green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Dunn v. Sullivan
Fairview Tp., York County v. United States E.P.A., 773 F.2d 517, 528 (3rd Cir.1985); Nora Stylings, Inc. v. Ladd, 695 F.2d 1179, 1181 (9th Cir.1983); Grant v. Hogan, 505 F.2d 1220, 1225 (3rd Cir.1974); but see Kuehner v. Schweiker, 717 F.2d 813 (3rd Cir.1983), vacated and remanded on other grounds, Heckler v. Kuehner, 469 U.S. 977 , 105 S.Ct. 376 , 83 L.Ed.2d 312 (1984) (subject matter jurisdiction found under both 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) and 28 U.S.C. § 1361 ).
cited
Cited "see"
State of Maryland v. Philip Morris Inc.
See Kuehner v. Schweiker, 717 F.2d 813 (3rd Cir.1983), vacated, 469 U.S. 977 , 105 S.Ct. 376 , 83 L.Ed.2d 312 (1984); Ellis v. Blum, 643 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Wilkerson v. Sullivan
See Kuehner v. Schweiker, 717 F.2d 813 (3d Cir.1983) vacated on other grounds, 469 U.S. 977 , 105 S.Ct. 376 , 83 L.Ed.2d 312 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Samuels v. Heckler
See also, Heckler v. Kuehner, 469 U.S. 977 , 105 S.Ct. 376 , 83 L.Ed.2d 312 (1984) (the Court ignored an opportunity to dismiss and only remanded instead); Lopez v. Heckler, 753 F.2d 1464 (9th Cir.1985); Holden v. Heckler, 615 F.Supp. 682 (M.D.Ohio 1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Molders & Allied Workers v. United Foundries, Inc.
See also Kuehner v. Schweiker, 717 F.2d 813 , 828 n. 17 (3d Cir. 1983), vacated 469 U.S. 977 , 105 S.Ct. 376 , 83 L.Ed.2d 312 (1984) (Becker, J., concurring) (pendent-party jurisdiction is another basis for jurisdiction over individual state defendants if mandamus jurisdiction does not apply; citing Aldinger); Sansom Committee v. Lynn, 735 F.2d 1535 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 431 , 83 L.Ed.2d 358 (1984) (Garth, J., dissenting) (Aldinger discussed; trend against expansive pendent-party federal question jurisdiction; statute conferring federal jurisdiction must be examine…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services
v.
Kuehner
v.
Kuehner
No. 83-1593.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 5, 1984.
Cited by 19 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to the Court of Appeals to be remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania with instructions to: (1) remand the cases of the named respondents to the Secretary for review pursuant to § 2(d)(2)(C) of the Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act of 1984; (2) make any necessary clarifications in the definition and scope of the class; (3) remand the cases of the unnamed class members to the Secretary for proceedings pursuant to § 2(d)(3) of that Act; and (4) take other actions appropriate in light of that Act.