green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Albertini
(2×)
II In the order granting certiorari, this Court asked the parties to address the additional question "[w]hether the respondent's attendance at the `open house' at Hickam Air Force Base on May 16, 1981, was the kind of reentry that Congress intended to prohibit in 18 U. S. C. § 1382 ." 469 U. S., at 1071.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brady v. Graham
See In re Burton, 472 A.2d 831, 835-37 (D.C.) (per curiam) (attorney found to have breached fiduciary obligation as trustee even though no conventional attorney/client relationship existed between him and the trust beneficiaries), cer t. denied, 469 U.S. 1071 , 105 S.Ct. 563 , 83 L.Ed.2d 504 (1984); In re Vogel, 382 A.2d 275, 279-80 (D.C.1978) (per curiam) (rejecting assumption that a lawyer’s responsibilities for funds in his possession should vary depending on whether the funds belong to a client or a third party); Charles W.
discussed
Cited "see"
Davidson v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine
See In re Burton, 472 A.2d 831, 838 (D.C.) (statutory scheme), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1071 , 105 S.Ct. 563 , 83 L.Ed.2d 504 (1984); Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown v. Zoning Comm’n of the District of Columbia, 392 A.2d 1027, 1033 (D.C.1978) (en banc); Auger v. District of Columbia Bd. of Appeals and Review, 477 A.2d 196, 210-11 (D.C.1984) (citing Peoples Drug Stores v. District of Columbia, 470 A.2d 751, 753-54 (D.C.1983) (en banc)).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Franklin
See In re Burton, 472 A.2d 831 (D.C.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1071 , 105 S.Ct. 563 , 83 L.Ed.2d 504 (1984); In re Minninberg, 485 A.2d 149 (D.C.1984); In re Burka, 423 A.2d 181 (D.C.1980) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ray v. United States Department of Justice
See, e.g., Jean v. Nelson, 727 F.2d 957, 979-81 (11th Cir.) (judicial intervention allowed prior to final agency decision in order to enjoin widespread practice of denying claimants’ notice of their right to present asylum claim to particular agency), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1071 , 105 S.Ct. 563 , 83 L.Ed.2d 504 (1984); Haitian Refugee Center v. Smith, 676 F.2d 1023, 1033 (5th Cir.1982) (claims of “a pattern and practice by immigration officials to violate the constitutional rights of a class of aliens ... constitute wrongs which are independently cognizable in the district court under its …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ray v. United States Department of Justice
See, e.g., Jean v. Nelson, 727 F.2d 957, 979-81 (11th Cir.) (judicial intervention allowed prior to final agency decision in order to enjoin widespread practice of denying claimants' notice of their right to present asylum claim to particular agency), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1071 , 105 S.Ct. 563 , 83 L.Ed.2d 504 (1984); Haitian Refugee Center v. Smith, 676 F.2d 1023, 1033 (5th Cir.1982) (claims of "a pattern and practice by immigration officials to violate the constitutional rights of a class of aliens ... constitute wrongs which are independently cognizable in the district court under its fede…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Addams
Compare In re Burton, 472 A.2d 831, 848 (D.C.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1071 , 105 S.Ct. 563 , 83 L.Ed.2d 504 (1984) (disbarment for commingling and misappropriation in two separate cases and lying to Auditor-Master in defense of misconduct), with In re Cefaratti, supra, No. M-140-82 at 6-7 (citing as a mitigating factor, before imposing suspension of a year and a day for misappropriation, absence of previous disciplinary violation in a career spanning thirty-four years).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Addams
Compare In re Burton, 472 A.2d 831, 848 (D.C.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1071 , 105 S.Ct. 563 , 83 L.Ed.2d 504 (1984) (sanction of disbarment of attorney for improper commingling and misappropriation of funds buttressed by the fact that the respondent had recently been found to have misappropriated funds in another matter), with In re Cefarrati, supra, No. M-140-82 at 6-7 (citing as a mitigating factor before imposing suspension of a year and a day for misappropriation fact that respondent had no previous disciplinary violation in a career spanning thirty-four years). 12 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Charlette A. Karns, Individually, and as Mother and Next Friend of Donald Wayne Pearce v. Emerson Electric Co., a Missouri Corporation
See, e.g., Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. Aspen Skiing Corp., 738 F.2d 1509 , 1523 (10th Cir.1984), aff 'd, 469 U.S. 585 , 105 S.Ct. 2847 , 83 L.Ed.2d 503 (1985); Strong, 667 F.2d at 685 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Yim Tong Chung v. Smith
Compare Jean v. Nelson, 727 F.2d 957 , 962, 984 (11th Cir.1984), aff’d, 469 U.S. 1071 , 105 S.Ct. 563 , 83 L.Ed.2d 504 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sang Seup Shin v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
See, e.g., Rios-Pineda v. INS, 720 F.2d 529 (8th Cir. 1983), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 562 , 83 L.Ed.2d 503 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Immigration and Naturalization Service
v.
Rios-Pineda
v.
Rios-Pineda
No. 83-2032.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1984.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted.