Escariz v. Barahal, 454 U.S. 824 (1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Escariz v. Barahal, 454 U.S. 824 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “The principal purpose of that [average] agreement was to spread demur-rage liabilities over all shipments, rather than calculate them solely on an individualized per car basis.”
38 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission (ca7, 1982-08-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
7th Cir. · 1982 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the principal purpose of that agreement was to spread demur-rage liabilities over all shipments, rather than calculate them solely on an individualized per car basis.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Pa. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Pennsylvania PUC v. Pennsylvania Gas and Water Co., 492 Pa. 326 , 424 A.2d 1213 (1980), cert. denied 454 U.S. 824 , 102 S.Ct. 112 , 70 L.Ed.2d 97 (1981), later proceeding Pennsylvania Gas and Water Co. v. Pennsylvania PUC, 79 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 416 , 470 A.2d 1066 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Escariz
v.
Barahal
No. 80-1905.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
454 U.S. 824
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.