green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.0 score
“prison disciplinary proceedings . . . have never been considered part of a criminal prosecution, and the full panoply of rights due a defendant in such proceedings does not apply.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ogunlana v. Hemingway
prison disciplinary proceedings ... have never been considered part of a criminal prosecution, and the full panoply of rights due a defendant in such proceedings does not apply.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
LONG v. WARDEN
prison disciplinary proceedings . . . have never been considered part of a criminal prosecution, and the full panoply of rights due a defendant in such proceedings does not apply.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Foy
See U.S. v. Johnson, 690 F.2d 60, 64 (3rd Cir.1982) (upholding warrants that contain a general authorization to seize “instrumentalities of the commission of the crime of conducting *1230 an illegal gambling business” and noting that “the nature of the crime is such that these instrumentalities are reasonably subject to identification, and the in-premises conduct of such illegal activities would make greater particularity impossible”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed.2d 450 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scarfo
See United States v. Johnson, 690 F.2d 60, 64 (3d Cir.1982) (citing Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 467 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed.2d 450 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gunn v. State
See generally Moody v. State, 418 So.2d 989 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1213 , 75 L.Ed.2d 451 (1983); Essix v. State, 347 So.2d 664 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 357 So.2d 185 (Fla.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Deaner Tab Deaner
See United States v. Herrold, 962 F.2d 1131, 1138 (3d Cir.) (even assuming some factual averments in affidavit are tainted, they do not vitiate warrant otherwise validly issued upon other information in affidavit that establishes probable cause) (quoting United States v. Johnson, 690 F.2d 60, 63 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed.2d 450 (1983)), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 421 , 121 L.Ed.2d 344 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
See United States v. Johnson, 690 F.2d 60, 62-63 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed.2d 450 (1983) 5 Thus, we exercise plenary review over the order of suppression 6 While the proximity of the defendants' homes to the site of the crime tends to support the magistrate judge's determination that there was probable cause for issuance of the warrants, we are not by our citation of Savoca, Green, and Flanagan implying that a long distance between the site of a crime and a suspect's residence necessarily tends to negate an inference that otherwise might be drawn tha…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
See United States v. Johnson, 690 F.2d 60, 62-63 (3d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmy Beaumont, Alvin Paul Brevell, Jr., A/K/A \Junior\"
See United States v. Johnson, 690 F.2d 60, 64-65 (3rd Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed.2d 450 (1983); In re Property Belonging to Talk of the Town Bookstore, Inc., 644 F.2d 1317, 1318-19 (9th Cir. 1981); United States v. Johnson, 541 F.2d 1311, 1315-16 (8th Cir.1976). 13 .
cited
Cited "see"
Moore v. Final Reviewing Authority Bd.
See Caruth v. Pinkney, 683 F.2d 1044, 1052 (7th Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hamilton v. State
See United States v. Johnson, 690 F.2d 60, 64 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed.2d 450 (1983); United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir.1982), cert denied, 464 U.S. 814 , 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 83 (1983); United States v. Brock, 667 F.2d 1311, 1323 (9th Cir.1982); Application of Lafayette Academy, Inc., 610 F.2d 1, 4 (1st Cir.1979); United States v. Johnson, 541 F.2d 1311, 1315 (8th Cir.1976); State v. Santiago, 8 Conn. App. 290 , 513 A.2d 710, 717 (1986); Sadie v. State, 488 So.2d 1368, 1372-74 (Ala.App. 1986); State v. Majors, 430 So.…
cited
Cited "see"
Albert Earle Smith-Bey v. Hospital Administrator
See Caruth v. Pinkney, 683 F.2d 1044, 1048 (7th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed.2d 451 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Santiago
If that description is inadequate, however, it is appropriate to look to the description appearing in the warrant application or affidavit if it is clear that the executing officers were in a position to be aided by these documents, as where they were attached to the warrant at the time of execution and incorporated therein by reference.” (Emphasis in original; footnote omitted.) 2 LaFave, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 4.5, pp. 73-74; see United States v. Johnson, 690 F.2d 60, 64 (3d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S. Ct. 1212 , 75 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Lavado v. State
See Moody v. State, 418 So.2d 989, 993 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1213 , 75 L.Ed.2d 451 (1983); Lewis v. State, 377 So.2d 640, 642-43 (Fla. 1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Bates v. State
See Moody v. State, 418 So.2d 989 (Fla. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1213 , 75 L.Ed.2d 451 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Leon Bates v. J.W. Jean
See Caruth v. Pinkney, 683 F.2d 1044, 1050 (7th Cir.1982), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed.2d 451 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Massachusetts v. Sheppard
See United States v. Johnson, 690 F. 2d 60, 64-65 (CA3 1982), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 1214 (1983); In re Property Belonging to Talk of the Town Bookstore, Inc., 644 F. 2d 1317, 1318-1319 (CA9 1981); United States v. Johnson, 541 F. 2d 1311, 1315-1316 (CA8 1976); United States v. Womack, 166 U. S. App. D.
cited
Cited "see"
Aljoe Poindexter v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Accord Caruth v. Pinkney, 683 F.2d 1044, 1049 (7th Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed.2d 451 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Anthony R. Martin-Trigona. Appeal of Anthony R. Martin-Trigona. Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Harold Lavien, Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. William F. Smith
Sec. 1915 (d); see Caruth v. Pinkney, 683 F.2d 1044, 1048 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed.2d 451 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin-Trigona v. Lavien
In non-criminal cases federal courts have the authority to appoint counsel, but generally they are not required to do so. 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d); see Caruth v. Pinkney, 683 F.2d 1044, 1048 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed.2d 451 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of Iowa
Compare, e. g., Caruth v. Pinkney, 683 F. 2d 1044, 1049 (CA7 1982) (§ 1915(d) does not authorize compulsory appointments), cert denied, 459 U. S. 1214 (1983); United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, 795 F. 2d 796, 801-803 (CA9 1986) (same), with, e. g., Peterson v. Nadler, 452 F. 2d 754, 757 (CA8 1971) (§ 1915(d) permits mandatory assignments); Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F. 2d 160, 163, n. 3 (CA4 1984) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul H. Rauter v. United States
Ellis v. United States, 313 F.2d 848, 850 (7th Cir.1963); McCartney v. United States, 311 F.2d 475, 476 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 848 , 83 S.Ct. 1910 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1068 (1963); see also Caruth v. Pinkney, 683 F.2d 1044, 1048 (7th Cir.1982) (“There is little doubt that there is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in a civil case.”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed.2d 451 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gerardo v. NJ State Parole Bd.
See also Caruth v. Pinkney, 683 F. 2d 1044, 1052 (7th Cir.1982), cert. den. 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed. 2d 451 (1983) (failure of prison officials to comply with 72 hour hearing rule not violative of due process).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cornelius Lewis and Paul S. Erickson v. Michael P. Lane
Compare Caruth v. Pinkney, 683 F.2d 1044, 1049 (7th Cir.1982) (under “28 U.S.C. § 1915-a court has the authority only to request an attorney to represent an indigent, not to require him to do so”) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed.2d 451 (1983) with McKeever v. Israel, 689 F.2d 1315 , 1319 & n. 8 (7th Cir.1982) (Although the distinction between “requesting” and “appointing” was irrelevant in this case, the court noted that “the power of a court to provide counsel under section 1915(d) is commonly referred to as a power to ‘appoint.�…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Schrager
See also United States v. Johnson, 690 F.2d 60 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1214 , 103 S.Ct. 1212 , 75 L.Ed.2d 450 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Johnson
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-5869.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. Indiana (1) · E.D. Michigan (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.