green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Chateau X, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Andrews
(4×)
In holding the Texas statute unconstitutional the Supreme Court emphasized: that the regulation of a communicative activity such as the exhibition of motion pictures must adhere to more narrowly drawn procedures than is necessary for the abatement of an ordinary nuisance, and ... that the burden of supporting an injunction against a future exhibition is even heavier than the burden of justifying the imposition of a criminal sanction for a past communication. 445 U.S. at 315-16, 100 S.Ct. at 1160-61, 63 L.Ed.2d at 420 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Cinema I Video, Inc. v. Thornburg
(2×)
See Andrews v. Chateau X, 296 N.C. 251 , 250 S.E. 2d 603 (1979), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 445 U.S. 947 , 63 L.Ed. 2d 782 , 100 S.Ct. 1593 (1980), affirmed, 302 N.C. 321 , 275 S.E. 2d 443 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Citizens For A Better Henderson v. Hodel
See Ventura County v. Gulf Oil Corp., 601 F.2d 1080, 1083 (9th Cir.1979), aff'd, 445 U.S. 947 , 100 S.Ct. 1593 , 63 L.Ed.2d 782 (1980) (authority given to government's lessee).
cited
Cited "see"
Citizens for a Better Henderson v. Hodel
See Ventura County v. Gulf Oil Corp., 601 F.2d 1080, 1083 (9th Cir.1979), aff'd, 445 U.S. 947 , 100 S.Ct. 1593 , 63 L.Ed.2d 782 (1980) (authority given to government’s lessee).
cited
Cited "see"
Elliott v. Oregon International Mining Co.
See Ventura v. Gulf Oil Corp., 601 F2d 1080 (9th Cir 1979), aff’d 445 US 947 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Kirkpatrick Oil & Gas Company v. United States of America and Thomas S. Kleppe, Secretary of the Interior
See Ventura County v. Gulf Oil Corp., 601 F.2d 1080, 1085 (9th Cir. 1979), aff’d mem., 445 U.S. 947 , 100 S.Ct. 1593 , 63 L.Ed.2d 782 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coyote v. Roberts
See Poe v. North Carolina, 445 U.S. 947 , 100 S.Ct. 1593 , 63 L.Ed.2d 782 (1980), dismissing, for want of substantial federal question, appeal from 40 N.C.App. 385 , 252 S.E.2d 843 (1979); Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney, 425 U.S. 901 , 96 S.Ct. 1489 , 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976), summarily aff’g 403 F.Supp. 1199 (E.D.Va.1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Chappell v. State
See also Hutto v. Davis, 445 U. S. 947 (102 SC 1742, 70 LE2d 556).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chateau X, Inc.
v.
Andrews, District Attorney for the Fourth District of North Carolina
v.
Andrews, District Attorney for the Fourth District of North Carolina
No. 78-1391.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 1980.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Vance v. Universal Amusement Co., ante, p. 308. Mr. Justice White dissents.