green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
14.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…when a mistrial occurs because of the inability of a jury to agree on a verdict, it is the same as if no trial took place.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Kierin M. Dennis
when a mistrial occurs because of the inability of a jury to agree on a verdict, it is the same as if no trial took place.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Kierin M. Dennis
when a mistrial occurs because of the inability of a jury to agree on a verdict, it is the same as if no trial took place.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Earl Hillsberg
here is considerable overlap between a psychotic person's inability to understand and his ability to control his behavior.
discussed
Cited "see"
Platt v. Kini L.C.
See Massey v. Emergency Assistance, Inc., 580 F.Supp. 937, 943 (W.D.Mo.1983) aff'd 724 F.2d 690 (8th Cir.) cert. denied 469 U.S. 930 , 105 S.Ct. 323 , 83 L.Ed.2d 260 (1984) (whether agency relationship exists turns on whether agent acts on behalf of and is subject to control of principal).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David John MURDOCH, Defendant-Appellant. (Two Cases)
(2×)
See United States v. Lyons, 731 F.2d 243 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 930 , 105 S.Ct. 323 , 83 L.Ed.2d 260 (1984) (issue of insanity cannot go to jury where evidence is only that defendant suffers from a narcotics addiction which does not, standing alone, fall within scope of mental disease or defect).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terry J. Artis v. Francis Howell North Band Booster Association, Inc. Francis Howell R-Iii School District Joseph Stacy
Separate entities can be consolidated to meet the Title VII employee numer-osity requirement based on the following factors: “(1) interrelation of operations, (2) common management, (3) centralized control of labor relations, and (4) common ownership or financial control.” Baker v. Stuart Broadcasting Co., 560 F.2d 389, 392 (8th Cir.1977) (applying factors used by the National Labor Relations Board under the Fair Labor Standards Act to Title VII to determine whether two related entities could be considered as a single employer); see also Massey v. Emer gency Assistance, Inc., 724 F.2d 690 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terry J. Artis v. Francis Howell North
Separate entities can be consolidated to meet the Title VII employee numerosity requirement based on the following factors: "(1) interrelation of operations, (2) common management, (3) centralized control of labor relations, and (4) common ownership or financial control." Baker v. Stuart Broadcasting Co., 560 F.2d 389, 392 (8th Cir. 1977) (applying factors used by the National Labor Relations Board under the Fair Labor Standards Act to Title VII to determine whether two related entities could be considered as a single employer); see also Massey v. Emergency Assistance, Inc., 724 F.2d 690, 690-…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Liparota
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-5108.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of South Caro… (2) · Seventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in fo'rma pauperis and certiorari granted.