green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
11.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ivie Clay, a Minor v. Director, Juvenile Division, Department of Corrections
(2×)
But see Crick v. Smith, 650 F.2d 860, 867-68 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); Boyer v. Patton, 579 F.2d 284, 286 (3d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Harlow v. State
See Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79 (1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); Jones v. State, Wyo., 580 P.2d 1150 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Hodgins v. State
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79, 166 (Wyo.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Canady
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79, 130 (Wyo.1981) (“[a] party may not merely have hearsay admitted under [the state of mind exception] in order to circumvent the [hearsay] rule”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Agundis
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 792 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (letter addressed to all four defendants by name and referring to a boat, offered for purpose of linking the defendants with one another and to the vessel, was not hearsay); United States v. Canieso, 470 F.2d 1224, 1232 (2d Cir.1972) (letter found in co-defendant’s wallet, which was similar to letter found on defendant, was not hearsay when offered not as proof of statements therein but only as circumstantial evidence that the two defendants were linked).
discussed
Cited "see"
Engberg v. Meyer
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79 (Wyo. 1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of Wyoming
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79, 97 (Wyo.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982) (Hopkinson I).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of Wyoming
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79 (Wyo.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982) (Hopkinson I).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Epifanio Sanchez-Lopez Brijido Astorga-Ayon, United States of America v. Antonio Martinez-Ortega, United States of America v. Guillermo Sanchez-Lopez
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 792 (5th Cir.1981) (letter addressed to individuals charged with a conspiracy which was found on a vessel containing contraband was not admitted for its truth, but was relevant evidence admitted for the limited purpose of linking the individuals to the vessel and to each other), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Lopez, 584 F.2d 1175, 1179 (2d Cir.1978) (taped conversation between two persons was not admitted for its truth, but was relevant evidence to show that the two individuals knew each other).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sanchez-Lopez
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 792 (5th Cir.1981) (letter addressed to individuals charged with a conspiracy which was found on a vessel containing contraband was not admitted for its truth, but was relevant evidence admitted for the limited purpose of linking the individuals to the vessel and to each other), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Lopez, 584 F.2d 1175, 1179 (2d Cir.1978) (taped conversation between two persons was not admitted for its truth, but was relevant evidence to show that the two individuals knew each other).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Finley
See United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 1025 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gabriel Alvarez, Gustavo Holguin, Leovigilda Rivera, Humberto Olivares Castrellon and Oneyda Zambrana
(2×)
Faurote, 749 F.2d at 43 ; see United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 322 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Blakey, 607 F.2d 779, 787 (7th Cir.1979). a. true and accurate recordings The government presented clear and convincing evidence to show that the conversations were recorded truly and accurately.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Finley
See United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kevin Winston Osborn v. Duane Shillinger, Warden of the Wyoming State Penitentiary A.G. McClintock the Attorney General of the State of Wyoming
Following this rationale, we have consistently held with respect to direct appeals that until the Supreme Court overrules Fay , “we shall apply the rule of that ease at least to situations in which no state appeal has been taken.” Holcomb v. Murphy, 701 F.2d 1307, 1310 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 3546 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1983); see Worthen v. Meachum, 842 F.2d 1179, 1181 (10th Cir.1988); accord Crick v. Smith, 650 F.2d 860, 867 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); Boyer v. Patton, 579 F.2d 284, 286 (3d Cir.1978). 11 Our ow…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cutbirth v. State
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79 (1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); Jones v. State, Wyo., 580 P.2d 1150 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haselhuhn v. State
(2×)
See Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Strickland v. Marshall
Chief Justice Burger’s concurring opinion in Sykes indicates that this standard has continuing applicability where the default is the result of a decision made by the defendant himself. 433 U.S. at 92 , 97 S.Ct. at 2509 ; accord, Crick v. Smith, 650 F.2d 860, 863 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Bounds
(2×)
Nothing less than a specific intent to kill must be found before a defendant can be convicted of attempt to commit murder, and the instructions in this respect should be lean and unequivocal in explaining to the jury that only a specific intent to kill will do.” (People v. Santascoy (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 909, 918 [ 200 Cal.Rptr. 709 ]; accord People v. Murtishaw (1981) 29 Cal.3d 733, 762-764 [ 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 ], cert. den. (1982) 455 U.S. 922 [ 71 L.Ed.2d 464 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 ]; People v. Collie (1981) 30 Cal.3d 43, 61-62 [ 177 Cal.Rptr. 458 , 634 P.2d 534 , 23 A.L.R.4th 776…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cesar Tenorio-Angel
See United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 321 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Bower, 575 F.2d 499, 503 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 983 , 99 S.Ct. 572 , 58 L.Ed.2d 654 (1978). 10 As recently stated by the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Aguirre Aguirre, 716 F.2d 293 (5th Cir.1983): Although the confidential informant's privilege no longer exists when the informant is known to the defendant “[t]he need for the informant’s safety, the avoidance of jeopardizing other opera *1511 tions, or the defendant’s …
discussed
Cited "see"
All American Life & Casualty Co. v. Oceanic Trade Alliance Council International, Inc.
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786, 788 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Martinez, 604 F.2d 361, 366 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 708 , 62 L.Ed.2d 671 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
All American Life And Casualty Company v. Oceanic Trade Alliance Council International
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786, 788 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Martinez, 604 F.2d 361, 366 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 708 , 62 L.Ed.2d 671 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Hopkinson v. District Court, Teton County
See Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79 (1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982) [Hopkinson I]; Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 664 P.2d 43 , cert. denied — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 262 , 78 L.Ed.2d 246 (1983) [Hopkinson II]; Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 679 P.2d 1008 , cert. denied — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 228 , 83 L.Ed.2d 157 (1984) [Hopkinson III], Briefly, the facts are that appellant was found guilty of four murders and, as a result of the presence of statutory aggravating circumstances and upon recommendation of a jury, sentenced to death for the murder of Jeff Green.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Lewis Clark, Iii, and George R. Newton, Moody Nichols, Defendants
United States v. Williams, 503 F.2d 50, 53 (6th Cir.1974); see United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Mullins, 638 F.2d 1151, 1152 (8th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul W. Granville
See United States v. Sedigh, 658 F.2d 1010, 1015 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982); cf. United States v. Dorr, 636 F.2d 117, 121 (5th Cir.1981) (in assessing prejudice to defendant from prosecutor’s closing argument, jury instruction may be considered).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rex C. Cauble, Individually and Doing Business as Cauble Enterprises
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(2). 30 .
discussed
Cited "see"
California v. Ramos
(2×)
See People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal. 3d 733, 767-775 , 631 P. 2d 446, 468-471 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U. S. 922 (1982). [5] Farris v. State, 535 S. W. 2d, at 613-614 , quoting Graham v. State, 304 S. W. 2d 622, 624 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Joe Whitten, John Elmer Gaiefsky, Jack Wayne Gish, Richard Lawrence Shimel
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786, 787-89 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982) (evidence of a large number of calls between a narcotics buyer and defendant who was identified as the seller sufficient to establish a violation of § 843(b)); United States v. Cooper, 606 F.2d 96, 98 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1024 , 100 S.Ct. 685 , 62 L.Ed.2d 657 (1980) (testimony that witness sent several money orders and that some of the money used for heroin sufficient to support a conviction on two counts of § 843(b)).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Levino Michelena-Orovio
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See, for example, United States v. Mazyak, 5 Cir. 1981, 650 F.2d 788 , cert. denied, 1982, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 ; United States v. Shelnut, 5 Cir.1980, 625 F.2d 59 , cert. denied, 1981, 450 U.S. 983 , 101 S.Ct. 1520 , 67 L.Ed.2d 818 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ira Eugene Borchardt
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 790-91 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Grayson, 625 F.2d 66, 67 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
John E. Breen, J.D. Malkemus, R.B. Lewis, J.D. Griffin and Jeannie F. Graham v. Centex Corporation
See Rufenacht v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 492 F.Supp. 877 (N.D.Tex.1980), affirmed, 656 F.2d 198 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 ; see also Moore Fed.Pract. ¶ 0.416[2] at 2231 n. 10 and cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David L. Mack
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786, 789 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmy Dale Wood
See, United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 322 (5th Cir.1981), cert. den., 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clark N. Fischel
See United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317, 321 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kingkamau Nantambu
The panel cited the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, stating that “ ‘[t]he fact that [the operator] successfully made the tape recordings [ ] satisfies the competency requirement.’ ” Id. at 511 , 644 A.2d 672 (second alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Franklin, 747 F.2d 497, 498 (8th Cir.1984)); see also United States v. Hughes, 658 F.2d 317 (5th Cir.1981) (holding because “the paramount purpose of the inquiry is to insure the accuracy of the recording^] ... the government’s failure to show the competency of either the operator or the machine was overshadowed…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Albarran v. State
See e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to ‘rap sheets’ of prospectiv…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doster v. State
See e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982)(trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to ‘rap sheets’ of prospective…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phillips v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to “rap sheets” of prospecti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Billups v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to ‘rap sheets’ of prospecti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saunders v. State
See also Palmer v. State, *80 401 So.2d 266, 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).” Jones v. State, [Ms. CR-05-0527, Aug. 31, 2007] — So.3d -, - (Ala.Crim.App.2007), quoting Hubbard v. State, 500 So.2d 1204, 1218 (Ala.Crim.App.), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1231 (Ala.1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. State
See also Palmer v. State, 401 So.2d 266, 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brownfield v. State
See also Palmer v. State, 401 So.2d 266, 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. State
See e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982)(trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for pretrial discovery of state's juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to `rap sheets' of prospective jurors)…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barber v. State
See also Palmer v. State, 401 So.2d 266, 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hocker v. State
See also Palmer v. State , 401 So.2d 266 , 268 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 401 So.2d 270 (Ala. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dorsey v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for pretrial discovery of state's juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990)(defendant is not necessarily entitled to `rap sheets' of prospective jurors…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGriff v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, *982 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for pretrial discovery of state's juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to "rap sheets" of prospective …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGriff v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for pretrial discovery of state’s juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to “rap sheets” of prospecti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick C. David
Id. at 297 ; see also United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 792 (5th Cir.1981) (upholding the admission of a letter challenged as hearsay because it was not used to prove the truth of the contents therein, but rather as circumstantial proof that the appellants were associated with each other), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Canieso, 470 F.2d 1224, 1232 (2d Cir.1972) (describing a letter as non-hearsay because it was used merely as circumstantial proof that the parties were linked).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arthur v. State
See, e.g., People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (trial judge has discretionary authority to permit defense access to jury records); Moon v. State, 258 Ga. 748 , 375 S.E.2d 442 (1988), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 982 , 111 S.Ct. 1638 , 113 L.Ed.2d 733 (1991) (trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for pretrial discovery of state's juror information records); State v. Wiggins, 556 So.2d 622 (La.App.1990) (defendant is not necessarily entitled to `rap sheets' of prospective juror…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keith Daniel Williams v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, San Quentin State Prison
Compare People v. Murtishaw, 29 Cal.3d 733, 773 , 175 Cal.Rptr. 738 , 631 P.2d 446 (1981) (allowing jury under 1977 law to consider evidence not tied to any statutory factor), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982), with Boyd, 38 Cal.3d at 773-74 , 215 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 700 P.2d 782 (reaching opposite conclusion under 1978 law).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leader
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-1165.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1982.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.