Sandoval v. Arizona, 449 U.S. 880 (1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Sandoval v. Arizona, 449 U.S. 880 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “neither a pretrial detainee nor a parole violator has a sufficient interest in the rehabilitation programs of his confining institution to justify invocation of the Act”
103 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 39 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dunaway v. Commonwealth (ky, 2001-11-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Dunaway v. Commonwealth
Ky. · 2001 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
neither a pretrial detainee nor a parole violator has a sufficient interest in the rehabilitation programs of his confining institution to justify invocation of the act
discussed Cited "see" State v. Calloway
La. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law, § 8.10, p. 430 (West 1986) ("The circumstance that the buyer paid an inadequate price for the goods, that the seller was irresponsible, that the transaction between them was secret-these factors all point toward . . . guilty knowledge."); see United States v. Prazak, 623 F.2d 152, 154-55 (10th Cir.1980) [cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880 , 101 S.Ct. 229 , 66 L.Ed.2d 104 (1980)] ("Acquisition of recently stolen property at a ridiculously low price from an unknown person is itself sufficient to support an inference that the one acquiring the property knew the prop…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Johnny R. Padilla
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reed, 620 F.2d 709, 711 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880 (1980).
cited Cited "see" Kinkead v. Union National Bank
Ark. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Winkle v. Grand Nat’l Bank, 267 Ark. 123 , 601 S.W.2d 559 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Collins
E.D.N.Y · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reed, 620 F.2d 709, 711 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880 , 101 S.Ct. 229 , 66 L.Ed.2d 104 (1980); United States v. Dobson, 585 F.2d 55, 58 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 899 , 99 S.Ct. 264 , 58 L.Ed.2d 247 (1978); United States v. Roy, 597 F.Supp. 1210, 1215 (D.Conn.1984) (noting that until the revocation of parole, for purposes of the IAD a defendant’s status is that of a pretrial detainee), aff'd, 771 F.2d 54 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1110 , 106 S.Ct. 1520 , 89 L.Ed.2d 918 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Holsey
10th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Prazak, 623 F.2d 152, 154 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880 , 101 S.Ct. 229 , 66 L.Ed.2d 104 (1980) (A trial court need not instruct on a defendant’s theory of defense where there is no support therefor in the evidence.).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Holsey
10th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Prazak, 623 F.2d 152, 154 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880 , 101 S.Ct. 229 , 66 L.Ed.2d 104 (1980) (A trial court need not instruct on a defendant's theory of defense where there is no support therefor in the evidence.).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lawrence A. Saffeels
8th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reed, 620 F.2d 709, 711-12 (9th Cir.) (holding that pending parole revocation does not constitute a “term of imprisonment” under the IAD), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880 , 101 S.Ct. 229 , 66 L.Ed.2d 104 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Douglas Keith Krohne v. Kurt S. Peterson
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Reed, 620 F.2d 709, 711 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880 (1980) (stating that notation "hold for U.S. Marshals" could, in certain circumstances, constitute a detainer under the IAD).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Meyer (2×)
Or. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
Under the federal cases, a trial court has discretion to deny severance if "the evidence is sufficiently `simple and distinct' to mitigate the dangers otherwise created by such a joinder," as well as if "evidence of the joined offenses would be mutually admissible in separate trials." United States v. Werner, supra, 620 F.2d at 927 ( quoting United States v. Halper, 590 F.2d 422 (2d Cir.1978)); see also United States v. Reed, 620 F.2d 709, 712 (9th Cir.), cert. den. 449 U.S. 880 , 101 S.Ct. 229 , 66 L.Ed.2d 104 (1980); Drew v. United States, 331 F.2d 85, 91-92 (D.C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Goodson v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
Esola v. Groomes, 520 F.2d 830, 836-37 (3d Cir.1975)." United States v. Reed, 620 F.2d 709, 711 (9th Cir.1980); see also Annot. 98 A.L.R.3d 160 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880 , 101 S.Ct. 229 , 66 L.Ed.2d 104 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. MacHia (2×)
Vt. · 1990 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Illinois, 619 F.2d 668, 671-73 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 880 (1980) (defendant’s presence in court presumed though not explicit in record); Williams v. United States, 332 F.2d 36, 39 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 976 (1965) (express stipulation not required where defendant was present when counsel orally agreed to stipulation in open court); Horne v. United States, 264 F.2d 40, 41, 43 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 934 (1959) (same); State v. Ciniglio, 57 N.J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sandoval
v.
Arizona
No. 80-5081.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
449 U.S. 880
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 59%
Citer courts: Kentucky Supreme Court (1)

Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.