green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1989 ·
…a defendant who asks for an instruction will not be heard to complain about the instruction on appeal
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Stuckey v. Northern Propane Gas Co.
a defendant who asks for an instruction will not be heard to complain about the instruction on appeal
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Stuckey v. Northern Propane Gas Co.
a defendant who asks for an instruction will not be heard to complain about the instruction on appeal
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moran
See ___ DeVincent v. United States, 632 F.2d 145, 146 (1st Cir.) _________ ______________ (holding that there was no error in denying reconsideration of dismissal of 2255 motion on the basis of a speculative request for broad-scale discovery and evidentiary hearing, which sought to subpoena grand jury foreman and members, the Assistant United States Attorney and his aides, the court stenographer, and the stenographer's notes and transcripts, and to allow the questioning of all parties concerned about the way in which the indictment was voted and returned), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 (1980); U…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moran
See DeVincent v. United States, 632 F.2d 145, 146 (1st Cir.) (holding that there was no error in denying reconsideration of dismissal of Sec. 2255 motion on the basis of a speculative request for broad-scale discovery and evidentiary hearing, which sought to subpoena grand jury foreman and members, the Assistant United States Attorney and his aides, the court stenographer, and the stenographer's notes and transcripts, and to allow the questioning of all parties concerned about the way in which the indictment was voted and returned), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 (1980); United States v. Lewis, 6…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bryan Allen Hartsfield
See United States v. Bowie, 892 F.2d at 1497 (quoting United States v. Batimana, 623 F.2d 1366, 1368 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 617 , 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980)).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Federal Grand Jury. In Re Chester Wheeler Campbell
See De Vincent v. United States, 602 F.2d 1006, 1009-10 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 (1980) (discussing the ability to discover grand jury material in § 2255 cases under Fed.R.Crim.P. 6).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Manuel Vigoa
See United States v. Batimana, 623 F.2d 1366, 1369 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arthur Michael Newman v. United States
See United States v. Anderson, 654 F.2d 1264, 1268-69 (8th Cir.) (§ 846 conspiracy is separate crime from underlying drug offense, requiring proof of at least one element not required by the latter), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 1127 , 102 S.Ct. 978 , 71 L.Ed.2d 115 (1981); accord United States v. Batimana, 623 F.2d 1366, 1370 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 617 , 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980); see also *639 Iannelli v. United States, 420 U.S. 770 , 785 n. 17, 95 S.Ct. 1284 , 1293-94 n. 17, 43 L.Ed.2d 616 (1975) (gambling conspiracy and substantive gambling offenses are separate crimes…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Israel Valles-Valencia, United States of America v. Ricardo Vigil Bustamante, United States of America v. Guillermo Soto-Leal
See United States v. Batimana, 623 F.2d 1366, 1369-70 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 617 , 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Butler v. United States
See United States v. Batimana, 623 F.2d 1366, 1368 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 617 , 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John M. Arruda, United States of America v. Edward Ringland
See United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 638 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 , 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 618 , 66 L.Ed.2d 501 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James R. Monaco and Eugene O. Hicks
See United States v. Gray, 626 F.2d 494, 497-98 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 616 , 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980), 449 U.S. 1091 , 101 S.Ct. 887 , 66 L.Ed.2d 820 (1981) & 450 U.S. 919 , 101 S.Ct. 1367 , 67 L.Ed.2d 346 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Wright v. United States
Dalli v. United States, 491 F.2d at 760-61 ; see DeVincent v. United States, 632 F.2d 145, 146 (1st Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 618 , 66 L.Ed.2d 501 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Deluca, Robert Kaye, James Danno, and John Lee
See United States v. Batimana, 623 F.2d 1366, 1368 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 617 , 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bradfield
Compare United States v. Lane, 693 F.2d 385, 387 (5th Cir. 1982)(applying Williamson to fees contingent on implication) with United States v. Gray, 626 F.2d 494, 499 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S. Ct. 616 (1980)(applying Williamson to fees contingent on conviction). 30 United States v. Cervantes-Pacheco, 826 F.2d 310, 315 (5th Cir. 1987), cert. denied sub nom., 484 U.S. 1026 , 108 S. Ct. 749 (1988). 31 The need to treat witnesses who are compensated for their testimony consistently with witnesses who are promised a reduced sentence in exchange for their testimony, th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roy C. Bradfield and Lee Andrew Williams
Compare United States v. Lane, 693 F.2d 385, 387 (5th Cir. 1982) (applying Williamson to fees contingent on implication) with United States v. Gray, 626 F.2d 494, 499 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 616 , 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980) (applying Williamson to fees contingent on conviction). 30 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dianne Sutherland, United States of America v. Alan W. Fini
Petrozziello, 548 F.2d at 23 ; see also United States v. Ciampaglia, 628 F.2d 632, 637-38 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S.Ct. 365 , 66 L.Ed.2d 221 and 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 618 , 66 L.Ed.2d 501 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James E. Smith
See, e.g., United States v. Batimana, 623 F.2d 1366, 1369 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 617 , 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dela Espriella
See, e.g., United States v. Batimana, 623 F.2d 1366, 1368 (9th Cir.) (defendants acted as lookouts), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 617 , 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980); United States v. Haro-Espinosa, 619 F.2d 789, 794 (9th Cir.1979) (defendant rented motel room and lent co-conspirator his car).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antoinette Dela Espriella, United States of America v. Margaret Caro, United States of America v. Alberto Dela Espriella, United States of America v. Pablo Chapoy, United States of America v. Gustavo Ricardo Ronderos
See, e.g., United States v. Batimana, 623 F.2d 1366, 1368 (9th Cir.) (defendants acted as lookouts), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 , 101 S.Ct. 617 , 66 L.Ed.2d 500 (1980); United States v. Haro-Espinosa, 619 F.2d 789, 794 (9th Cir.1979) (defendant rented motel room and lent co-conspirator his car).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fennell
v.
United States and Wright v. United States
v.
United States and Wright v. United States
No. 80-5648; No. 80-5656.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 1980.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below r 626 F. 2d 494.