green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 1994 ·
…a state court or legislature does not necessarily seek to further or even consider federal laws when it develops its choice of law provisions. a federal choice of law rule would address those concerns.
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Halkias v. General Dynamics Corp.
a state court or legislature does not necessarily seek to further or even consider federal laws when it develops its choice of law provisions. a federal choice of law rule would address those concerns.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
JOHN HALKIAS, ET AL., Plaintiffs, JOHN HALKIAS and BARRY JACKSON v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
a state court or legislature does not necessarily seek to further or even consider federal laws when it develops its choice of law provisions. a federal choice of law rule would address those concerns.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
JOHN HALKIAS, ET AL., Plaintiffs, JOHN HALKIAS and BARRY JACKSON v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
a state court or legislature does not necessarily seek to further or even consider federal laws when it develops its choice of law provisions. a federal choice of law rule would address those concerns.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mitchell
See United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371, 1381 (9th Cir. 1980) (‘‘Blockburger is merely a method for ascertaining the congressional intent to impose sepa- rate punishment for multiple offenses which arise dur- ing the course of a single act or transaction’’), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S. Ct. 863 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Arndt v. UBS AG
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 790 (2d Cir.1980) (''[Tjhe presence of aliens on two sides of a case destroys diversity jurisdiction”), cer t. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); accord IIT v. Vencap Ltd., 519 F.2d 1001, 1015 (2d Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Attorney General of Canada v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 789 (2d Cir.1980) ("[T]he fact that alien parties [are] present on both sides ... destroy[s] complete diversity”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (a).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Bidermann Industries U.S.A., Inc.
See In re Best Products Co., Inc., 168 B.R. 35, 51 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1994) (citing Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 795 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981)) (federal common law in specialized areas where jurisdiction is not based on diversity has been sanctioned by the Supreme Court since the Erie case was decided).
discussed
Cited "see"
Humphries v. Mack Trucks Inc
See Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 853 (4th Cir. 1980) (finding that the ground for the objection was clear, particularly because the defendant had filed a pre-trial motion with supporting memoranda requesting the suppression of the evidence at issue), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 (1981); United States v. Cummiskey, 728 F.2d 200, 205 (3d Cir. 1984) (finding the context of the objection sufficient to compensate for the lack of specificity where the district court's rulings on post-trial motions demonstrated that the court was aware of the grounds for the objection), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd.
See Int’l Shipping Co., 875 F.2d at 391 (“[T]he presence of aliens on two sides of a case destroys diversity jurisdiction.”) (quoting Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 790 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981)); D’Arboise v. Sommelier’s Cellars, 741 F.Supp. 489, 490 (S.D.N.Y.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marathon Oil Co. v. Ruhrgas
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 790 (2d Cir.1980) (noting that the presence of aliens on both sides of the case defeats diversity jurisdiction), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Midwest Specialties, Inc. v. Crown Industrial Products Co.
See Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 858 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 477 F.Supp. 615, 621 (S.D.N.Y.1979), modified on other grounds, 629 F.2d 786 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); 6 Charles A. Wright, Arthur R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. Tonawanda Band Of Seneca Indians
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 477 F.Supp. 615, 621 (S.D.N.Y.1979), modified on other grounds, 629 F.2d 786 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); 6 CHARLES A. WRIGHT, ARTHUR R.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Lloyd's American Trust Fund Litigation
See Corporación Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786 (2d Cir.1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981) (finding jurisdiction under Section 632, in an action alleging fraudulent inducement, on the basis of a letter of credit issued by a federally chartered bank no longer party to the suit); see also Conjugal Soc’y Composed of Juvenal Rosa v. Chicago Title Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
First National Bank of Joliet v. Promatek Medical Systems, Inc.
(2×)
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786 (2d Cir.1980) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); Consorcio de Fomento Industrial S.A. v. First National Bank of Chicago, 1993 WL 291706 (N.D.Ill.
cited
Cited "see"
Coffey v. Chemical Specialties, Inc.
See Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 858 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 (1981); Higgins, 671 F. Supp. at 1059-1060 ; W.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
38 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1213, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,528 in Re Joint Eastern District and Southern District Asbestos Litigation. Anne McPadden Individually and as of the Estate of Martin McPadden (Deceased) v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Fibreboard Corporation Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation Celotex Corporation Eagle-Picher Industries, Incorporated Gaf Corporation Pittsburgh Corning Corporation H.K. Porter Company, Inc. Owens-Illinois, Incorporated A.P. Green Industries Inc. U.S. Mineral Products Co. A.C. And S. Inc. United States Gypsum Co. National Gypsum Company Babcock & Wilcox Company Combustion Engineering, Inc. Rockwool Manufacturing Co. v. John Crane-Houdaille Inc.
Accord Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 856-58 (4th Cir.1980) (subsequent revised warnings of drug's side effects were not admissible under either negligence or strict products liability principles), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981). 19 In denying Crane's post-trial motion, the district court concluded that "plaintiff's use of the label evidence focused on the statement that no warning labels were placed on the products at the time of McPadden's exposure, not that the labels were placed on the products later because Crane recognized the danger." 798 F.Supp…
discussed
Cited "see"
McPadden v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
Accord Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 856-58 (4th Cir.1980) (subsequent revised warnings of drug’s side effects were not admissible under either negligence or strict products liability principles), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Kelvin Williams v. United States
See United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371, 1379 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 (1981); Iannelli v. United States, 420 U.S. 770, 777-78 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Koreag, Controle et Revision S.A. v. Refco F/X Associates, Inc.
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 795 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re: Koreag, Controle Et Revision S.A.
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 795 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Koreag, Controle et Revision S.A. v. Refco F/X Associates, Inc. (In re Koreag, Controle et Revision S.A.)
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 795 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Joanne Kotler, Individually and as Administratrix, Etc. v. The American Tobacco Company
Accord Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 858 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Don King Productions, Inc. v. Douglas
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 793 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981) (choice-of-law .clause in first loan agreement applied to govern related, second loan agreement among same parties, absent indication of parties’ contrary intent).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick Pelkington, Loynas Boquette, Peter Tranchida, and Robert Faxas
Accord United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371, 1378 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied sub nom., Perluss v. United States, 449 U.S. 1080 (1981); United States v. Johnson, 565 F.2d 179, 182 (1st Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1075 (1978); United States v. Graves, 556 F.2d 1319, 1322-23 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 (1978). "[O]utrageous involvement turns upon the totality of the circumstances with no single factor controlling." United States v. Tobias, 662 F.2d 381, 387 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1108 (1982). 15 The genesis of the "outrageous governmental conduct" defense l…
discussed
Cited "see"
19 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 583, prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,904 Sherwin W. Fish and Leona B. Fish, Cross-Appellants v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Diamond International Corporation and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, Georgia-Pacific Corporation and Diamond International Corporation, Cross-Appellees
Accord Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 853 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981). 15 Nor was the evidence of the warning admissible on the limited issue of the "feasibility" of providing a warning in 1977.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Espinosa
See United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371, 1382 (9th Cir. 1980) ("we conclude that Congress did intend to allow courts to impose consecutive sentences for conspiracy ( 21 U.S.C. § 846 ), and for substantive offenses ( 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1)), even when the proof necessary to obtain a conviction for the former was necessary to obtain a conviction for the latter offense”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank Itec N v. v. J. Henry Schroder Bank & Trust Co.
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 793 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); Hawes Office Systems, Inc. v. Wang Laboratories, Inc., 537 F.Supp. 939, 942 (E.D.N.Y.1982); CBS, Inc. v. Tucker, 412 F.Supp. 1222, 1226 (S.D.N.Y.1976); B.M.
cited
Cited "see"
Kittitas Reclamation District v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District
See Kittitas Reclamation Dist. v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation Dist., 626 F.2d 95 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1079 , 101 S.Ct. 861 , 66 L.Ed.2d 802 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry Hale and Linda Hale v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, the Budd Company. Larry Hale and Linda Hale v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, the Budd Company
Appellees do not contend that Budd had knowledge of the documents but rather argue that the documents were offered to prove defect and that knowledge by the manufacturer of the defect is not required in a strict liability case. 51 "Once evidence admissible for one purpose but inadmissible for another is admitted, the trial court cannot refuse a requested limiting instruction." Chematron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1185 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1013 , 103 S.Ct. 1254 , 75 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982); see Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 854 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hale v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
“Once evidence admissible for one purpose but inadmissible for another is admitted, the trial court cannot refuse a, requested limiting instruction.” Chematron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1185 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1013 , 103 S.Ct. 1254 , 75 L.Ed.2d 483 (1982); see Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848, 854 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glen McCullah Willard Petrey, James Tankersley, and Ewell Scott
(2×)
It has been flatly rejected by the Fifth Circuit, United States v. Pearson, 655 F.2d 569, 570 (5th Cir.1981) (per curiam) (citing United States v. Cowart, 595 F.2d 1023, 1032-34 (5th Cir.1979)); see United States v. Bankston, 603 F.2d 528, 534 (5th Cir.1979) (appropriate test looks "not to the evidence adduced at trial but focuse[s] on the elements of the offense charged"), and the Ninth Circuit, United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371 , 1381 n. 14 (9th Cir.1980) (citing United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358, 1367 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 971 , 98 S.Ct. 522 , 54 L.Ed.2d 460 (1977)), …
discussed
Cited "see"
Felix Cinematografica S.r.l. v. Penthouse International, Ltd.
See Corporacion Venezolana v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786 , 790 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); see also Clarkson Co. Ltd. v. Shaheen, 544 F.2d 624 , n. 5 (2d Cir.1976); but see Bergen Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Japan Marine Servs.
discussed
Cited "see"
Libra Bank Ltd. v. Banco Nacional De Costa Rica, S.A.
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales, 629 F.2d 786 , 793 (2d Cir.1980) (where loan agreement contained clause choosing New York law as governing, that choice of law was valid and binding upon loan agreement), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981). 28 Under New York law, a covenant in a note providing that the obligator shall pay attorneys’ fees and costs expended in the collection or enforcement of a note is enforceable.
cited
Cited "see"
Bernier v. BOARD OF COUNTY RD. COM'RS FOR IONIA COUNTY
See Werner v. Upjohn Co., 628 F.2d 848 at 853 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lowe
See United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
MARATHON OIL COMPANY, Marathon International Oil Company, and Marathon Petroleum Norge A/S v. A.G. RUHRGAS
See Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 790 (2d Cir.1980) (noting that the presence of aliens on both sides of the case defeats diversity jurisdiction), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Avilon Auto. Group v. Leontiev
The Second Circuit has explained that "diversity is lacking within the meaning of these sections where the only parties are foreign entities, or where on one side there are citizens and aliens and on the opposite side there are only aliens" ( Universal Licensing Corp. v Paola del Lungo S.p.A., 293 F3d 579, 581 [2d Cir 2002]; see also Corporation Venezolana de Fomento v Vintero Sales Corp. , 629 F2d 786, 790 [2d Cir 1980], cert denied 449 US 1080 [1981]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bank of America Corp. v. Lemgruber
Aaron Fever & Sons, Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, NA, 731 F.2d 112 , 121 (2d Cir.1984); see also Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786 (2d Cir.1980) (applying federal common law choice of law rules but New York State and Venezuelan substantive law to claims and counterclaims in Edge Act case), cert denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
STATE, DEPT. OF ECOLOGY v. Acquavella
See, e.g., Kittitas Reclamation Dist. v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation Dist., 626 F.2d 95 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1079 , 101 S.Ct. 861 , 66 L.Ed.2d 802 (1981); Schinmann v. United States, 618 F.Supp. 1030 (E.D.Wash.1985), aff'd mem., 811 F.2d 1508 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 924 , 108 S.Ct. 286 , 98 L.Ed.2d 246 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)
See, e.g., Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 793 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); Bank Itec N.V. v. J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Air Disaster at Lockerbie, Scotland on December 21, 1988. Denice H. Rein v. Pan American World Airways Incorporated, in Re Hijacking of Pan American World Airways, Inc. Aircraft at Karachi International Airport, Pakistan on September 5, 1986. Dilip Joshi, Nadya Hussain, Tahra Lodhi, Dilip Parikh, Faraidoon Oshtory v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
See, e.g., Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales, 629 F.2d 786 , 793 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); Aaron Ferer & Sons Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 731 F.2d 112 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rein v. Pan American World Airways Inc.
See, e.g., Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales, 629 F.2d 786 , 793 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981); Aaron Ferer & Sons Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 731 F.2d 112 (2d Cir. 1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barkanic v. General Administration of Civil Aviation of the People's Republic of China
See, e.g., Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 795 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Louise Agnes Barkanic v. General Administration Of Civil Aviation Of The People's Republic Of China
See, e.g., Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 795 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Trading Corporation of India, Ltd. v. Assuranceforeningen Skuld
Siegelman v. Cunard White Star, Ltd., 221 F.2d 189, 192-93 (2d Cir.1955); see also Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 795 (2d Cir.1980) (Klaxon rule inapplicable in federal question case), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Susan Rosenberg
(2×)
United States v. Cerone, 830 F.2d 938, 944 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 1730 , 100 L.Ed.2d 194 (1988); see Marden, 872 F.2d at 126 (no bar to successive prosecution based on Pinkerton doctrine); United States v. Manzella, 791 F.2d 1263, 1270 (7th Cir.1986) (no bar to retrying defendant for substantive offense on Pinkerton theory following affirmance of conspiracy conviction but reversal of substantive-offense conviction); see also United States v. Wylie, 625 F.2d 1371 , 1382 n. 15 (9th Cir.1980) (dictum), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Villari v. Terminix International, Inc.
See, e.g., Werner v. Upjohn Co., Inc., 628 F.2d 848, 856 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 862 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Kelley
(Hampton v. United States (1976) 425 U.S. 484, 489-491 [ 48 L.Ed.2d 113, 118-119 , 96 S.Ct. 1646 ]; United States v. Russell (1973) 411 U.S. 423 [ 36 L.Ed.2d 366 , 93 S.Ct. 1637 ]; see also United States v. Wylie (9th Cir. 1980) 625 F.2d 1371, 1377 , cert, den., 449 U.S. 1080 [ 66 L.Ed.2d 804 , 101 S.Ct. 863 ].) Instead, as noted, the California Supreme Court has chosen the objective test to assure the “lawfulness of law enforcement activity.” (People v. Barraza, supra, 23 Cal.3d at pp. 686-691.) Thus federal cases on entrapment such as Sorrells, supra, 287 U.S. 435 , which was the first c…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hassett v. Far West Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)
See also Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nickolaou
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
No. 80-655.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.