discussed Cited "see, e.g." Utah Power & Light Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission See, e.g., Consolidated Rail Corp. v. ICC, 646 F.2d 642 , 647 & n. 12 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1047 , 102 S.Ct. 587 , 70 L.Ed.2d 488 (1981). 61 The scope of our review of the ICC's decisions under its Staggers Act section 11501(c) jurisdiction is defined by the above-stated standards.

cited Cited "see, e.g." Utah Power & Light Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission See, e.g., Consolidated Rail Corp. v. ICC, 646 F.2d 642 , 647 & n. 12 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1047 , 102 S.Ct. 587 , 70 L.Ed.2d 488 (1981).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Burlington Northern Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission See also Consolidated Rail Corp. v. ICC, 646 F.2d 642 , 644 n.5 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1047 , 102 S.Ct. 587 , 70 L.Ed.2d 488 (1981) 6 See Public Utilities Comm'n of California v. United States, 355 U.S. 534 , 543 n.10, 78 S.Ct. 446 , 452 n.10, 2 L.Ed.2d 470 (1958); Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R.

cited Cited "see, e.g." Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Interstate Commerce Commission See also Consolidated Rail Corp. v. ICC, 646 F.2d 642 , 644 n.5 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1047 , 102 S.Ct. 587 , 70 L.Ed.2d 488 (1981). .