green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
26.2 score
“pacemaker”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Romesh Japra, M.D., F.A.C.C., Inc. v. Apte (In Re Apte)
But see id. at 1462 (Fernandez, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (stating that “because the legal standard for judging whether reliance is justifiable requires us to determine, by reference to the 'data of practical human experience’ whether an individual's reliance was justified, 'the trial court's findings of fact effectively determine our legal conclusion,’" thus making the issue of justifiable reliance a mixed question of fact and law) (quoting United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1204 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984)). …
discussed
Cited "see"
Denise Green v. City & County of San Francisco
See 918 F.2d at 825 (citing United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1206 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (recognizing that the drug trade is often dangerous and involves weapons)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Liddy v. Lamone
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201-02 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984). 15 Accordingly, where the *249 issue is whether a party is precluded by laches from challenging an action of another party, we shall review the trial court’s ultimate determination of the issue de novo, just as we do in similar circumstances. 16 Thus, we hold that the Circuit Court erred in not invoking the doctrine of laches as a bar to the appellant’s untimely claim when it placed the determination of *250 a candidate’s eligibility ahead of the urgency…
cited
Cited "see"
Graf v. Gonzales
See Fallini v. Hodel, 783 F.2d 1343, 1345 (9th Cir.1986) citing United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ball
(2×)
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1202-04 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1206 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984); United States v. Davis, 617 F.2d 677, 695 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 967 , 100 S.Ct. 1659 , 64 L.Ed.2d 244 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Espinoza
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1206 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984); United States v. Davis, 617 F.2d 677, 695 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 967 , 100 S.Ct. 1659 , 64 L.Ed.2d 244 (1980) (no violation of § 3109 where police knocked, announced themselves, and entered after 15 to 30 seconds passed without response; no exigent circumstances raised).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, (97-6308/6309) v. David Tex Hill, (97-6051/6286)
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Whaley v. Thompson
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1204 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984); United States v. Spillone, 879 F.2d 514, 520 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 878 , 111 S.Ct. 210 , 112 L.Ed.2d 170 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Milwaukee County v. LOUISE M.
See Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America v. Instromedix, 725 F.2d 537 (9th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984) (Article III requires that federal district judges retain their judicial power even if they delegate some authority to court-appointed magistrates).
cited
Cited "see"
Paula Bass Gary Singer, as Co-Executors of the Estate of Arthur C. Bass v. First Pacific Networks, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, as Surety To
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1202 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Ronald C. MacIntyre Mary M. Pikus, Debtors. Philip A. Demassa, Apc Philip A. Demassa v. Ronald C. MacIntyre Mary M. Pikus
Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); see United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher Fredrick Vonwillie, AKA Christopher Fred Vonwillie
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1206 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (mild exigency is sufficient to justify simultaneous knock/announce and entry if entry does not require physical destruction of property), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984); United States v. Whitney, 633 F.2d 902, 909 (9th Cir.1980) (“only a mild indication of exigency is required to excuse noncompliance with the ‘refusal of admittance’ requirement of section 3109”), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1004 , 101 S.Ct. 1717 , 68 L.Ed.2d 208 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Sanchez-Montoya
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984)
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Eugene May
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1203 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984) (citing Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23 (1963)) 3 The district court disagreed with defendant's concession and held there was no probable cause to get a search warrant prior to the officers' arrival at the hotel; for, even though the agents knew that the package contained illegal drugs, the agents could not have been certain that May was knowingly in possession of contraband.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lloyd Gene Ploutz, United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Lloyd Gene Ploutz, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
See United States v. McCooney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201-03 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
American Federation of Government Employees Council 33, Local 51, Anna Williams, Roberta Butler, Elaine McKinsey Mildred Miller, and John Turri v. Lloyd Bentsen, Secretary of the Department of Treasury
See, e.g., Arneson v. Heckler, 879 F.2d 393, 397 (8th Cir.1989); see generally United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201-04 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gloria Franklin and Johnny Curry v. Derrick Foxworth
(2×)
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel James Fowlie
(2×)
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1202 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Western Recreational Vehicles, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. Swift Adhesives, Inc., a Division of Reichhold Chemicals, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Western Recreational Vehicles, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. Swift Adhesives, Inc., a Division of Reichhold Chemicals, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1200 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (mixed questions are those "in which the historical facts are ... established, the rule of law is undisputed, and the issue is whether the facts satisfy the relevant statutory ... standard") (internal quotation omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Western Recreational Vehicles, Inc. v. Swift Adhesives, Inc.
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1200 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (mixed questions are those “in which the historical facts are ... established, the rule of law is undisputed, and the issue is whether the facts satisfy the relevant statutory ... standard”) (internal quotation omitted), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Viken Yacoubian
See generally United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201-04 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Alvin Barker
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
John H. Baker Jack P. Chambers J. Jess Huerta William T. McMullen Thomas B. Ryan Howard W. Stokes Paul L. Stunz, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. John H. Baker, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., John H. Baker Jack P. Chambers J. Jess Huerta William T. McMullen Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Alvin C. Oppenheim, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Baker v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mark v. Shoen v. Leonard Samuel Shoen, Edward J. Shoen v. Leonard Samuel Shoen, Ronald J. Watkins
(2×)
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas Leroy Cifu v. Otis Thurman, Warden
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195 , 1200 & n. 5 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (reviewing factual findings for clear error), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul F. Soares
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Oliver Alvin Trigg, United States of America v. James Edward Cottle, United States of America v. James Edward Cottle, United States of America v. Oliver Alvin Trigg
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1202 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph T. Brady
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en bane), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Trigg
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1202 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. First Interstate Bank of California, a California Corporation
See Pullman-Standard, Div. of Pullman, Inc. v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273 , 289 n. 19 (1982), United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1200 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Estate of Barbara L. Reynolds v. Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Diego Toro Adriana Toro, and Ralph T. Powell, Maria L. Powell, Sureties, Real Parties in Interest
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Chen
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Chen
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brinderson-Newberg Joint Venture Brinderson Corporation Gust K. Newberg Corporation Frank J. Loscavio Brinderson Constructors, Inc., - Counter v. Pacific Erectors, Inc. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Brinderson-Newberg Joint Venture Brinderson Corporation Gust K. Newberg Corporation Frank J. Loscavio Brinderson Constructors, Inc., - Counter v. Pacific Erectors, Inc. Defendant-Counter-Claimant, and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant. Brinderson-Newberg Joint Venture Brinderson Corporation Gust K. Newberg Corporation Frank J. Loscavio Brinderson Constructors, Inc., - Counter v. Pacific Erectors, Inc. Defendant-Counter-Claimant, and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201, 1204 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (questions of law and application of law is reviewed de novo), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984). 52 Although Brinderson's argument is tenable, Hartford's position is the better interpretation of the law.
cited
Cited "see"
Hacienda La Puente Unified School District Of Los Angeles v. William Honig
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Hacienda La Puente Unified School District v. Honig
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jolene Phillips, United States of America v. Jolene Phillips
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (issues of law reviewed de novo), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984). 16 It is well settled that a breath test or blood sample test is a search that is subject to the requirements of the Fourth Amendment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Assembly Of The State Of California v. United States Department Of Commerce
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1204 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (mixed questions of law and fact are not reviewed de novo when "the applicable legal standard provides for a strictly factual test"), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Crane v. Arizona Republic
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crane v. the Arizona Republic
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984). 30 Whether a plaintiff qualifies as a public official is a question of law to be afforded de novo review.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brinderson-Newberg Joint Venture v. Pacific Erectors, Inc.
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201, 1204 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (questions of law and application of law is reviewed de novo), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Assembly of California v. United States Department of Commerce
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1204 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (mixed questions of law and fact are not reviewed de novo when “the applicable legal standard provides for a strictly factual test”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Raymond A. Chamberlin v. California Department of Corrections
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Ward, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Anton Ward Helen Ward Helen Ward Tucker Betty Ward Fisher Jean Ward Thompson Lillie Ward Manns v. City of San Jose, a Municipal Corporation Joseph D. McNamara Individually and as Chief of San Jose Police Department, and Richard Vasquez, Individually and as Police Officer of the City of San Jose James Rodrigues, Individually and as Police Officer of the City of San Jose Humberto Renteria, Individually and as Volunteer Reserve Police Officer of the City of San Jose, John Ward, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Anton Ward Helen Ward Helen Ward Tucker Betty Ward Fisher Jean Ward Thompson Lillie Ward Manns Sabrina Ward, Minor v. City of San Jose, a Municipal Corporation Joseph D. McNamara Individually and as Chief of San Jose Police Department Richard Vasquez, Individually and as Police Officer of the City of San Jose Humberto Renteria, Individually and as Volunteer Reserve Police Officer of the City of San Jose, John Ward, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Anton Ward, and Delissa Ward, Guardian Ad Litem of Minor Sabrina Ward Sabrina Ward, Minor v. City of San Jose, a Municipal Corporation Richard Vasquez, Individually and as Police Officer of the City of San Jose James Rodrigues, Individually and as Police Officer of the City of San Jose Humberto Renteria, Individually and as Volunteer Reserve Police Officer of the City of San Jose, John Ward, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Anton Ward Helen Ward Helen Ward Tucker Betty Ward Fisher Jean Ward Thompson Lillie Ward Manns v. City of San Jose, a Municipal Corporation, and Richard Vasquez, Individually and as Police Officer of the City of San Jose James Rodrigues, Individually and as Police Officer of the City of San Jose Humberto Renteria, Individually and as Volunteer Reserve Police Officer of the City of San Jose, John Ward, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Anton Ward Helen Ward Helen Ward Tucker Betty Ward Fisher Jean Ward Thompson Lillie Ward Manns v. City of San Jose, a Municipal Corporation Joseph D. McNamara Individually and as Chief of San Jose Police Department Richard Vasquez, Individually and as Police Officer of the City of San Jose James Rodrigues, Individually and as Police Officer of the City of San Jose Humberto Renteria, Individually and as Volunteer Reserve Police Officer of the City of San Jose
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984). 20 Graham was a diabetic whose behavior prior to a diabetic coma attracted the attention of the Charlotte, North Carolina police.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jose Fabela Martinez v. W.C. Wells, Warden, and U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984). 7 We note that the district court correctly determined it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate Martinez's request for habeas corpus relief.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lois Anderson v. United States
See United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1200-1205 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984) (standard of review is de novo both for questions of law and for mixed questions of law and fact where the legal issues predominate).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc.
v.
Instromedix, Inc.
v.
Instromedix, Inc.
No. 83-1873.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. California (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.