S. 911 , reh. denied, 429 U. S. 874 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mosko
See, United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 907-908 , 104 S.Ct. 3405, 3412 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984), Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 493-495 , 96 S.Ct. 3037, 3051, 3052 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1067 , reh’g denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 197 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dakota Bank & Trust Co. of Fargo v. Brakke
(2×)
See National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, 427 U.S. 639 , 96 S.Ct. 2778 , 49 L.Ed.2d 747 , reh'g denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 197 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Elliott v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.
Accord, United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433 , 96 S.Ct. 3021 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 , on remand, 540 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir.), reh. denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 196 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. Ziebarth
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See, National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, 427 U.S. 639 , 96 S.Ct. 2778 , 49 L.Ed.2d 747 , reh’g denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 197 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976); Edgar v. Slaughter, 548 F.2d 770 (8th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Smith
See In re Professional Hockey Antitrust Litigation (C.A. 3, 1976), 531 F. 2d 1188, 1193 , reversed on other grounds in National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. (1976), 427 U.S. 639 , rehearing denied (1976), 429 U.S. 874 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lima
(2×)
See United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 446 , 96 S.Ct. 3021, 3028 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 , reh. denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 196 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Watlington
(2×)
See Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465 , 96 S.Ct. 3037 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1976), reh. denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 197 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paul v. Paul
(2×)
See, National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc., 427 U.S. 639 , 96 S.Ct. 2778 , 49 L.Ed.2d 747 (1976), rehearing denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 197 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976), for a discussion of the trial court’s discretion under Rule 37, F.R.C.P.
discussed
Cited "see"
Furcello v. Klammer
See In re Professional Hockey Antitrust Litigation (C.A. 3, 1976), 531 F. 2d 1188, 1193 , reversed on other grounds in National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. (1976), 427 U. S. 639 , rehearing denied (1976), 429 U. S. 874 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Confederation of Police v. City of Chicago
See Vorbeck v. McNeal, 407 F.Supp. 733, 739 (E.D.Mo.1976), aff’d, 426 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 3160 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1180 , reh. denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 194 , 50 L.Ed.2d 156 (upholding the exclusion of police officers from certain collective bargaining procedures); see generally, State ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Zaccardi v. Becker
See National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc., 427 U.S. 639 , 76 S.Ct. 277 , 49 L.Ed. 2d 747 (1976), reh. den. 429 U.S. 874 (1976); Annotation, "Dismissal of state court action for failure or refusal of plaintiff to answer written interrogatories," 56 A.L.R. 3d 1109 , 1114 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carpenter v. State
(2×)
See Stone v. Powell (1976), 428 U.S. 465 , 96 S.Ct. 3037 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1067 , reh. den. 429 U.S. 874 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sims v. Collection Division of the Utah State Tax Commission
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 446 , 96 S.Ct. 3021, 3028 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 , reh'g denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 196 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976); United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 347 , 94 S.Ct. 613, 619 , 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974); Caffie, 516 So.2d at 832 ; Pullin, 484 So.2d at 107 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ford v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Founding Church, 802 F.2d at 1458 ; see also National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, 427 U.S. 639, 643 , 96 S.Ct. 2778, 2781 , 49 L.Ed.2d 747 (“[Hjere, as in other areas of the law, the most severe in the spectrum of sanctions provided by statute or rule must be available to the district court in appropriate cases, not merely to penalize those whose conduct may be deemed to warrant such a sanction, but to deter those who might be tempted to such conduct in the absence of such a deterrent.”), reh’g denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 197 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Harvey v. United States
Ga.1981); see also United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 454, 459-460 , 96 S.Ct. 3021, 3034-35 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1976), reh’g denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 196 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976). 9.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Melvin E. Adams, Roadway Express, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenor v. J.W. Jones Construction Company
See, e.g., National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc., 427 U.S. 639 , 96 S.Ct. 2778 , 49 L.Ed.2d 727 (per curiam), reh. denied, 429 U.S. 874 , 97 S.Ct. 197 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976); Robison v. Transamerica Ins., 368 F.2d 37 (10th Cir. 1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Janis National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.
v.
Janis National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.
No. 74-958; No. 75-1558.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1976.
Consideration, Petitions, Took.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
428 U. S. 433; and
427 U. S. 639. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.