green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
I, § 7, cl. 3, supra, at 945-946, was added. 2 Farrand 304-305.
cited
Cited "see"
Jose Santos v. State of NJ
See Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 812 , 325, 102 S.Ct. 445 , 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Majid Ghorbani v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See 454 U.S. 812 , 102 S.Ct. 87 , 70 L.Ed.2d 80 (1981) (ordering parties to address the jurisdictional issue at oral argument).
discussed
Cited "see"
Consumer Energy Council of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Chadha v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 634 F.2d 408 , 417 & n.5 (9th Cir. 1980), consideration of juris. postponed until hearing on merits, 454 U.S. 812 , 102 S.Ct. 87 , 70 L.Ed.2d 80 (1981). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Congressional Disapproval of AWACS Arms Sale
See Chadha v. Immigration an d Naturalization Service, 634 F.2d 408, 421-35 (9th Cir. 1980), cert, granted and jurisdiction postponed, 454 U.S. 812 (1981).* Second, and equally fundamental, § 36(b) impermissibly intrudes on the President’s authority to execute the laws and to conduct the Na tion’s foreign relations, in violation of the principle of separation of powers.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
F. W. Woolworth Co.
v.
Taxation and Revenue Department of New Mexico
v.
Taxation and Revenue Department of New Mexico
No. 80-1745.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. N. M. Probable jurisdiction noted and case set for oral argument in tandem with No. 80-2015, ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commission, immediately infra.