green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“all discharges of pollutants must be authorized by a permit . . .”
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Petrucelli v. Smith
But cf. Jackson v. Justices of Superior Court, 549 F.2d 215, 217 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 975 , 97 S.Ct. 1666 , 52 L.Ed.2d 370 (1977) (retroactive application of Breed v. Jones, 421 U.S. 519 , 95 S.Ct. 1779 , 44 L.Ed.2d 346 (1975) must be analyzed according to traditional balancing factors).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Bullard v. Estelle
But see Jackson v. Justices of Superior Court, 549 F.2d 215 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 975 , 97 S.Ct. 1666 , 52 L.Ed.2d 370 (1977) (contra; rejecting Robinson approach in favor of standard analysis).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Frezzo Brothers, Inc.
all discharges of pollutants must be authorized by a permit . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dobbs v. Turpin
(2×)
See Dobbs v. State, 236 Ga. 427 , 224 S.E.2d 3, 4-5 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 975 , 97 S.Ct. 1667 , 52 L.Ed.2d 370 (1977). 1 In December 1980, Dobbs filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dobbs v. Turpin
(2×)
See Dobbs v. State, 236 Ga. 427 , 224 S.E.2d 3, 4-5 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 975 , 97 S.Ct. 1667 , 52 L.Ed.2d 370 (1977).1 In December 1980, Dobbs filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
cited
Cited "see"
Wilburn Dobbs v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
See Dobbs v. State, 236 Ga. 427 , 224 S.E.2d 3 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 975 , 97 S.Ct. 1667 , 52 L.Ed.2d 370 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garland Claude Cochran
See United States v. Crawford, 769 F.2d 253, 258 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1103 , 106 S.Ct. 887 , 88 L.Ed.2d 922 (1986) (“Correction of a sentence imposed in an illegal manner does not violate double jeopardy even if the correction increases the punishment, and the fact that [the defendant] has commenced serving the sentence is irrelevant.”) (brackets in original) (quoting United States v. Stevens, 548 F.2d 1360, 1362-63 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 975 , 97 S.Ct. 1666 , 52 L.Ed.2d 369 (1977)).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Association of Metal Finishers, Electroplaters of York, Inc. And Pioneer Metal Finishing, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, the Institute for Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits v. Environmental Protection Agency, Ford Motor Company, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Intervenor. National Association of Metal Finishers and Institute for Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits v. Environmental Protection Agency, General Motors Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Walter Barber, Acting Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Intervenor. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chemical Manufacturers Association, American Cyanamid Company, Fmc Corporation, Union Carbide Corporation, Intervenors. United States Brewers Association v. Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, and Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Intervenor. Manufacturing Chemists Association, American Paper Institute, National Forest Products Association, National Paint and Coatings Association, Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturers Association, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., American Cyanamid Company, Fmc Corporation, Hercules Incorporated, Shell Oil Company, and Union Carbide Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Intervenor. Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Intervenor. National Association of Metal Finishers v. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Intervenor. Chemical Manufacturers Association, American Cyanamid Company, Fmc Corporation, Union Carbide Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Intervenor. American Paper Institute and National Forest Products Association v. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Intervenor. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chemical Manufacturers Association, American Cyanamid Company, Fmc Corporation, Union Carbide Corporation, Intervenors. Metal Finishing Association of Southern California v. Environmental Protection Agency, Interlake, Inc., Republic Steel Corporation and United States Steel Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Intervenor, American Iron & Steel Institute, Rouge Steel Co., Intervenors. Chicago Association of Commerce and Industry, Illinois Manufacturers' Association, and Mid-American Legal Foundation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Intervenor
See Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Train, 544 F.2d 657, 660 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 975 , 97 S.Ct. 1666 , 52 L.Ed.2d 369 (1977) 13 Relying primarily on those statements in the legislative history, USBA argues that the definition of interference must include a requirement that the POTW be well-designed and well-maintained.
cited
Cited "see"
National Ass'n of Metal Finishers v. Environmental Protection Agency
See Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Train, 544 F.2d 657, 660 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 975 , 97 S.Ct. 1666 , 52 L.Ed.2d 369 (1977). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter A. Niemiec
See United States v. Stevens, 548 F.2d 1360 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 975 , 97 S.Ct. 1666 , 52 L.Ed.2d 369 (1977); and Aga v. United States, 312 F.2d 637 (8th Cir. 1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Godfrey v. Georgia
(2×)
See Banks v. State, 237 Ga. 325 , 227 S. E. 2d 380 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U. S. 975 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic Steel Corporation v. Costle
See Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Train, 544 F.2d 657, 659-60 (3d Cir. 1976), Cert. den., 430 U.S. 975 , 97 S.Ct. 1666 , 52 L.Ed.2d 369 (1977) 9 The Senate Report indicates that § 309(a)(5)(B) was directed, in part, at dischargers whose noncompliance was caused by their inability to ascertain applicable standards, despite good faith attempts: The limited discretion granted to the Administrator by section 309(a)(5)(B) may only be exercised where the Administrator is able to determine that a discharger acted in good faith.
cited
Cited "see"
Republic Steel Corp. v. Costle
See Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Train, 544 F.2d 657, 659-60 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. den., 430 U.S. 975 , 97 S.Ct. 1666 , 52 L.Ed.2d 369 (1977). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter T. Best
(2×)
Federal Common Law 23 In reviewing the decision of a lower court, we must affirm if the result is correct, although the lower court relied upon a wrong ground or gave a wrong reason, Helvering v. Gowran, 302 U.S. 238, 245 , 58 S.Ct. 154 , 82 L.Ed. 224 (1937), since "(i)t would be wasteful to send a case back to a lower court to reinstate a decision which it had already made but which the appellate court concluded should properly be based on another ground within the power of the appellate court to formulate." SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 88 , 63 S.Ct. 454, 459 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943); see …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Randy GREENAWALT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART, Et Al., Respondents-Appellees
"When a district court lists several reasons for taking a certain action, and one of the reasons is flawed, the district court's decision should still be upheld if other reasons support the ruling." United States v. Stanffer, 922 F.2d 508, 516 (9th Cir.1990); see also United States v. Stevens, 548 F.2d 1360 , 1363 n. 9 (9th Cir.) ("Even were we willing to assume that the court `did the right thing for the wrong reason,' we would stifi be bound to affirm based on any grounds which validate the lower court's result."), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 975 , 97 S.Ct. 1666 , 52 L.Ed.2d 369 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Petty
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 76-6441.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1977.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.