Hasbro Indus., Inc. v. A/S Garonne-Glittre, 464 U.S. 1013 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Hasbro Indus., Inc. v. A/S Garonne-Glittre, 464 U.S. 1013 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
108 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 30 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Reade-Alvarez v. Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C.
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Reade-Alvarez v. Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C.
unknown court · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Washington v. New York City Bd. of Estimate, 709 F.2d 792, 796-97 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 537 , 78 L.Ed.2d 717 (1983). 2 II.
cited Cited "see" Trombley v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
D.N.H. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Western Electric Co., 569 F.Supp. 1057, 1094 (D.D.C.), aff'd sub now., California v. United States, 464 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 542 , 78 L.Ed.2d 719 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Byrd v. City of New York
S.D.N.Y. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Washington v. New York City Bd. of Estimate, 709 F.2d 792, 795, 798 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 537 , 78 L.Ed.2d 717 (1983) (denying untimely application for a jury trial to a pro se plaintiff).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc.
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Washington v. New York City Bd. of Estimate, 709 F.2d 792 (2d Cir.1983) (employee’s failure to file request for jury trial within deadline waived employee’s right to jury trial), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 537 , 78 L.Ed.2d 717 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Tyrone Wright v. Thomas Lewis, Corrections Officer, Glenn Bearor and Jeffrey Hughes
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Washington v. New York City Bd. of Estimate, 709 F.2d 792, 799 (2d Cir.) (Oakes, J. dissenting) (“[I]t is a very simple matter ... for the pro se claimant to be provided with the information necessary to claim or waive jury trial.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 537 , 78 L.Ed.2d 717 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Smith v. Local Union 28 Sheet Metal Workers
S.D.N.Y. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Washington v. New York City Board of Estimate, 709 F.2d 792 , 795 n. 3 (2d Cir.) (applying deferential standard to discrimination claims), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 537 , 78 L.Ed.2d 717 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Jolivet v. Deland
10th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 39(b). 9 Jolivet did not file any motion pursuant to Rule 39(b). 26 The fact that Jolivet is proceeding pro se does not entitle him to special consideration under Rule 38. 10 See Washington v. New York City Bd. of Estimate, 709 F.2d 792, 798 (2d Cir.) ("rule of waiver has been applied to pro se litigants"), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 537 , 78 L.Ed.2d 717 (1983); see also Scharnhorst v. Independent Sch.
discussed Cited "see" Thomas Knight A/k/a, Askari Abdullah Muhammad v. Richard L. Dugger and Tom Barton (2×)
11th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Muhammad v. State, 426 So.2d 533, 538 (1982), reh. den’d, 426 So.2d 533 (1983), cert. denied., [ 464 U.S. 865 , 78 L.Ed.2d 174 ] 104 S.Ct. 199 reh. denied, [ 464 U.S. 1013 , 78 L.Ed.2d 718 ] 104 S.Ct. 539 (1983).
cited Cited "see" State ex rel. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service Commission
Mo. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Western Electric Co., Inc., 569 F.Supp. 1057 (D.D.C. 1983), summarily aff'd, California v. United States, 464 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 542 , 78 L.Ed.2d 719 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Grabis v. Navient Solutions, LLC
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
Lucero v. Somichi Deli, Inc., No. 15-cv-413 (PKC), 2016 WL 796853 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (finding that defendants did not make a timely jury demand where “the last pleading directed to the issue” was on October 21, 2015, “meaning that the 14-day window to make a timely jury demand expired on November 4, 2015” rendering the defendants jury demand on November 25, 2015 untimely); see also Washington v. New York City Bd. of Estimate, 709 F.2d 792, 797-98 (2d Cir. 1983) (finding that employee’s request for a jury trial on his age discrimination claim was waived as untimely under Rule 38(…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Western Electric Co.
D.D.C. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, United States v. Western Electric Co., 569 F.Supp. 1057 , 1062 n. 5 (D.D.C.1983), aff’d, California v. United States, 464 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 542 , 78 L.Ed.2d 719 (1983); Department of Justice Competitive Impact Statement, 47 Fed.Reg. 7170, 7174, 7175 (February 17, 1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hasbro Industries, Inc.
v.
A/S Garonne-Glittre
No. 83-629.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1983.
464 U.S. 1013
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 58 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.