green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1986 ·
…the scope of the government contractor rule should be drawn somewhat ... broadly
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 45 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Federal Trade Commission v. Charles F. Monahan
But cf First American Title Co. v. South Dakota Land Title Association, 714 F.2d 1439 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1042 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Crossan v. Electron Tube Division, A Division of Litton Systems, Inc.
the scope of the government contractor rule should be drawn somewhat ... broadly
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Crossan v. ELECTRON TUBE DIV.
the scope of the government contractor rule should be drawn somewhat ... broadly
discussed
Cited "see"
Primes v. Reno
(2×)
See Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 541 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1042 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Novo Nordisk A/S v. Becton Dickinson & Co.
(2×)
See Environmental Designs, Ltd. v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., 713 F.2d 693, 698 (Fed.Cir.1983) (“Virtually all inventions are combinations and virtually all are combinations of old elements.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.
(2×)
See Environmental Designs, Ltd. v. Union Oil Co., 713 F.2d 693, 699 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Snell v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.
See McKay v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 704 F.2d 444 , 453 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 711 , 79 L.Ed.2d 175 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Snell v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.
See McKay v. Rockwell Int'l Corp., 704 F.2d 444 , 453 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 711 , 79 L.Ed.2d 175 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hercules, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
See McKay v. Rockwell International Corp., 704 F. 2d 444, 448-451 (CA9 1983), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 1043 (1984); Brown v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 696 F. 2d 246, 249-254 (CA3 1982); Tillett v. J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Communications Workers of America Lyle Wingate v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company American Telephone and Telegraph Pension Plan
See Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 543, 547 (D.C.Cir.1983) (rejecting futility argument that was based on agency action taken well after plaintiffs had filed suit in district court), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1042 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Bradley C. Carlson
(2×)
See Environmental Designs, Ltd. v. Union Oil Co., 713 F.2d 693, 695 , 218 USPQ 865, 867 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 , 224 USPQ 520 (1984); In re Zimmer, 387 F.2d 990, 991 , 156 USPQ 252 , 253, 55 C.C.P.A. 817 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Grumman Corp.
See In Re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases, 960 F.2d 806 (9th Cir.1992) (defense limited to cases involving complex and sensitive military decisions and not applicable to products readily available on the commercial market) (citing McKay v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 704 F.2d 444 , 451 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 711 , 79 L.Ed.2d 175 (1984) (military contractor defense does not apply to “an ordinary consumer product purchased by the armed forces”)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mitra Koohi Iman Koohi, Minor Daughter Kosar Koohi, Minor Daughter Hassan Almassi Iran Air Flight 655 v. United States of America United States Department of Navy, Elizabeth H. Bailey, as the Personal Representative v. Varian Associates, Inc. General Electric Co. Ge Aerospace Rca Corp Harnischfeger Industries Syscon Corp. Computer Sciences Corporation John Connor
See McKay v. Rockwell Int'l Corp., 704 F.2d 444 (9th Cir.1983) (holding that the discretionary function exception to the FTCA preempts an action against defense contractors brought under the Death on the High Seas Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 761 et seq.) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 711 , 79 L.Ed.2d 175 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Koohi v. United States
See McKay v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 704 F.2d 444 (9th Cir.1983) (holding that the discretionary function exception to the FTCA preempts an action against defense contractors brought under the Death on the High Seas Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 761 et seq.) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 711 , 79 L.Ed.2d 175 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
DataCard Corp. v. KUNZ KG
(2×)
See 713 F.2d 693, 699 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984) (remarks made to a patent examiner to overcome a § 112 rejection, as opposed to a § 103 rejection based on prior art, do not limit the terms of a broad claim); Defs.’ Rep. at 3-5.
cited
Cited "see"
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Murchison
See Fontana v. Barham, 707 F.2d 221, 225-27 (5th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 711 , 79 L.Ed.2d 175 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. Clint W. Murchison, Iii
See Fontana v. Barham, 707 F.2d 221, 225-27 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 711 , 79 L.Ed.2d 175 (1984). 18 The Trusts based their claim on Arnold v. National County Mut.
cited
Cited "see"
Janczewski v. Secretary, Smithsonian Institution
See Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 544 (D.C.Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 1042 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Saunders v. Stone
See id. (quoting Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 544 (D.C.Cir.1983), cer t. denied, 464 U.S. 1042 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984)).
cited
Cited "see"
McGuire v. United States Postal Service
See Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 544 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1042 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard A. Banks v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary of the Navy
See Boyd v. Secretary of Navy, 709 F.2d 684, 687 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 (1984) (The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Intra Corporation and Eagle Technologies, Inc. v. Hamar Laser Instruments, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Appellant
See Environmental Designs, Ltd. v. Union Oil Co., 713 F.2d 693, 698 , 218 USPQ 865, 870 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ecolochem, Inc. v. Mobile Water Technology Co.
(2×)
See Environmental Designs, Ltd. v. Union Oil Co. of California, 713 F.2d 693, 698 (Fed.Cir.1983) (“Virtually all inventions are combinations and virtually all combinations are of old elements”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles E. Wagner v. Reese H. Taylor, Jr., Chairman, Interstate Commerce Commission
See Kizas v. Webster, 227 U.S.App.D.C. 327, 345 , 707 F.2d 524, 542 (1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1042 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984); Lawrence v. Staats, 214 U.S.App.D.C. 438, 441 , 665 F.2d 1256, 1259 (1981); Torre v. Barry, 213 U.S.App.D.C. 147, 150 , 661 F.2d 1371, 1374 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Buildex Inc. v. Kason Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See Environmental Designs, Ltd. v. Union Oil Co. of California, 713 F.2d 693 , 699 n. 9 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Football League v. National Football League
(2×)
See Fairdale Farms, Inc. v. Yankee Milk, Inc., 715 F.2d 30, 33-34 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 711 , 79 L.Ed.2d 174 (1984) (refusal of dairy farm cooperative to sell to dairy products producer with other available sources of supply cannot be considered an “unlawful use of lawfully required monopoly power”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sherman College of Straight Chiropractic v. American Chiropractic Ass'n
See First American Title Company v. South Dakota Land Title Association, 714 F.2d 1439, 1446 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1042 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984); Westborough Mall, Inc. v. City of Cape Girardeau, 693 F.2d 733, 746 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 2122 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1303 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Erik Unt v. The Aerospace Corporation, United States Air Force, Space and Missile Systems Organization, and Air Force Systems Command
(2×)
See Boyd v. Secretary of the Navy, 709 F.2d 684, 686 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Harry H. Zucker v. The United States
See Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 539 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1042 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shelcore, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durham Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant
See American Photocopy Equipment Co. v. Rovico, Inc., 384 F.2d 813, 815-16 , 155 USPQ 119 , 120 (7th Cir.1967), cert, denied, 390 U.S. 945 , 88 S.Ct. 1030 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1133 (1968) (infringer has burden of demonstrating that there is a material distinction between his case and the prior case holding the patent 'valid').’’ See also Environmental Designs, Ltd. v. Union Oil Co., 713 F.2d 693 , 699 n. 9, 218 USPQ 865 , 871 n. 9 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert, denied, 464 U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hybud Equipment Corp. v. City of Akron, Ohio
(2×)
Accord First American Title Co. v. South Dakota Land Title Ass'n, 714 F.2d 1439 , 1454 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hohri v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 539 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Standard Oil Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.
See Environmental Designs, Ltd. v. Union Oil Co., of Cal., 713 F.2d 693, 695 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bricklayers Union Local 21 v. Edgar
See also Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1042 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richland-Lexington Airport District v. Atlas Properties, Inc.
Prior to Boyle , the courts concluded that the Feres-Stencel doctrine was the genesis of the government contractor defense; See, e.g., McKay v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 704 F.2d 444 , 449 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 711 , 79 L.Ed.2d 175 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bentzlin v. Hughes Aircraft Co.
Compare Mitchell v. Lone Star Ammunition, Inc., 913 F.2d 242, 246 (5th Cir.1990) (citations omitted) (" ‘[Fjederal law provides no defense to the military contractor that mismanufactures military equipment or that is itself ultimately responsible for the design defect.' ”) and McKay v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 704 F.2d 444 , 451 (9th Cir.1983) (in dictum, noting that the government contractor defense does not relieve suppliers of military equipment of liability for defects in the manufacture of that equipment), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 711 , 79 L.Ed.2d 175 (1984) with Harduve…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mary Carley v. Wheeled Coach
(2×)
If the system is working as it should, Government contractors will design equipment to avoid certain injuries (like the deaths of soldiers or Government employees) which would be certain to burden the Government. 487 U.S. at 530 , 108 S. Ct. at 2528 (Brennan, J., dissenting); see also McKay v. Rockwell Int'l Corp., 704 F.2d 444 , 457 (9th Cir. 1983) (Alarcon, J., dissenting) (contractors with better safety records will secure less expensive liability insurance and will pass those savings, as well as the benefits of greater safety, on to the government), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S. Ct.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bd. of Educ. of Clifton v. WR Grace
See also McKay v. Rockwell International Corp., 704 F. 2d 444, 450 (9th Cir. 1983), cert. den., 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 711 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 175 (1984) (when only minimal or very general requirements are set forth by the United States contract, the government contractor defense is inapplicable). [ 211 N.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Consolidated United States Atmospheric Testing Litigation, Christina Konizeski v. Livermore Labs, Alice P. Broudy v. United States
See also In re Aircrash in Bali, Indonesia on April 22, 1974, 684 F.2d 1301, 1312 (9th Cir.1982) (dictum). 3 [] It is helpful at the outset to recognize that ‘ “[a] claim of deprivation of property without due process of law cannot be blended as one and the same with the claim that property has been taken for public use without just compensation.” ’ Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 539 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1042 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984) (quoting J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Valerie Boruski v. The United States of America, Merck, Sharp and Dohme Company, and the City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation
See, e.g., McKay v. Rockwell International Corp., 704 F.2d 444 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 711 , 79 L.Ed.2d 175 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McDermott v. TENDUN CONSTRUCTORS, ROHR INDUSTRIES, INC.
See also McKay v. Rockwell International Corp., 704 F. 2d 444, 450 (9th Cir.1983), cert. den., 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 711 , 79 L.Ed. 2d 175 (1984) (when only minimal or very general requirements are set forth by the United States contract, the government contractor defense is inapplicable).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Asbestos Litigation (Mergenthaler)
See, e.g., McKay v. Rockwell International Corp., 9th Cir., 704 F.2d 444 , 454 & n. 14 (1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 1043 , 104 S.Ct. 711 , 79 L.Ed.2d 175 (1984); Marker v. Universal Oil Products Co., 10th Cir., 250 F.2d 603, 606-07 (1957) (applying Oklahoma law); Goodbar v. Whitehead Bros., W.D.Va., 591 F.Supp. 552, 560-61 (1984) (applying Virginia law), aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rottman v. U.S. Coast Guard Academy
Fifth Amendment claims ... and First Amendment claims.” Lage v. Thomas, 585 F.Supp. 403, 405-06 (N.D.Tex.1984); see, e.g., Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 542 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1042 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984) (fifth amendment claim); Porter v. Adams, 639 F.2d 273, 278 (5th Cir.1981) (fifth amendment claim); Sorrells v. V.A., 576 F.Supp. 1254, 2258 (S.D.Ohio 1983) (first amendment claim); Munoz v. Orr, 559 *1125 F.Supp. 1017, 1019 (W.D.Tex.1983) (first amendment claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James E. Brown v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army
(2×)
See also Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 543 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1042 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ivanhoe v. Gaby
See, e.g., Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 542-43 (D.C.Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1042 , 104 S.Ct. 709 , 79 L.Ed.2d 173 (1984) (plaintiff may not sue on constitutional grounds on matter that could be subject of lawsuit under Title VII).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Boyd
v.
Lehman, Secretary of the Navy
v.
Lehman, Secretary of the Navy
No. 83-732.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1984.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (2)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.