In re Schulman, 444 U.S. 838 (1979). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Schulman, 444 U.S. 838 (1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
123 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 33 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Runge (md, 1989-11-27) · Strongest negative: Board of School Commissioners v. James (mdctspecapp, 1993-06-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" Board of School Commissioners v. James
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1993 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Resetar v. State Bd. of Educ., 284 Md. 537, 547-550 , 399 A.2d 225 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 74 , 62 L.Ed.2d 49 (1979) (teacher urged Court to follow Vitarelli — one of the Accardi cases — to hold a local board was “bound by its own regulations,” see Reply Brief at 19; Court of Appeals did not discuss Accardi or Vitarelli but declined to follow them in view of the fact that, as here, the teacher "suffered no prejudice” and "no penalty” was provided for violation of regulation). 6 .
discussed Cited "but see" Rivers v. Rosenthal & Company
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129 , 133 n.7 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979) (noting summarily in dictum that "(s)uch actions are well recognized."); Hirk v. Agri-Research Council, Inc., 561 F.2d 96 , 103 & n.8 (7th Cir. 1977) (similar perfunctory assertion).
discussed Cited "but see" Rivers v. Rosenthal & Co.
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129 , 133 n.7 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979) (noting summarily in dictum that “[s]uch actions are well recognized.”); Hirk v. Agri-Research Council, Inc., 561 F.2d 96 , 103 & n.8 (7th Cir. 1977) (similar perfunctory assertion).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Runge
Md. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Resetar v. State Bd. of Education, 284 Md. 537, 547-550 , 399 A.2d 225, 230-232 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 74 , 62 L.Ed.2d 49 (1979) (context of statute sometimes requires “may” to be interpreted as mandatory).
discussed Cited "see" Farmland Industries v. Frazier-Parrott Commodities, Inc. (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
8th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129, 133-34 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Farmland Industries v. Frazier-Parrott Commodities, Inc. (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
8th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129, 133-34 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979).
cited Cited "see" James L. Osborn, Jr. v. E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
8th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129, 133-34 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Kale
E.D. Pa. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ellis, 595 F.2d 154 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 75 , 62 L.Ed.2d 49 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Mitchell v. Goodyear Service Store
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Resetar v. State Bd. of Education, 284 Md. 537, 554 , 399 A.2d 225, 238-39 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 74 , 62 L.Ed.2d 49 (1979); Grosman v. Real Estate Comm’n, 267 Md. 259, 265 , 297 A.2d 257, 260 (1972); Mayor of Baltimore v. Bowen, 54 Md.App. 375, 386 , 458 A.2d 1242, 1249 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Kirkland v. EF Hutton and Co., Inc.
E.D. Mich. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979); Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co., 424 F.Supp. 1021 (S.D.N.Y. 1977), aff’d, 570 F.2d 38 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1039 , 99 S.Ct. 642 , 58 L.Ed.2d 698 (1978) (circuit court did not reach issue of implied right of action); Shull v. Dain, Kalman & Quail, Inc., 561 F.2d 152 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978); Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc., 554 F.2d 790 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, …
discussed Cited "see" Brodak v. Brodak (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Md. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Resetar v. State Board of Education, 284 Md. 537, 548 , 399 A.2d 225 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 (1979); Maryland State Bar Association v. Frank, 272 Md. 528, 533 , 325 A.2d 718 (1974); Pope v. Secretary of Personnel, 46 Md.
discussed Cited "see" Smith v. Commonwealth
Mass. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Ellis, 595 F.2d 154 ,163 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 (1979); United States v. Hathaway, 534 F.2d 386, 402 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 819 (1976); United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 146 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 (1975); United States v. Leonard, 494 F.2d 955, 972-973 (D.C.
discussed Cited "see" Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Curran (2×)
SCOTUS · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F. 2d 129, 133, n. 7 (CA8) (dictum), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 838 (1979); Hirk v. Agri-Research Council, Inc., 561 F. 2d 96, 103, n. 8 (CA7 1977).
cited Cited "see" Mccluskey v. Board Of Education Of Rogers
8th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129, 131 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979).
cited Cited "see" McCcuskey v. Board of Education of Rogers, Arkansas
8th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129, 131 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Bellamy v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Resetar v. State Board of Education, 284 Md. 537, 548 , 399 A.2d 225 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 (1979); Maryland State Bar Association v. Frank, 272 Md. 528, 533 , 325 A.2d 718 (1974); Pope v. Secretary of Personnel, 46 Md.
cited Cited "see" In Re James S.
Md. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See the discussion in Resetar v. State Bd. of Education, 284 Md. 537, 548-50 , 399 A.2d 225 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S. Ct. 74 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Columbia Road Citizens' Ass'n v. Montgomery County
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Resetar v. State Bd. of Education, 284 Md. 537, 547 , 399 A.2d 225 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 74 , 62 L.Ed.2d 49 (1979) (mandatory or directory nature dependent on legislative intent, subject matter and purpose of provision); Moss v. Director, 279 Md. 561, 564-65 , 369 A.2d 1011 (1977) (look to context of provision for mandatory or directory nature); Prince George’s County v. McBride, 268 Md. 522, 533 , 302 A.2d 620 (1973) (nature of provision dependent in large part on character, purpose and legislative intent); Tucker, 89 Md.App. at 298 , 598 A.2d 479 (courts look to…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Khalid Bin Alwaleed Foundation v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
N.D. Ill. · 1989 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129 , 133 n. 7 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1979) (investor may maintain an action against his broker for violations of anti-fraud provisions of the CEA) (dictum) with Rivers v. Rosenthal & Co., 634 F.2d 774 (5th Cir.1980), vacated, 456 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2228 , 72 L.Ed.2d 841 (1982) (no private right of action available).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Liberty Life Insurance Co. v. United States, 594 F.2d 21, 24 (4th Cir.) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 74 , 62 L.Ed.2d 49 (1979); 8 Mertens, The Law of Federal Income Taxation § 44.38 (Rev.1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thompson v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.
N.D. Ga. · 1982 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 , 62 L.Ed.2d 50 (1980) and Buttrey v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 410 F.2d 135 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 396 U.S. 838 , 90 S.Ct. 98 , 24 L.Ed.2d 88 (1969) (private cause of action exists where accompanied by allegations of fraud) with Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., 614 F.2d 677 (9th Cir. 1980) (no implied private right of action for violation of “know your customer” and “suitability” rules).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Sherry v. Diercks
Wash. Ct. App. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129, 134 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 62 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. City Of Philadelphia
3rd Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Ellis, 595 F.2d 154 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 75 , 62 L.Ed.2d 49 (1979).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. City of Philadelphia
3rd Cir. · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Ellis, 595 F.2d 154 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 75 , 62 L.Ed.2d 49 (1979). . 106 Cong.Rec. 6308 (1960) (remarks of Congressman Celler).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Curran v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
6th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Goldman, 593 F.2d 129 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 838 , 100 S.Ct. 76 (1979); Moody v. Bache & Co., 570 F.2d 523 (5th Cir. 1978); Booth v. Peavey Co. Commodities Services, 430 F.2d 132 (8th Cir. 1970) (without explanation the court found a cause of action lies for churning a commodities account under the securities laws). .
In re Schulman
No. 78-1824.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
444 U.S. 838
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.