green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.2 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1999 · 2 courts ·
…fear of force is an element of robbery and the conviction of robbery presumes that such fear was present.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Patrick Poland v. Terry L. Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
(2×)
fear of force is an element of robbery and the conviction of robbery presumes that such fear was present.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Timmons v. State
the decisional law in effect at the time an appeal is decided governs the issues raised on appeal, even where there has been a change of law since the time of trial.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Poland
(2×)
fear of force is an element of robbery and the conviction of robbery presumes that such fear was present.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Jeffers
(2×)
See State v. Watson, 120 Ariz. 441 , 586 P. 2d 1253 (1978) (requiring the trial court to consider nonstatutory mitigating factors), cert. denied, 440 U. S. 924 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ritch
See State v. Watson, 120 Ariz. 441 , 586 P.2d 1253 , cert. denied, 440 U.S. 924 , 99 S.Ct. 1254 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gert Albertus Theron
United States v. Timmreck, 441 U.S. 780, 783-85 , 99 S.Ct. 2085, 2087-88 , 60 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979); Lilly, 792 F.2d at 1545 & n. 7; Good Bird, 752 F.2d at 351 & n. 3; see Evers v. United States, 579 F.2d 71, 73 (10th Cir.1978) (technical violation of Rule 11 held harmless on collateral review), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 924 , 99 S.Ct. 1253 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ramseur
(2×)
By establishing a prior conviction as an aggravating factor the State adequately fulfills its constitutional duty to narrow the class of persons eligible for the death penalty and ... [to] reasonably justify the imposition of a more severe sentence on the defendant compared to others found guilty of murder. [ Id. at 877, 103 S.Ct. at 2748, 77 L.Ed. 2d at 249-50.] In fact, Zant specifically approved the Georgia death penalty statute, Ga. Code § 27-2503 (1975), which allows the sentencer to consider as aggravating information "prior criminal convictions and pleas of guilty or pleas of nolo cont…
discussed
Cited "see"
Marrero v. State
See Wheeler v. State, 344 So.2d 244 (Fla. 1977), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 924 , 99 S.Ct. 1254 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 (1979); McGoff v. State, 450 So.2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); McIntire v. State, 381 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
examined
Cited "see"
Coleman v. State
(4×)
See Coleman II, 605 P.2d at 1057 , cert. den. [ 446 U.S. 970 ] 100 S.Ct. 2952 [ 64 L.Ed.2d 831 ] and State v. Watson, [ 120 Ariz. 441 ,] Ariz., 586 P.2d 1253, 1258 (1978), cert. den. 440 U.S. 924 [ 99 S.Ct. 1254 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 ]. *660 The majority, in its omnibus ruling in part V disposed of this and 12 other issues on the ground that they are res judicata and vague.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ralph Riegelsperger
(2×)
See Evers v. United States, 579 F.2d 71, 73 (10th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 924 , 99 S.Ct. 1253 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 (1979), indicating that a guilty plea should be set aside "only where to not do so would result in a miscarriage of justice, or where there exists (sic) exceptional circumstances justifying such relief." 49 A guilty plea should not be set aside merely because of a formal violation of Rule 11.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Greenawalt
A.R.S. § 13-454(E)(2); see State v. Watson, 120 Ariz. 441 , 586 P.2d 1253 (1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 924 , 99 S.Ct. 1254 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Steelman
See State v. Steelman, supra. However, we remanded the matter for resentencing on the two murder charges, pursuant to State v. Watson, 120 Ariz. 441 , 586 P.2d 1253 (1978), cert. den. 440 U.S. 924 , 99 S.Ct. 1254 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. McFarlin
See State v. Watson, 120 Ariz. 441 , 586 P.2d 1253 (1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 924 , 99 S.Ct. 1254 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 .
cited
Cited "see"
Edward Parton v. Donald Wyrick, Warden John Ashcroft, Attorney General, State of Missouri
See generally Hampton v. Wyrick, 588 F.2d 632, 634 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 924 , 99 S.Ct. 1253 , 59 L.Ed.2d 477 (1979); Hess v. United States, 496 F.2d 936, 938 (8th Cir. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kocha & Jones, PA v. Greenwald
Lowe v. Price, 437 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1983); see also Wheeler v. State, 344 So.2d 244 (Fla. 1977), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 924 , 99 S.Ct. 1254 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 (1979); Collins v. Wainwright, 311 So.2d 787 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. dismissed, 315 So.2d 97 (Fla. 1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barry B. Boyer v. Duane Shillinger and Attorney General of the State of Wyoming
United States v. Timmreck, 441 U.S. 780 (1979); see also Evers v. United States, 579 F.2d 71, 73 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 924 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tittle
See also State v. Watson, 120 Ariz. 441, 448 , 586 P.2d 1253, 1260 (1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 924 , 99 S.Ct. 1254 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 (1978) (Fear of force is an element of robbery and the conviction of robbery presumes that such fear was present); accord, State v. Poland, 144 Ariz. 388, 406 , 698 P.2d 183, 201 (1985), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 60 , 88 L.Ed.2d 49 (1985) (Poland II).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gay
See, e.g., State v. Watson, 120 Ariz. 441 , 586 P.2d 1253 (1978), cert, denied, 440 U.S. 924 , 99 S.Ct. 1254 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 (1979) (Arizona statutory provision struck down confining defendant to limited number of specific mitigating matters); People v. Dist.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Henry Knapp, Arizona State Prison Inmate No. 33659, and All Inmates of the Arizona State Prison Similarly Situated v. Harold Cardwell
Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 , 98 S.Ct. 2954 , 57 L.Ed.2d 973 (1978); see also Bell v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 637 , 98 S.Ct. 2977 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1978). 6 The Arizona Supreme Court reacted to the Lockett decision by deciding in State v. Watson, 120 Ariz. 441 , 586 P.2d 1253 (1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 924 , 99 S.Ct. 1254 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 (1979), that section 13-454 was unconstitutional insofar as it limited the right of the defendant to show additional mitigating circumstances. 120 Ariz. at 445 , 586 P.2d at 1257 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tichnell v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Watson, 120 Ariz. 441 , 586 P.2d 1253, 1258-259 (1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 924 , 99 S.Ct. 1254 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 (1979); State v. Pierre, 572 P.2d *734 1338, 1346-348 (Utah 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 882 , 99 S.Ct. 219 , 58 L.Ed.2d 194 (1978); State v. Barfield, 298 N.C. 306 , 259 S.E.2d 510, 543-44 (1979); State v. Johnson, 298 N.C. 47 , 257 S.E.2d 597, 617-18 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hampton
v.
Wyrick, Warden
v.
Wyrick, Warden
No. 78-5903.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1979.
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.