Ehlers v. City of Decatur, 464 U.S. 824 (1983).

discussed Cited "see" Smith v. Northwest Financial Acceptance, Inc.

10th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

Appellants’ App., Vol. I at 166 (internal quotation marks omitted); see Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 703 F.2d 1152, 1168 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983).

discussed Cited "see" Smith v. Northwest Financial Acceptance

10th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

Appellants' App., Vol. I at 166 (internal quotation marks omitted); see Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 703 F.2d 1152, 1168 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983).

10th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high

See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 703 F.2d 1152 , 1176 & n. 20 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc) (plurality opinion), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983) (holding that where no objection was made to the charge and there was sufficient evidence to sustain ruling under other theories "any error in submitting the [improper] theory should not now be considered on appeal").

discussed Cited "see" Anixter v. Home-Stake Production Co.

10th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high

See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 703 F.2d 1152 , 1176 & n. 20 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc) (plurality opinion), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983) (holding that where no objection was made to the charge and there was sufficient evidence to sustain ruling under other theories “any error in submitting the [improper] theory should not now be considered on appeal”).

cited Cited "see" Kenneth Earl Fenstermacher v. Telelect, Inc., a Corporation, and Dealers Truck Equipment Company, Inc., a Corporation McErt Inc., Formerly Known as Independent Testing Laboratories, Inc., Kenneth Earl Fenstermacher v. Telelect, Inc., a Corporation McErt Inc., Formerly Known as Independent Testing Laboratories, Inc.

10th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high

See Malandris v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 703 F.2d 1152, 1177 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 (1983).

discussed Cited "see" Mayhue v. St. Francis Hospital of Wichita, Inc.

10th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high

See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152, 1179 (10th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); see also United States v. Cheyenne, 855 F.2d 566, 568 (8th Cir.1988) (“We give substantial weight to the trial court’s appraisal of the prejudicial effects of extraneous information on the jury, since the trial judge has the advantages of close observation of the jurors and intimate familiarity with the issues at trial.”); Day, 830 F.2d at 1106 (“‘the trial judge ... is in the best position to evaluate the effect of the …

discussed Cited "see" 59 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 405, 59 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,672 Bertha E. Mayhue, and Cross-Appellee v. St. Francis Hospital of Wichita, Inc., and Cross-Appellant

10th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high

See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152, 1179 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); see also United States v. Cheyenne, 855 F.2d 566, 568 (8th Cir.1988) ("We give substantial weight to the trial court's appraisal of the prejudicial effects of extraneous information on the jury, since the trial judge has the advantages of close observation of the jurors and intimate familiarity with the issues at trial."); Day, 830 F.2d at 1106 (" 'the trial judge ... is in the best position to evaluate the effect of the offending …

cited Cited "see" State v. Fecteau

N.H. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Hensel, 699 F.2d 18, 41 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 958 , 464 U.S. 823 , 464 U.S. 824 (1983).

discussed Cited "see" Apperson v. Fleet Carrier Corporation

6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high

Similarly, an arbitration award may be overturned if the decision was rendered by an arbitration panel with "demonstrated bias," Morris v. Werner-Continental, Inc., 466 F.2d 1185, 1190 (6th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 965 , 93 S.Ct. 2144 , 36 L.Ed.2d 685 (1973); see Early v. Eastern Transfer, 699 F.2d 552, 558 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 93 , 78 L.Ed.2d 100 (1983), or "evident partiality," 9 U.S.C.

cited Cited "see" Norman G. Kelley, Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company Allstate Life Insurance Company, Cross-Appellees

10th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high

See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 703 F.2d 1152, 1168-69 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc) (plurality opinion), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983).

discussed Cited "see" Apperson v. Fleet Carrier Corp.

6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high

Similarly, an arbitration award may be overturned if the decision was rendered by an arbitration panel with “demonstrated bias,” Morris v. Werner-Continental, Inc., 466 F.2d 1185, 1190 (6th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 965 , 93 S.Ct. 2144 , 36 L.Ed.2d 685 (1973); see Ear ly v. Eastern Transfer, 699 F.2d 552, 558 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 93 , 78 L.Ed.2d 100 (1983), or “evident partiality,” 9 U.S.C. § 10 (b) (1982) 9 ; cf. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co., 393 U.S. 145 , 89 S.Ct. 337 , 21 L.Ed.2d 301 (1968) (vacating arbitration awar…

discussed Cited "see" Harry Tongay v. The Kroger Company International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehouseman and Helpers of America

8th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high

See Early v. Eastern Transfer, 699 F.2d 552, 557, 559-60 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 93 , 78 L.Ed.2d 100 (1983); see also Grant v. Burlington Indus., 832 F.2d 76 , 80-81 (7th Cir.1987); Beckett v. Anchor Motor Freight, 118 L.R.R.M. 2608 , 2612-13 (S.D.Ohio 1982); Difini v. Spector Freight Sys., Inc., 101 L.R.R.M. 3055 , 3058 (E.D.N.Y.1979).

cited Cited "see" O'Gilvie v. International Playtex, Inc.

10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high

See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152, 1168 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc) (plurality opinion), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); J.T.

cited Cited "see" O'gilvie v. International Playtex, Inc.

10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high

See Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152, 1168 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc) (plurality opinion), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); J.T.

discussed Cited "see" Bradbury v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high

See, Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 703 F.2d 1152, 1173-74 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Holland Furnace Co. v. Robson, 157 Colo. 347 , 402 P.2d 628, 631 (Colo.1965), Restatement (Second) of Agency, § 217C (1957).

discussed Cited "see" Bradbury v. Phillips Petroleum Company

10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high

See, Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 703 F.2d 1152, 1173-74 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Holland Furnace Co. v. Robson, 157 Colo. 347 , 402 P.2d 628, 631 (Colo.1965), Restatement (Second) of Agency, Sec. 217C (1957).II. 24 The altercation between Desert Drilling Company personnel and Bradbury in August, 1980, was not the first time landowners in the Placerville area had found reason to complain about the uranium exploration project.

cited Cited "see" Ash v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

4th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high

See Early v. Eastern Transfer, 699 F.2d 552, 556 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 93 , 78 L.Ed.2d 100 (1983).

cited Cited "see" Ernest R. Ash v. United Parcel Service, Inc., a New York Corp., International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, and Helpers of America, a Labor Organization, & Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local Union No. 175, a Labor Organization, Ernest R. Ash v. United Parcel Service, Inc., a New York Corp., and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, and Helpers of America, a Labor Organization, & Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local Union No. 175, a Labor Organization, Ernest R. Ash v. United Parcel Service, Inc., a New York Corp., and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, and Helpers of America, a Labor Organization, & Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local Union No. 175, a Labor Organization

4th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high

See Early v. Eastern Transfer, 699 F.2d 552, 556 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 93 , 78 L.Ed.2d 100 (1983).

discussed Cited "see" Barbara Ann Alley and W.H. Alley, Cross-Appellees v. Gubser Development Company, National Gypsum Company and Weyerhaeuser Company, Cross-Appellants

10th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high

See, Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, 703 F.2d 1152, 1177 (10th Cir.1981), *856 cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983) (nature of the act which caused the injury is to be considered.) The Colorado Supreme Court has defined the phrase "wanton and reckless disregard” in the exemplary damage statute as follows: “If, conscious of his conduct and the existing conditions, he [defendant] knew or should have known, that the injury would probably result, the requirements of the statute are met.” Foster v. Redding, 97 Colo. 4 , 45 P.2d 940 -41 (1935) …

cited Cited "see, e.g." Diana L. Mason, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Otis W. Mason, Deceased v. Texaco, Inc.

10th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 703 F.2d 1152, 1173 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." John Carr v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n, Greg Brooks, Judy Checkers v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n (2×)

9th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low

See e.g., Early v. Eastern Transfer, 699 F.2d 552, 558 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 93 , 78 L.Ed.2d 100 (1983); Cook Industries, Inc. v. C.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Harold W. GRANDCHAMP and Peter J. Seewald, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC., Defendant-Appellant

10th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low

Under the Restatement, liability may be found only.“where the conduct has been so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in, a civilized community.” Rugg, 476 P.2d at 756 . (quoting Restatement § 46, comment d); see also Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152, 1158-59 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc) (discussing Colorado law), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Churchey v. Adolph Coors Co., 759 P.2d 1336, 1350 (Colo.1…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mattingly, Inc. v. Beatrice Foods Company

10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152 , 1175 n. 17 (10th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983) (actions of a local manager are sufficient under Sec. 909 to impose punitive damages against the employer-corporation where it delegates a great deal of authority to its local branch managers). 121 The trial court's findings and the record demonstrate that the punitive damages award was not in error under the Sec. 909 analysis.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Higgs v. DIST. COURT IN AND FOR DOUGLAS CO.

Colo. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low

A verdict may not be set aside on grounds of passion, prejudice, or corruption unless the damages are "`so outrageous as to strike everyone with the enormity and injustice of them.'" Burns, 659 P.2d at 1356 ( quoting, Riss & Co., 108 Colo. at 85 , 114 P.2d at 281 ); see also Malandris v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Snowden v. Matthews, 160 F.2d 130 (10th Cir.1947).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Higgs v. District Court In & For the County of Douglas

Colo. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low

A verdict may not be set aside on grounds of passion, prejudice, or corruption unless the damages are “ ‘so outrageous as to strike everyone with the enormity and injustice of them.’ ” Burns, 659 P.2d at 1356 {quoting, Riss & Co., 108 Colo, at 85, 114 P.2d at 281 ); see also Malandris v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 703 F.2d 1152 (10th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 824 , 104 S.Ct. 92 , 78 L.Ed.2d 99 (1983); Snowden v. Matthews, 160 F.2d 130 (10th Cir.1947).

ca10	0R/0Y/16G/2P	46
ksd	0R/0Y/0G	13
ca1	0R/0Y/0G	5
ca4	0R/0Y/2G	5
nhd	0R/0Y/0G	5
ca8	0R/0Y/1G	4
ca9	0R/0Y/2G	4
cod	0R/0Y/0G	4
ca2	0R/0Y/0G	3
ca7	0R/0Y/0G	3
illappct	0R/0Y/0G	3
mad	0R/0Y/0G	3