green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
14.0 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases ·
"An EIS is not required, however, when the proposed federal action will effect no change in the status quo"
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Improper joinder under Rule 8 requires mandatory severance.”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 46 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Sylvia HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHELBY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
But see Burwell v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 633 F.2d 361, 371 (4th Cir. 1980) (en banc) (concurring opinion), cert, denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1480 , 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sherman v. Community Consolidated School District 21
(2×)
references to the deity in our ceremonies and our coinage and seals do not violate the establishment clause because they merely reflect this fact of our history and no longer have any potentially entangling theological significance.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Kent Thomas L'ALLier
improper joinder under rule 8 requires mandatory severance.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Manasota-88, Inc. v. Thomas
an eis is not required, however, when the proposed federal action will effect no change in the status quo
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Manasota-88, Inc. v. Thomas
an eis is not required, however, when the proposed federal action will effect no change in the status quo
discussed
Cited "see"
Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta
(2×)
See Burwell v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 633 F.2d 361, 365-66 (4th Cir.1980) (plurality opinion), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1480 , 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981); see also Harriss v. Pan Am.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta
(2×)
See Burwell v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 633 F.2d 361, 365-66 (4th Cir.1980) (plurality opinion), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1480 , 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981); see also Harriss v. Pan Am.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrews
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1200 (7th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca11 1989
(2×)
See Hall v. Bradshaw, 630 F.2d 1018, 1021 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1480 , 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jager v. Douglas County School District
(2×)
See Hall v. Bradshaw, 630 F.2d 1018, 1021 (4th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1480 , 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Oliver Hocking
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1193 (7th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); Boulahanis, 677 F.2d at 589-90 .
discussed
Cited "see"
ca7 1988
(2×)
See United States v. Armored Transport, Inc., 629 F.2d 1313, 1316 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Macklin, 523 F.2d 193, 195 (2d Cir.1975); United States v. Fein, 504 F.2d 1170, 1173 (2d Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
(2×)
See United States v. Armored Transport, Inc., 629 F.2d 1313, 1316 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Macklin, 523 F.2d 193, 195 (2d Cir.1975); United States v. Fein, 504 F.2d 1170, 1173 (2d Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Holcomb
(2×)
See United States v. Basso, 632 F.2d 1007 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1480 , 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981); United States v. Sutton, 607 F.2d 220 (8th Cir.1979); Collins v. Turner, 599 F.2d 657 (5th Cir.1979); Lambur v. Chew, 356 F.Supp. 751 (E.D.Va.1973); People v. Gladdis, 77 Mich.App. 91 , 257 N.W.2d 749 *459 (1977); Pearson v. State, 308 Minn. 287 , 241 N.W.2d 490 (1976); Ewing v. Wyrick, 535 S.W.2d 442 (Mo.1976); State v. Ellefson, 334 N.W.2d 56 (S.D.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Lawrence Peters, and Jacek Odoner
(2×)
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1200 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Shue, 766 F.2d 1122, 1135 (7th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fitapelli
See, United States v. Armored Transport Inc., 629 F.2d 1313, 1318-19 (9th Cir.1980) cert. denied 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981) (upholding conviction by construing defective indictment as an information).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fitapelli
See, United States v. Armored Transport Inc., 629 F.2d 1313, 1318-19 (9th Cir.1980) cert. denied 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981) (upholding conviction by construing defective indictment as an information).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ira Paul Citron
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1196 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fischbach And Moore, Inc.
See United States v. Armored Transport, 629 F.2d 1313, 1317 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352 , 359-60 n. 17 (9th Cir.1975) ("grand jury convened and sitting in the Central District of California"), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.
See United States v. Armored Transport, 629 F.2d 1313, 1317 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352 , 359-60 n. 17 (9th Cir.1975) (“grand jury convened and sitting in the Central District of California”), ce rt. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, Paul L. Wright, and James B. Plank
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1197-98 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marrapese
See United States v. Armored Transport, Inc., 629 F.2d 1313, 1316-17 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. State
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1198 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Medical Therapy Sciences, Inc., 583 F.2d 36, 39-40 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1130 , 99 S.Ct. 1049 , 59 L.Ed.2d 91 (1979); Sneed v. State, 397 So.2d 931, 933 (Fla. 5 D.C.A. 1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Norman Z. Flick and Lowell G. Maynard, United States of America v. Norman Z. Flick and Lowell G. Maynard
See United States v. Hedman, 680 F.2d 1184, 1200 (7th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent Albano
(2×)
See United States v. Basso, 632 F.2d 1007 , 1012 n. 5 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1480 , 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981); Nicholas v. United States, 527 F.2d 1160 (9th Cir.1976); United States v. Swanson, 454 F.2d 1263, 1265 (7th Cir.1972); United States v. Fontana, 510 F.Supp. 158, 160 (W.D.Pa.), aff’d, 673 F.2d 1303 (1981); United States v. Miller, 454 F.Supp. 440, 422 (N.D.Ill.1978).
examined
Cited "see"
ca4 1982
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accordingly, the general view when these defenses have been raised by employers has been that they must be rejected because "it is the purpose of Title VII to allow the individual woman to make [the] choice for herself." Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. at 335 , 97 S.Ct. at 2729 (b.f.o.q. defense); see Burwell v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 633 F.2d 361, 371 (4th Cir.1980) (en banc) (business necessity defense), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1480 , 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981). 61 The same overriding consideration does not, of course, apply to the safety of others than the women workers themselve…
examined
Cited "see"
Wright v. Olin Corp.
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accordingly, the general view when these defenses have been raised by employers has been that they must be rejected because “it is the purpose of Title VII to allow the individual woman to make [the] choice for herself.” Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. at 335 , 97 S.Ct. at 2729 (b.f.o.q. defense); see Burwell v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 633 F.2d 361, 371 (4th Cir.1980) (en banc) (business necessity defense), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1480 , 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1982
(2×)
See generally Burwell v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 633 F.2d 361, 371 (4th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1480 , 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981); In re Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings, 582 F.2d 1142 , 1145 (7th Cir.1978), cert. granted sub nom., TWA v. Zipes, 450 U.S. 979 , 101 S.Ct. 1511 , 67 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981) ("no motherhood" policy for female flight attendants constitutes sex discrimination); Sprogis v. United Airlines, Inc., 444 F.2d 1194, 1198 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 991 , 92 S.Ct. 536 , 30 L.Ed.2d 543 (1971) (prohibiting women flight attendants from marryin…
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerdom v. Continental Airlines, Inc.
(2×)
See generally Burwell v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 633 F.2d 361, 371 (4th Cir.1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1480 , 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981); In re Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings, 582 F.2d 1142 , 1145 (7th Cir.1978), cert. granted sub nom., TWA v. Zipes, 450 U.S. 979 , 101 S.Ct. 1511 , 67 L.Ed.2d 813 (1981) (“no motherhood” policy for female flight attendants constitutes sex discrimination); Sprogis v. United Airlines, Inc., 444 F.2d 1194, 1198 (7th' CHr.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 991 , 92 S.Ct. 536 , 30 L.Ed.2d 543 (1971) (prohibiting women flight attendants from ma…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph M. Margiotta
(2×)
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184 , 1194 n.4 (7th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bauer Welding and Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
See South Shore Hospital v. NLRB, 630 F.2d 40, 44 (1st Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); Neon Sign Corp. v. NLRB, 602 F.2d 1203, 1204-05 (5th Cir. 1979); NLRB v. Amoco Chemicals Corp., 529 F.2d 427, 432-33 (5th Cir. 1976); NLRB v. Dent, 534 F.2d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Osborne
See United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184 (7th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Warner, 441 F.2d 821 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 829 , 92 S.Ct. 65 , 30 L.Ed.2d 58 (1971); United States v. Varelli, 407 F.2d 735 (7th Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donnelly v. Lynch
(2×)
See Hall v. Bradshaw, 630 F.2d 1018 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1480 , 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981) (prayer, scenic photos, and message from governor on reverse side of official highway map).
cited
Cited "see"
Barbara S. Clanton v. Orleans Parish School Board
See Burwell v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 633 F.2d 361, 372-73 (4th Cir. 1980) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1480 , 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981). 18 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Thompson
See, e.g., United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1196 (7th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilderness Society v. Babbitt
If it had, it would have needed to explain our decisions in which we have held that the government need not prepare an EIS for ongoing programs unless they “rise to the level of major federal actions .... ” Upper Snake River Chapter of Trout Unlimited v. Hodel, 921 F.2d 232 , 236 n. 3 (9th Cir.1990) (periodic adjustments of water flow are part of ongoing operation of dam); see also Burbank Anti-Noise Group v. Goldschmidt, 623 F.2d 115, 116 (9th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981) (holding that an EIS is not required when “the proposed federal a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Wilderness Society v. Babbitt
If it had, it would have needed to explain our decisions in which we have held that the government need not prepare an EIS for ongoing programs unless they "rise to the level of major federal actions...." Upper Snake River Chapter of Trout Unlimited v. Hodel, 921 F.2d 232 , 235 n. 3 (9th Cir.1990) (periodic adjustments of water flow are part of ongoing operation of dam); see also Burbank Anti-Noise Group v. Goldschmidt, 623 F.2d 115, 116 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981) (holding that an EIS is not required when "the proposed federal action wil…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sims
See also United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1200 (7th Cir.1980) (rejecting defendant's claim that since he was charged in only two of the nineteen counts in the indictment, he was prejudiced by the disparity of the evidence against him and the evidence against his co-defendants), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Environmental Rights Coalition, Inc. v. Austin
See, e.g., Burbank Anti-Noise Group v. Goldschmidt, 623 F.2d 115, 116 (9th Cir.1980) (“the actions here can be undone"), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); Silva, 473 F.2d at 290 (”[t]he nexus here ... is so extensive”). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tomas Perez and Raul Ramirez
See, e.g., United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1201 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Gonzales, 765 F.2d 1393, 1396 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1068 , 106 S.Ct. 826 , 88 L.Ed.2d 798 *1275 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca3 1986
See, e.g., United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1194 (7th Cir.1980) (extortion found although victim "happy" to make payments and relations between victim and extorters was "cordial"), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Sander, 615 F.2d 215 (5th Cir.) (Hobbs Act covers fear of economic loss and "subtle extortions"; government need not show that fear was direct consequence of threat or that victim personally feared extorter), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980). 67 Here, of course, the extortion of rights which …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Local 560 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers of America
See, e.g., United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1194 (7th Cir.1980) (extortion found although victim “happy” to make payments and relations between victim and extorters was “cordial”), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Sander, 615 F.2d 215 (5th Cir.) (Hobbs Act covers fear of economic loss and “subtle extortions”; government need not show that fear was direct consequence of threat or that victim personally feared extorter), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henry Paul Bryant, A/K/A Paul Bryant and Melissa J. Dalton
As the Third Circuit has stated: A violation of the statute [ 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (b)(2) ] may be made out by showing that a public official through the wrongful use of office obtains property not due him or his office, even though his acts are not accompanied by the use of “force, violence or fear.” United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 594 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982), quoting United States v. Mazzei, 521 F.2d 639, 645 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1014 , 96 S.Ct. 446 , 46 L.Ed.2d 385 (1975); see also United States v. Hed…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Shue
See United States v. Rodgers, 732 F.2d 625, 628 (8th Cir.1984); United States v. Werner, 620 F.2d 922, 926 (2d Cir.1980); see also United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1200 (7th Cir.1980) (“Improper joinder under Rule 8 requires mandatory severance.”), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hyman Schmidt, Marvin Gene Grulke, Chester Folak
See, e.g., United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981); United States v. Price, 617 F.2d 455, 457 (7th Cir.1979); United States v. Braasch, 505 F.2d 139, 151 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 910 , 95 S.Ct. 1561 , 43 L.Ed.2d 775 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rita ZUNIGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KLEBERG COUNTY HOSPITAL, KINGSVILLE, TEXAS, Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
See also Burwell v. Eastern Air Lines, 633 F.2d 361, 369 (4th Cir.1980) (per curiam), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1480 , 67 L.Ed.2d 613 (1981). 8 .
Bradshaw, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Transportation
v.
Hall
v.
Hall
No. 80-746.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 2, 1981.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.