green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Franchise Realty”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Transphase Systems, Inc. v. Southern California Edison Co.
joint efforts to influence public officials do not violate the antitrust laws even though intended to eliminate competition.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Premier Electrical Construction Co. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
the danger that the mere pendency of the action will chill the exercise of first amendment rights requires more specific allegations than would otherwise be required
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Oahu Gas Service, Inc. v. Pacific Resources, Inc.
franchise realty
discussed
Cited "see"
Raymond Jackson v. Kantola, C/o Ruo Isaacson James Ruotsala
See Peabody Coal Co. v. Local Union Nos. 1734, 1508 and 1548, UMW, 484 F.2d 78, 81 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied after subsequent appeal, 430 U.S. 940 (1977). 6 We also note that although the district court did not address all allegations in Jackson's ninth claim, the omission does not warrant vacating the district court's judgment and remanding for further consideration because relief was implicitly denied.
discussed
Cited "see"
William Isom Moses v. Charles Green, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Bell Circuit Court Clerk
See Peabody Coal Co. v. Local Union Nos. 1734, 1508 and 1548, UMW, 484 F.2d 78, 81 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied after subsequent appeal, 430 U.S. 940 (1977). 5 Upon de novo review, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment to the defendant as there is no genuine issue of material fact and the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rabkin v. Dean
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Bd. of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977); Lockary v. Kayfetz, 587 F.Supp. 631 (N.D.Cal.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Employers Insurance Company v. Metro Regional Transit Authority
(2×)
See Peabody Coal Co. v. Local Union Nos. 1734, 1508, and 1548, UMW, 484 F.2d 78, 81-82 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied after subsequent appeal, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977) (treating timely appeal from denial of a Rule 59(e) motion as appeal from underlying judgment as well).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mccalden v. California Library Association
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1082-83 (9th Cir.1976) (holding that "in any case ... where a plaintiff seeks damages or injunctive relief, or both, for conduct which is prima facie protected by the First Amendment, the danger that the mere pendency of the action will chill the exercise of First Amendment rights requires more specific allegations than would otherwise be required"), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977); accord, Hydro-Tech Corp. v. Sundstrand Corp., 673 F.2d 1171 …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. District Council
See Franchise Realty Interstate Group v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1082 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
McCalden v. California Library Ass'n
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1082-83 (9th Cir.1976) (holding that “in any case ... where a plaintiff seeks damages or injunctive relief, or both, for conduct which is prima facie protected by the First Amendment, the danger that the mere pendency of the action will chill the exercise of First Amendment rights requires more specific allegations than would otherwise be required”), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977); accord, Hydro-Tech Corp. v. Sundstrand Corp., 673 F.2d 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1082 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of City of San Jose
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1080-81 (9th Cir.1976) (Franchise Realty ), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boone v. Redevelopment Agency
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1080-81 (9th Cir.1976) (Fr anchise Realty), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp.
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1085 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corporation
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1085 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977). 32 AFFIRMED.
cited
Cited "see"
Randall v. Lukhard
Accord, Lewis v. Shulimson, 400 F.Supp. 807, 810 (E.D.Mo.1975), aff’d, 534 F.2d 794 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1570 , 51 L.Ed.2d 786 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Association of Data Processing Services Organizations, Inc. v. Citibank, N.A.
See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board, 542 F.2d 1076, 1082-83 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a Corporation
(2×)
See generally Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076 , 1081 n.4, 1087 (9th Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977). 16 28 Rather, this case involves simply the commencement and maintenance of related infringement actions in what the jury found to be bad faith. 29 A clash between the policies of patent and antitrust laws also was present in Walker Process and Kobe.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bulkferts Inc. v. Salatin Inc.
California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508, 513 , 92 S.Ct. 609, 613 , 30 L.Ed.2d 642 (1972); Reaemco, supra, 496 F.Supp. at 556 ; First American Title Co. v. South Dakota Land Title Association, 541 F.Supp. 1147, 1158-59 (D.S.D.1982); see also, Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, 542 F.2d 1076, 1081 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Borough of Lansdale v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
Compare Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board, 542 F.2d 1076 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977), noted in 30 Vand.L.Rev. 75 (1977) (holding that repeated, baseless opposition before an adjudicative body does not result in loss of Noerr-Pennington immunity absent conduct external to or abusive of the adjudicatory process) with Associated Radio Service Company v. Page Airways, Inc., 414 F.Supp. 1088, 1096 (N.D.Tex.1976) (plaintiff need only be able to show that the defendant initiated proceedings for the sp…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Levitch v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
See, e. g., Franchise Realty v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board, 542 F.2d 1076, 1082-83 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977); Bethlehem Plaza v. Campbell, 403 F.Supp. 966 (E.D.Pa.1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gourley, Director, Division of Family Services of Missouri
v.
Lewis
v.
Lewis
No. 76-188.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1977.
Certiorari.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.