green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Arnett v. Lewis
See United States v. Rodriguez-Gastelum, 569 F.2d 482, 486-88 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2266 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978); See also United States v. Wilson, 571 *1538 F.2d 455, 456 (9th Cir.1978) (same); United States v. Pheaster, 544 F.2d 353, 368 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied sub nom Inciso v. United States, 429 U.S. 1099 , 97 S.Ct. 1118 , 51 L.Ed.2d 546 (1977) (finding no violation of Miranda when officer informed suspect of the extent of the evidence against him). 51.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Felicitas N. Fuller
See United States v. Gillings, 568 F.2d 1807 , 1308-09 (9th Cir.) (the record must show “that the defendant understands the charges and the manner in which an attorney can be of assistance”), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2267 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978); see also United States v. Balough, 820 F.2d 1485, 1487-88 (9th Cir.1987); United States v. Kimmel, 672 F.2d 720, 721 (9th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wesley Willie
(2×)
See United States v. Gillings, 568 F.2d 1307 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2267 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry A. Turnbull
See United States v. Gillings, 568 F.2d 1307, 1308-09 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2267 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Floyd Balough
(2×)
Accordingly, we have held that "[a] waiver of counsel cannot be knowing and intelligent unless the accused appreciates the possible consequences of mishandling these core functions and the lawyer's superior ability to perform them." United States v. Kimmel, 672 F.2d 720, 721 (9th Cir.1982); see United States v. Gillings, 568 F.2d 1307, 1308-09 (9th Cir.) (district court "must assure itself that the defendant understands the charges and the manner in which an attorney can be of assistance."), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2267 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lexie Little Carter
See United States v. Garrett, 574 F.2d 778,783 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2265 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Turner v. Housewright
See United States v. Rodriguez-Gastelum, 569 F.2d 482, 486 (9th Cir.1978) cert. denied 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2266 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gazzara
See United States v. Rodriguez-Gastelum, 569 F.2d 482, 486 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (“Okay, okay, but with an attorney” held sufficient invocation), cer t. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2266 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Coelho
State v. Darcy, R.I., 442 A.2d 900 (1982); accord United States v. Gillings, 568 F.2d 1307, 1310 (9th Cir. 1978) cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2267 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978); Lee v. United States, 385 A.2d 159 (D.C.App.1978); Chandler v. State, Ind., 419 N.E.2d 142, 144-45 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark A. Thierman
(2×)
See United States v. RodriguezGastelum, 569 F.2d 482, 483 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2266 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Austin v. Israel
See United States v. Garrett, 574 F.2d 778 , 780-81 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2265 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978); United States v. Robinson, 545 F.2d 301, 305-06 (2d Cir. 1976) ; United States v. Diggs, 527 F.2d 509, 513-15 (8th Cir. 1975) (dictum); United States v. Woodring, 464 F.2d 1248, 1251 (10th Cir. 1972); Cohen v. United States, 378 F.2d 751, 755 (9th Cir. 1967); United States v. Barash, 365 F.2d 395, 402-03 (2d Cir. 1966); United States v. Denton, 336 F.2d 785, 788 (6th Cir. 1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert R. Romero
Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835 , 95 S.Ct. 2525, 2541 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); see United States v. Gillings, 568 F.2d 1307, 1308-09 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2267 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Buck Austin v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior
See Moorer v. Dept. of HUD, 561 F.2d 175 (CA8 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 [ 98 S.Ct. 2266 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 ] (1978); Dawson v. U.S. Dept. of HUD, 428 F.Supp. 328 (N D Ga. 1976); Parlane Sportswear Co. v. Weinberger, 381 F.Supp. 410 (Mass.1974), aff’d, 513 F.2d 835, 837 (CA1), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 925 [ 96 S.Ct. 269 , 46 L.Ed.2d 252 ] (1975). 441 U.S. at 48 n.9, 99 S.Ct. at 1579 n.9.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Keith Lamont Hart
See United States v. Rodriguez-Gastelum, 569 F.2d 482 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2266 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978); White v. Finkbeiner, 570 F.2d 194 (7th Cir. 1978); United States v. Cavallino, 498 F.2d 1200 (5th Cir. 1974); United States v. Tafoya, 459 F.2d 424 (10th Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lindsey
(2×)
See, United States v. Gillings, 568 F.2d 1307 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2267 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978); State v. Hunt, 118 Ariz. 431 , 577 P.2d 717 (1978); People v. Goodman, 55 Ill.App.3d 294 , 13 Ill.Dec. 473 , 371 N.E.2d 168 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
See Moorer v. Dept. of HUD, 561 F. 2d 175 (CA8 1977), cert. denied, 436 U. S. 919 (1978); Dawson v. U. S. Dept. of HUD, 428 F. Supp. 328 (ND Ga. 1976); Parlane Sportswear Co. v. Weinberger, 381 F. Supp. 410 (Mass. 1974), aff’d, 513 F. 2d 835, 837 (CA1), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 925 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Sanders v. Rowe
See United States v. Rodriguez-Gastelum, 569 F.2d 482 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2266 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978); Nash v. Estelle, 560 F.2d 652 (5th Cir. 1977), rehearing en banc granted, No. 75-3772 (Dec. 15, 1977); United States v. Grant, 549 F.2d 942 (4th Cir. 1977); Cf. Maglio v. Jago, 580 F.2d 202 (6th Cir. 1978) (reserving question); see cases collected at People v. Grant, 45 N.Y.2d 358 , 363 n.1, 408 N.Y.S.2d 429 , 434 n.1, 380 N.E.2d 257 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peter R. Fitzpatrick v. Louie L. Wainwright
I have not felt that I needed [counsel]."); see also Trial Record at 85. 109 Other factors considered by courts in determining the validity of a Faretta waiver include whether the waiver was a result of coercion or mistreatment of the defendant, Blassingame v. Estelle, 604 F.2d 893 (5th Cir.1979), whether the exchange between the defendant and the court consisted merely of pro forma answers to pro forma questions, United States v. Gillings, 568 F.2d 1307, 1309 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2267 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978); United States v. Curcio, 680 F.2d 881, 889 (2d Cir.1982…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward F. Ross
See, e. g., United States v. Garrett, 574 F.2d 778 , 783 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2265 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gretzler
See also United States v. Rodriguez-Gastelum, 569 F.2d 482 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2266 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ethical Restraints of the ABA Code of Professional Responsibility on Federal Criminal Investigations
See, e.g., United States v. Rodriguez-Gastelum, 569 F.2d 482 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert, denied, 436 U.S. 919 (1978); United States v. Cobbs, 481 F.2d 196 (3d Cir. 1973), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 980 (1973); Coughlan v. United States, supra, 391 F.2d at 372 (rejecting claim that Sixth Amendment right to counsel may be waived only with counsel present).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Henry Reeves
See also United States v. Garrett, 574 F.2d 778 , 782-83 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2265 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978); United States v. Littlebear, 531 F.2d 896, 898 (8th Cir. 1976); United States v. Eaglin, 571 F.2d 1069, 1075-76 (9th Cir. 1977) (en banc); United States v. Woodring, 464 F.2d 1248, 1251 (10th Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Edwards
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Rodriguez-Gastelum, 569 F.2d 482, 484 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919 , 98 S.Ct. 2266 , 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978); United States v. Tokoph, 514 F.2d 597, 605 (10th Cir. 1975); United States v. Howard, 152 U.S.App.D.C. 258, 259-60 , 470 F.2d 406, 407-08 (1972); State v. Knapp, 114 Ariz. 531, 538 , 562 P.2d 704, 711 (1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 908 , 98 S.Ct. 1458 , 55 L.Ed.2d 500 (1978); State v. Gholson, 112 Ariz. 545, 548 , 544 P.2d 654, 657 (1976); State v. Garrison, 16 Or.App. 588 , 519 P.2d 1295, 1300-01 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Woodson
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-6346.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 22, 1978.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.