green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.4 score
“san carlos apache”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Harrell v. Miller
See Barefoot v. Estelle, 464 U.S. 874 , 892–93 (1983); 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2).
cited
Cited "see"
Harrell v. Miller
See Barefoot v. Estelle, 464 U.S. 874 , 892–93 (1983); 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
(3×)
“Ensuring compliance with a prior order is an equitable goal which a court is empowered to pursue even absent a finding of contempt.” Berger, 771 F.2d at 1569 ; accord Alexander v. Hill, 707 F.2d 780, 783 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 874 , 104 S.Ct. 206 , 78 L.Ed.2d 183 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. Beyer
See generally Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 , reh'g denied, 464 U.S. 874 (1983). 14 instructed judges to ensure that a criminal defendant had a full understanding of what the plea connotes and its consequences by "canvassing the matter" on the record, thereby providing an adequate record for any review sought by the criminal defendant and forestalling collateral attacks that seek to probe murky memories. 395 U.S. at 243-44 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Darryl S. Hill v. Howard Beyer Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General for the State of New Jersey
(2×)
See generally Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 3383 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 , reh'g denied, 464 U.S. 874 , 104 S.Ct. 209 , 78 L.Ed.2d 185 (1983) 5 See generally Rule 3:9-2 of the New Jersey Rules Governing Criminal Practice: The court, in its discretion, may refuse to accept a plea of guilty and shall not accept such plea without first addressing the defendant personally and determining by inquiry of the defendant and others, in the court's discretion, that there is a factual basis for the plea and that the plea is made voluntarily, ... with an understanding of the nature of the charge …
examined
Cited "see"
Robidoux v. Kitchel
(3×)
See Alexander v. Hill, 549 F.Supp. 1355, 1359 (W.D.N.C.1982) (“[t]he law requires that all [AFDC and Medicaid] applications — not merely a substantial percentage of them' — be processed within the relevant time limits”) (emphasis in original), aff'd, 707 F.2d 780 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub. nom Syria v. Alexander, 464 U.S. 874 , 104 S.Ct. 206 , 78 L.Ed.2d 183 (1983); Hess v. Hughes, 500 F.Supp. 1054, 1063 (D.Md.1980) (enjoining Maryland Department of Human Resources from failing to issue Food Stamps to eligible applicants within the 30 day deadline); Tyson v. Norton, 390 F.Supp. 545,…
examined
Cited "see"
Southside Welfare Rights Organization v. Stangler
(3×)
See Alexander v. Hill, 707 F.2d 780, 784 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 874 , 104 S.Ct. 206 , 78 L.Ed.2d 183 (1983); Withrow v. Concannon, 942 F.2d 1385, 1387-88 (9th Cir.1991); Haskins v. Stanton, 794 F.2d 1273, 1277 (7th Cir.1986); Robertson v. Jackson, 766 F.Supp. 470, 476 (E.D.Va.1991), aff'd, 972 F.2d 529 (4th Cir.1992); Brown v. Luna, 735 F.Supp. 762, 767 (M.D.Tenn.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Woods
See Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 3383 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 *26 (1983), reh. den. 464 U.S. 874 , 104 S.Ct. 209 , 78 L.Ed.2d 185 . 4 We are aware of the decision in White v. Estelle, 720 F.2d 415 (5th Cir.1983), where it was held that in a federal habeas corpus proceeding the federal district court was not clearly erroneous in concluding that expert witnesses’ answers at Texas penalty hearing to “hypothetical” questions on petitioner’s propensity for future violence reasonably indicated that psychiatric prognosis of petitioner’s future dangerousness was influenced by and …
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank Teague v. Michael Lane, Director, Department of Corrections, and Michael O'leary, Warden
(2×)
See Teague v. Illinois, 464 U.S. 867 , 104 S.Ct. 206 , 78 L.Ed.2d 179 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Clark v. James
See Hall v. Alabama, 700 F.2d 1333, 1337 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 183 , 78 L.Ed.2d 183 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Clark v. James
See Hall v. Alabama, 700 F.2d 1333, 1337 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 859 , 104 S.Ct. 183 , 78 L.Ed.2d 183 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Board of Educ. of City of Chicago
(2×)
See, Alexander v. Hill, 707 F.2d 780, 783 (D.C.Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 206 , 78 L.Ed.2d 183 (1983). 129.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Shifflett v. Kozlowski
(3×)
Schweiker v. Gray Panthers, 453 U.S. 34, 37 , 101 S.Ct. 2633, 2636 , 69 L.Ed.2d 460 (1981); see also Alexander v. Hill, 707 F.2d 780, 784 (4th Cir.) (approving award of remedial fine as part of court’s equitable power to achieve fair results for noncompli ance with federal time requirements), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 874 , 104 S.Ct. 206 , 78 L.Ed.2d 183 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Powell v. State
(2×)
See also Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 3383 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1983), reh. den. 464 U.S. 874 , 104 S.Ct. 209 , 78 L.Ed.2d 185 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clark
v.
Marston
v.
Marston
No. 82-6960.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Motion of respondents for damages denied. Certiorari denied.